Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Dis-ChemDis-Chem
VS
AmplifonAmplifon
Dis-Chem

Dis-Chem

23 Stag Road, Midrand, Johannesburg, Gauteng, ZA, 1685

Last Update: 29/03/2026

View Profile
Between 650 and 699
http://www.dischem.co.za
693/1000Weak

As South Africa’s go-to health authority, Dis-Chem is an integrated health and retail partner committed to making quality care more affordable, convenient and inclusive for all. Guided by our purpose, Better Health Starts Here, we’re redefining healthcare by connecting...

NAICS:446
NAICS Definition:Health and Personal Care Stores
Employees:9,993
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
1
Amplifon

Amplifon

Via Ripamonti 133, Milan, 20141, IT

Last Update: 31/03/2026

View Profile
764/1000Fair

As the global leader in the hearing care retail industry, we have been changing the lives of millions of customers across the globe since 1950. With stores and offices spanning across 26 countries and a team of 20,300 dedicated professionals, we take pride in setting th...

NAICS:446
NAICS Definition:Health and Personal Care Stores
Employees:11,130
Subsidiaries:6
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Dis-Chem

Dis-Chem

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Amplifon

Amplifon

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Retail Health and Personal Care Products Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Dis-Chem in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Retail Health and Personal Care Products Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Amplifon in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Dis-Chem (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Dis-Chem cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Amplifon (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Amplifon cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Dis-Chem

Dis-Chem

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
DIS104712923
🔒 Incident : Breach
DIS32924522
Amplifon

Amplifon

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Dis-Chem company and Amplifon company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Dis-Chem company and Amplifon company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Dis-Chem company and Amplifon company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Dis-Chem company and Amplifon company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Dis-Chem company and Amplifon company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Dis-Chem company and Amplifon company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Dis-Chem company and Amplifon company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Dis-Chem company and Amplifon company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Dis-Chem company and Amplifon company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Dis-Chem company and Amplifon company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Dis-Chem company and Amplifon company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Dis-Chem and Amplifon, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Dis-Chem and Amplifon, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Dis-Chem or Amplifon ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Dis-Chem or Amplifon ?
Between Dis-Chem and Amplifon, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Dis-Chem and Amplifon, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-97626
SUMMARY

Requesting a user or organization profile page (`GET /{username}`) with an `Accept: application/rss+xml` or `Accept: application/atom+xml` header returned the owner's activity feed without the visibility check that the profile page and the `.rss` and `.atom` routes apply. Anonymous users, restricted users and non-members could confirm the existence of limited or private users and private organizations and read their profile details and public activity, also when `[other] ENABLE_FEED` was disabled. Activity in private repositories was not included.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-97208
SUMMARY

The Gitea API endpoint for creating push mirrors (`POST /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/push_mirrors`) checked only whether mirroring was enabled and not the `[mirror] DISABLE_NEW_PUSH` setting that the web interface enforces. A repository administrator could therefore create new push mirrors on instances where the site administrator had disabled them. A push mirror pushes all refs of the repository to a remote chosen by the caller, on each commit or on a schedule.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-96594
SUMMARY

The Gitea API endpoint `GET /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/media/{filepath}` wrote files of up to 1 KiB that are stored directly in Git, not in LFS, to the response without the content type and disposition headers Gitea uses for user content. An HTML file committed to a repository was therefore rendered by the browser on the Gitea origin. A user who can push to a repository could run JavaScript in the session of a victim who opens the media URL and act with the victim's permissions.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-89182
SUMMARY

With `[repository] FORCE_PRIVATE = true`, Gitea creates new repositories as private, but the post-receive hook still applied the `repo.private=false` push option to an empty repository created by push. Any user who can create repositories could make their new repository public in violation of the instance policy. The default configuration is not affected.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-86684
SUMMARY

The Gitea push mirror API checked whether the repository owner, instead of the requesting user, may use local file system paths. On instances with `[security] IMPORT_LOCAL_PATHS = true`, a repository administrator who is not allowed to import local paths could add a push mirror to a local path on the server when the repository owner has that permission. Gitea then pushed the repository's refs into an existing Git repository at that path with the permissions of the Gitea process.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA