Comparison Overview
DIVD Dutch Institute for Vulnerability Disclosure
DIVD Dutch Institute for Vulnerability Disclosure
Maanweg 174, The Hague, South Holland, NL, 2516 AB
Last Update: 01/10/2026
We aim to make the digital world safer by reporting vulnerabilities we find in digital systems to the people who can fix them. We have a global reach, but do it Dutch style: open, honest, collaborative and for free. We scan from AS: 50.559, IP: 194.5.73.1-254
The Salvation Army
615 Slaters, Alexandria, VA, US, 22314
Last Update: 04/04/2026
The Salvation Army is the nation's largest direct provider of social services. Annually, we help millions overcome poverty, addiction, and spiritual and economic hardships by preaching the gospel of Jesus Christ and meeting human needs in His name without discriminati...
Compliance Ranges Comparison
DIVD Dutch Institute for Vulnerability Disclosure
The Salvation Army
Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Non-profit Organizations Industry Avg (This Year)
DIVD Dutch Institute for Vulnerability Disclosure has 42.53% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incidents vs Non-profit Organizations Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for The Salvation Army in 2026.
Incident History - DIVD Dutch Institute for Vulnerability Disclosure (X = Date, Y = Severity)
DIVD Dutch Institute for Vulnerability Disclosure cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - The Salvation Army (X = Date, Y = Severity)
The Salvation Army cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents
DIVD Dutch Institute for Vulnerability Disclosure
The Salvation Army
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to exposure of session tokens in the HTML response.
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to an XML external entity (XXE) injection flaw.
IBM Aspera Enterprise WebApps 1.0.0 through 1.0.6 could allow a local attacker to obtain sensitive information due to cleartext transmission of sensitive information.
IBM Planning Analytics 2.0, and 2.1 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a stack-based buffer overflow.
IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 can allow a man-in-the-middle attacker to present a forged TLS certificate, intercept the connection, and capture the IAM bearer Authorization header automatically attached by the session adapter. The captured token grants full platform-scope tenant API access, enabling the attacker to read and manipulate the victim's DataStage projects, flows, assets, and pipeline definitions. This is client-side SDK code running on the user's own machine, so exploitation requires an external network interceptor rather than a co-tenant in the shared cluster.