Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » D-Link » DLINET1775644215

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (DLINET1775644215)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-20
Company Score Before Incident688 / 1000
Company Score After Incident668 / 1000
INCIDENT NUMBERDLINET1775644215
Type of Cyber IncidentCyber Attack
ATTACK VECTORExploitation of vulnerable IoT devices via open ports
DATA EXPOSEDNA
INCIDENT DATE29/07/2025
STATUSOngoing

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of D-Link's Cyber Attack and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts D-Link Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the D-Link breach identified under incident ID DLINET1775644215.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of D-Link's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/dlink-corp, the number of followers: 12654, the industry type: Information Technology & Services and the number of employees: 525 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 688 and after the incident was 668 with a difference of -20 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on D-Link and their customers.

On 01 January 2023, a cybersecurity incident called "Masjesu Botnet: A Stealthy, Evolving IoT Threat for DDoS-as-a-Service" came to light.

The Masjesu botnet, first detected in early 2023 and still active through 2026, is a highly sophisticated DDoS-for-hire service targeting Internet of Things (IoT) devices.

The disruption is felt across the environment, affecting IoT devices (D-Link, Netgear, Huawei, GPON).

In response, moved swiftly to contain the threat with measures like Monitor outbound traffic for unusual HTTP requests or connections to malicious domains, and began remediation that includes Implement process and file integrity monitoring, enforce IoT security hygiene (change default credentials, apply firmware updates).

The case underscores how Ongoing, teams are taking away lessons such as Traditional antivirus detection is often ineffective against stealthy botnets like Masjesu. Organizations should adopt behavior-based defenses and enforce IoT security hygiene, and recommending next steps like Monitor outbound traffic for unusual HTTP requests or connections to known malicious domains, Implement process and file integrity monitoring to detect spoofed system files or unauthorized cron jobs and Enforce basic IoT security hygiene, including changing default credentials and applying firmware updates.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating exploitation of vulnerable IoT devices via open ports and Valid Accounts: Default Accounts (T1078.001) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating default credentials in IoT devices. Under the Execution tactic, the analysis identified Command and Scripting Interpreter: Unix Shell (T1059.004) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating deploys a malicious shell script to recruit devices and Scheduled Task/Job: Cron (T1053.003) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating using cron jobs to re-execute every 15 minutes. Under the Persistence tactic, the analysis identified Create or Modify System Process: Systemd Service (T1543.002) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating binding to a hardcoded TCP port and ignoring termination signals and Scheduled Task/Job: Cron (T1053.003) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating using cron jobs to re-execute every 15 minutes. Under the Defense Evasion tactic, the analysis identified Masquerading: Match Legitimate Name or Location (T1036.005) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating renaming its executable to mimic legitimate system files, Obfuscated Files or Information (T1027) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating xOR-based encryption to conceal C2 domains and payloads, and Hide Artifacts: Hidden Window (T1564.003) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating prioritizes stealth and long-term persistence. Under the Discovery tactic, the analysis identified Network Service Discovery (T1046) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating scanning random IP addresses for vulnerable open ports. Under the Command and Control tactic, the analysis identified Application Layer Protocol: Web Protocols (T1071.001) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating connections to known malicious domains via HTTP requests and Encrypted Channel: Asymmetric Cryptography (T1573.002) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating xOR-based encryption for C2 domains and payloads. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Network Denial of Service (T1498) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating launch DDoS attacks under a unique masjesu user-agent. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Exploit Public-Facing Application (90%)
Valid Accounts: Default Accounts (80%)
Execution
Command and Scripting Interpreter: Unix Shell (80%)
Scheduled Task/Job: Cron (90%)
Persistence
Create or Modify System Process: Systemd Service (70%)
Scheduled Task/Job: Cron (90%)
Defense Evasion
Masquerading: Match Legitimate Name or Location (90%)
Obfuscated Files or Information (90%)
Hide Artifacts: Hidden Window (70%)
Discovery
Network Service Discovery (80%)
Command and Control
Application Layer Protocol: Web Protocols (80%)
Encrypted Channel: Asymmetric Cryptography (70%)
Impact
Network Denial of Service (90%)