Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

DLF LimitedDLF Limited
VS
Berkshire Hathaway HomeServicesBerkshire Hathaway HomeServices
DLF Limited

DLF Limited

DLF Cybercity, Raghvendra Marg, Gurugram, 122002, IN

Last Update: 31/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.dlf.in
788/1000Fair

With more than 75 years of real estate investment, development, and management experience, DLF has an unparalleled scale of delivery and an unmatched track record of customer-centric service excellence in India. Founded in 1946 by Chaudhary Raghvendra Singh, DLF starte...

NAICS:N/A
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:7,102
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
Berkshire Hathaway HomeServices

Berkshire Hathaway HomeServices

N/A

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
774/1000Fair

Berkshire Hathaway HomeServices is a global residential real estate network with more than 50,000 real estate professionals and nearly 1,600 offices across 4 continents and 13 countries and territories including the U.S., Canada, Mexico, Europe, the Middle East, The Ca...

NAICS:N/A
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:12,647
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
DLF Limited

DLF Limited

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Berkshire Hathaway HomeServices

Berkshire Hathaway HomeServices

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Real Estate Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for DLF Limited in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Real Estate Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Berkshire Hathaway HomeServices in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - DLF Limited (X = Date, Y = Severity)

DLF Limited cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Berkshire Hathaway HomeServices (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Berkshire Hathaway HomeServices cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
DLF Limited

DLF Limited

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
DLF173330922
Berkshire Hathaway HomeServices

Berkshire Hathaway HomeServices

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between DLF Limited company and Berkshire Hathaway HomeServices company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between DLF Limited company and Berkshire Hathaway HomeServices company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between DLF Limited company and Berkshire Hathaway HomeServices company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between DLF Limited company and Berkshire Hathaway HomeServices company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between DLF Limited company and Berkshire Hathaway HomeServices company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between DLF Limited company and Berkshire Hathaway HomeServices company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between DLF Limited company and Berkshire Hathaway HomeServices company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between DLF Limited company and Berkshire Hathaway HomeServices company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between DLF Limited company and Berkshire Hathaway HomeServices company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between DLF Limited company and Berkshire Hathaway HomeServices company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between DLF Limited company and Berkshire Hathaway HomeServices company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between DLF Limited and Berkshire Hathaway HomeServices, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between DLF Limited and Berkshire Hathaway HomeServices, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - DLF Limited or Berkshire Hathaway HomeServices ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - DLF Limited or Berkshire Hathaway HomeServices ?
Between DLF Limited and Berkshire Hathaway HomeServices, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between DLF Limited and Berkshire Hathaway HomeServices, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-59723
SUMMARY

Cline is an autonomous coding agent as an SDK, IDE extension, or CLI assistant. Prior to 3.0.30, the Cline Hub dashboard server launched by the cline dashboard command accepts WebSocket connections on the /browser endpoint without validating the Origin header, and when ROOM_SECRET is unset for local 127.0.0.1 binds, isAuthorizedBrowserRequest() allows attacker-controlled websites to send desktopCommand frames that read workspace state, mutate MCP and provider settings, and trigger command execution when a provider or model is configured. This issue is fixed in version 3.0.30.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-54784
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. In version 1.9.0, CoreWCF SPNEGO SecurityContextToken negotiation can expose the proof key recovered from the RSTR when TransportWithMessageCredential with Windows client credentials and session establishment are used, allowing an observer to impersonate the authenticated Windows principal and decrypt or forge WS-SecureConversation traffic. This issue is fixed in version 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54783
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF WS-Security endorsing and supporting signature verification does not ensure the selected ds:Signature covers the expected Security header target, allowing an attacker with one captured signed SOAP envelope to replay arbitrary service operations as the victim principal. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54782
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML 1.1 and SAML 2.0 token validation does not correctly resolve the issuer signing key or require signed tokens when IdentityConfiguration is used with federated bindings, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to impersonate any principal the trusted STS could issue. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-54781
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML token validation does not enforce SubjectConfirmation method URIs or holder-of-key proof keys in SamlSecurityTokenHandler, allowing holder-of-key downgrade or custom confirmation method assertions to authenticate a subject without proving authority over the assertion. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2