Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

DirectPathDirectPath
VS
China Life Insurance Co.LtdChina Life Insurance Co.Ltd
DirectPath

DirectPath

120 18th St. S, Birmingham, AL, US, 35233

Last Update: 07/02/2026

View Profile
751/1000Fair

We offer a unique combination of personalized, confidential enrollment assistance, year-round benefits guidance, and benefits administration technology. Optavise unifies three of CNO’s existing Worksite brands (DirectPath, Web Benefits Design, and PMA USA) into a singl...

NAICS:524
NAICS Definition:Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees:77
Subsidiaries:10
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
China Life Insurance Co.Ltd

China Life Insurance Co.Ltd

西城区金融街, 北京, 100020, CN

Last Update: 10/09/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.chinalife.com.cn/
828/1000Good

China Life Insurance (Group) Company, headquartered in Beijing, is a large state-owned financial and insurance company. Its predecessor,PICC was founded in 1949 and the PICC (Life) Co.,Ltd was set up in 1996 after its separation from the former PICC. In 1999, it was ren...

NAICS:524
NAICS Definition:Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees:42,308
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
DirectPath

DirectPath

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
China Life Insurance Co.Ltd

China Life Insurance Co.Ltd

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for DirectPath in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for China Life Insurance Co.Ltd in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - DirectPath (X = Date, Y = Severity)

DirectPath cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - China Life Insurance Co.Ltd (X = Date, Y = Severity)

China Life Insurance Co.Ltd cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
DirectPath

DirectPath

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
China Life Insurance Co.Ltd

China Life Insurance Co.Ltd

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between DirectPath company and China Life Insurance Co.Ltd company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between DirectPath company and China Life Insurance Co.Ltd company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between DirectPath company and China Life Insurance Co.Ltd company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between DirectPath company and China Life Insurance Co.Ltd company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between DirectPath company and China Life Insurance Co.Ltd company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between DirectPath company and China Life Insurance Co.Ltd company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between DirectPath company and China Life Insurance Co.Ltd company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between DirectPath company and China Life Insurance Co.Ltd company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between DirectPath company and China Life Insurance Co.Ltd company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between DirectPath company and China Life Insurance Co.Ltd company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between DirectPath company and China Life Insurance Co.Ltd company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between DirectPath and China Life Insurance Co.Ltd, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between DirectPath and China Life Insurance Co.Ltd, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - DirectPath or China Life Insurance Co.Ltd ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - DirectPath or China Life Insurance Co.Ltd ?
Between DirectPath and China Life Insurance Co.Ltd, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between DirectPath and China Life Insurance Co.Ltd, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-90461
SUMMARY

OpenStack Ironic through 38.0.0 may send a username and password to an unexpected remote host when Image Service is configured for HTTP(S) Basic Authentication.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-11
UPDATED
Date2026-09-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-90460
SUMMARY

An issue was discovered in OpenStack Keystone before 29.0.3. Tokens obtained via delegated authentication methods (EC2 credentials, application credentials, OAuth1 access tokens, and trusts) are not blocked from creating, modifying, or deleting credentials via the /v3/credentials API. EC2-derived tokens can additionally read credential blobs, exposing TOTP MFA seeds and other secrets. Also, PATCH /v3/credentials does not validate the requested post-update project_id, allowing any delegated token to move a credential to an unauthorized project. All Keystone deployments using delegated authentication are affected.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-11
UPDATED
Date2026-09-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 7.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-90457
SUMMARY

The administrative password is hashed using a comparatively weak, fast algorithm for the credential store backing one authentication path, and the file containing that hash is written with permissions allowing it to be read by any local user. This is inconsistent with a separate, stronger hashing algorithm used for the same password on another authentication path. A party able to read this file, including a local user or a party with access to a configuration backup, could feasibly recover the underlying password through offline computation, compromising the administrative credential across every path that accepts it.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-11
UPDATED
Date2026-09-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-90456
SUMMARY

An example environment-configuration file for a bundled inventory-management component ships with a fixed, publicly-known administrative password. A deployment that copies this example file into active configuration without running the setup routine that regenerates credentials will expose that component's administrative interface to anyone aware of the default value.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-11
UPDATED
Date2026-09-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 9.2
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-90455
SUMMARY

A prior update that raised a bundled HTTP client library to a version remediating known vulnerabilities was later reverted, reintroducing the earlier, vulnerable version into a log-processing component. The only code path in that component using the library issues a request to a single fixed, trusted vendor URL at initialization and does not process attacker-controlled input through the library, limiting practical exploitability of the reintroduced version in this context.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-11
UPDATED
Date2026-09-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA