ISO 27001 Certificate
SOC 1 Type I Certificate
SOC 2 Type II Certificate
PCI DSS
HIPAA
RGPD
Internal validation & live display
Multiple badges & continuous verification
Faster underwriting decisions
ISOSOC2 Type 1SOC2 Type 2PCI DSSHIPAAGDPR

Founded in 1982, Directions for Living now serves over 35,000 people every year throughout the Tampa Bay area. We focus on preventing and healing trauma – particularly those traumas related to mental illness, homelessness, and substance misuse.

Directions for Living A.I CyberSecurity Scoring

DL

Company Details

Linkedin ID:

directions-for-living

Employees number:

206

Number of followers:

3,038

NAICS:

62133

Industry Type:

Mental Health Care

Homepage:

directionsforliving.org

IP Addresses:

0

Company ID:

DIR_3623623

Scan Status:

In-progress

AI scoreDL Risk Score (AI oriented)

Between 650 and 699

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/directions-for-living.jpeg
DL Mental Health Care
Updated:
  • Powered by our proprietary A.I cyber incident model
  • Insurance preferes TPRM score to calculate premium
globalscoreDL Global Score (TPRM)

XXXX

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/directions-for-living.jpeg
DL Mental Health Care
  • Instant access to detailed risk factors
  • Benchmark vs. industry & size peers
  • Vulnerabilities
  • Findings

DL Company CyberSecurity News & History

Past Incidents
2
Attack Types
1
EntityTypeSeverityImpactSeenBlog DetailsIncident DetailsView
Directions for LivingRansomware7547/2021
Rankiteo Explanation :
Attack with significant impact with customers data leaks

Description: Directions for Living (DFL) in Florida experienced a ransomware attack on July 5, 2021 after an unauthorized third party had gained access to its systems “via a firewall vulnerability” and encrypted some of its systems. The attack exposed the first and last names, addresses, dates of birth, social security numbers, diagnostic codes used for billing purposes, claims and insurance information, name of health care provider, date of health care services, and certain other health information of 19,494 patients. The healcare offered a single-bureau credit monitoring to all those affected by the incident.

Directions for LivingRansomware10057/2021
Rankiteo Explanation :
Attack threatening the organization's existence

Description: The Maine Office of the Attorney General reported a data breach involving Directions for Living on September 15, 2021. The breach, discovered on July 17, 2021, was a ransomware attack that affected four Maine residents and potentially compromised protected health information, including Social Security numbers.

Directions for Living
Ransomware
Severity: 75
Impact: 4
Seen: 7/2021
Blog:
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack with significant impact with customers data leaks

Description: Directions for Living (DFL) in Florida experienced a ransomware attack on July 5, 2021 after an unauthorized third party had gained access to its systems “via a firewall vulnerability” and encrypted some of its systems. The attack exposed the first and last names, addresses, dates of birth, social security numbers, diagnostic codes used for billing purposes, claims and insurance information, name of health care provider, date of health care services, and certain other health information of 19,494 patients. The healcare offered a single-bureau credit monitoring to all those affected by the incident.

Directions for Living
Ransomware
Severity: 100
Impact: 5
Seen: 7/2021
Blog:
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack threatening the organization's existence

Description: The Maine Office of the Attorney General reported a data breach involving Directions for Living on September 15, 2021. The breach, discovered on July 17, 2021, was a ransomware attack that affected four Maine residents and potentially compromised protected health information, including Social Security numbers.

Ailogo

DL Company Scoring based on AI Models

Cyber Incidents Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

🔒
Incident Predictions locked
Access Monitoring Plan

A.I Risk Score Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

🔒
A.I. Risk Score Predictions locked
Access Monitoring Plan
statics

Underwriter Stats for DL

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Directions for Living in 2025.

Incidents vs All-Companies Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Directions for Living in 2025.

Incident Types DL vs Mental Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Directions for Living in 2025.

Incident History — DL (X = Date, Y = Severity)

DL cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

DL Company Subsidiaries

SubsidiaryImage

Founded in 1982, Directions for Living now serves over 35,000 people every year throughout the Tampa Bay area. We focus on preventing and healing trauma – particularly those traumas related to mental illness, homelessness, and substance misuse.

Loading...
similarCompanies

DL Similar Companies

Parnassia Groep

Parnassia Groep is er voor uw gezondheid, dat doen wij met ruim 8.000 medewerkers. Zij zijn werkzaam op 560 locaties, die u vindt vooral in onze drie kernregio's Noord-Holland, Haaglanden, Rijnmond (waaronder de Zuid-Hollandse Eilanden). Welk psychisch of psychiatrisch probleem u ook heeft, wij h

newsone

DL CyberSecurity News

June 27, 2025 07:00 AM
New HIPAA Regulations in 2025

New HIPAA regulations may be implemented in 2025, such as the proposed update to the HIPAA Privacy Rule, a final rule for which is long overdue.

June 13, 2025 07:00 AM
TSA Issues New Warning About 2 Common Airport Habits That Invite Hackers

The Transportation Security Administration is advising travelers of two important cybersecurity threats while navigating airports ahead of a...

June 09, 2025 07:00 AM
ENISA updates NCSS Interactive Map to track EU cybersecurity progress, build cyber resilience

The European Union Agency for Cybersecurity (ENISA) has refreshed its National Cybersecurity Strategies (NCSS) Interactive Map.

December 02, 2024 08:00 AM
Do Your Passwords Meet the Proposed New Federal Guidelines?

New federal security guidelines are taking sharper aim at the terrible passwords we all create. The guidelines instruct organizations to stop requiring people...

October 15, 2024 07:00 AM
Guidelines and Companion Guide on Securing AI Systems

Artificial Intelligence (AI) offers significant benefits for the economy and society. It will drive efficiency and innovation across various...

February 07, 2024 08:00 AM
Combatting Cyber Threat Actors Perpetrating Living Off the Land Intrusions

The National Security Agency (NSA) is proud to partner with the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA), the Federal Bureau...

May 24, 2023 07:00 AM
People's Republic of China State-Sponsored Cyber Actor Living off the Land to Evade Detection

The United States and international cybersecurity authorities are issuing this joint Cybersecurity Advisory (CSA) to highlight a recently...

May 24, 2023 07:00 AM
Volt Typhoon targets US critical infrastructure with living-off-the-land techniques

The attack is carried out by Volt Typhoon, a state-sponsored actor based in China that typically focuses on espionage and information gathering.

November 27, 2022 08:00 AM
Building fun into cybersecurity? Gamification is the way

As organizations look to their people to ensure cyber resilience, sustained training and retraining become an important aspect in the...

faq

Frequently Asked Questions

Explore insights on cybersecurity incidents, risk posture, and Rankiteo's assessments.

DL CyberSecurity History Information

Official Website of Directions for Living

The official website of Directions for Living is http://www.directionsforliving.org.

Directions for Living’s AI-Generated Cybersecurity Score

According to Rankiteo, Directions for Living’s AI-generated cybersecurity score is 654, reflecting their Weak security posture.

How many security badges does Directions for Living’ have ?

According to Rankiteo, Directions for Living currently holds 0 security badges, indicating that no recognized compliance certifications are currently verified for the organization.

Does Directions for Living have SOC 2 Type 1 certification ?

According to Rankiteo, Directions for Living is not certified under SOC 2 Type 1.

Does Directions for Living have SOC 2 Type 2 certification ?

According to Rankiteo, Directions for Living does not hold a SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Does Directions for Living comply with GDPR ?

According to Rankiteo, Directions for Living is not listed as GDPR compliant.

Does Directions for Living have PCI DSS certification ?

According to Rankiteo, Directions for Living does not currently maintain PCI DSS compliance.

Does Directions for Living comply with HIPAA ?

According to Rankiteo, Directions for Living is not compliant with HIPAA regulations.

Does Directions for Living have ISO 27001 certification ?

According to Rankiteo,Directions for Living is not certified under ISO 27001, indicating the absence of a formally recognized information security management framework.

Industry Classification of Directions for Living

Directions for Living operates primarily in the Mental Health Care industry.

Number of Employees at Directions for Living

Directions for Living employs approximately 206 people worldwide.

Subsidiaries Owned by Directions for Living

Directions for Living presently has no subsidiaries across any sectors.

Directions for Living’s LinkedIn Followers

Directions for Living’s official LinkedIn profile has approximately 3,038 followers.

NAICS Classification of Directions for Living

Directions for Living is classified under the NAICS code 62133, which corresponds to Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians).

Directions for Living’s Presence on Crunchbase

No, Directions for Living does not have a profile on Crunchbase.

Directions for Living’s Presence on LinkedIn

Yes, Directions for Living maintains an official LinkedIn profile, which is actively utilized for branding and talent engagement, which can be accessed here: https://www.linkedin.com/company/directions-for-living.

Cybersecurity Incidents Involving Directions for Living

As of December 01, 2025, Rankiteo reports that Directions for Living has experienced 2 cybersecurity incidents.

Number of Peer and Competitor Companies

Directions for Living has an estimated 5,042 peer or competitor companies worldwide.

What types of cybersecurity incidents have occurred at Directions for Living ?

Incident Types: The types of cybersecurity incidents that have occurred include Ransomware.

Incident Details

Can you provide details on each incident ?

Incident : Ransomware Attack

Title: Ransomware Attack on Directions for Living

Description: Directions for Living (DFL) in Florida experienced a ransomware attack on July 5, 2021 after an unauthorized third party had gained access to its systems 'via a firewall vulnerability' and encrypted some of its systems.

Date Detected: 2021-07-05

Type: Ransomware Attack

Attack Vector: Firewall Vulnerability

Vulnerability Exploited: Firewall Vulnerability

Threat Actor: Unauthorized third party

Incident : Data Breach

Title: Data Breach at Directions for Living

Description: The Maine Office of the Attorney General reported a data breach involving Directions for Living on September 15, 2021. The breach, discovered on July 17, 2021, was a ransomware attack that affected four Maine residents and potentially compromised protected health information, including Social Security numbers.

Date Detected: 2021-07-17

Date Publicly Disclosed: 2021-09-15

Type: Data Breach

Attack Vector: Ransomware

What are the most common types of attacks the company has faced ?

Common Attack Types: The most common types of attacks the company has faced is Ransomware.

How does the company identify the attack vectors used in incidents ?

Identification of Attack Vectors: The company identifies the attack vectors used in incidents through Firewall Vulnerability.

Impact of the Incidents

What was the impact of each incident ?

Incident : Ransomware Attack DIR22525123

Data Compromised: First and last names, Addresses, Dates of birth, Social security numbers, Diagnostic codes used for billing purposes, Claims and insurance information, Name of health care provider, Date of health care services, Certain other health information

Systems Affected: Some of its systems

Incident : Data Breach DIR442072725

Data Compromised: Protected health information, Social security numbers

What types of data are most commonly compromised in incidents ?

Commonly Compromised Data Types: The types of data most commonly compromised in incidents are Personally Identifiable Information (Pii), Protected Health Information (Phi), , Protected Health Information, Social Security Numbers and .

Which entities were affected by each incident ?

Incident : Ransomware Attack DIR22525123

Entity Name: Directions for Living

Entity Type: Healthcare Provider

Industry: Healthcare

Location: Florida

Customers Affected: 19494

Incident : Data Breach DIR442072725

Entity Name: Directions for Living

Entity Type: Organization

Industry: Healthcare

Location: Maine

Customers Affected: 4

Data Breach Information

What type of data was compromised in each breach ?

Incident : Ransomware Attack DIR22525123

Type of Data Compromised: Personally identifiable information (pii), Protected health information (phi)

Number of Records Exposed: 19494

Sensitivity of Data: High

Data Encryption: Yes

Personally Identifiable Information: Yes

Incident : Data Breach DIR442072725

Type of Data Compromised: Protected health information, Social security numbers

Number of Records Exposed: 4

Sensitivity of Data: High

Ransomware Information

Was ransomware involved in any of the incidents ?

Incident : Ransomware Attack DIR22525123

Data Encryption: Yes

References

Where can I find more information about each incident ?

Incident : Data Breach DIR442072725

Source: Maine Office of the Attorney General

Date Accessed: 2021-09-15

Where can stakeholders find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices ?

Additional Resources: Stakeholders can find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices at and Source: Maine Office of the Attorney GeneralDate Accessed: 2021-09-15.

Stakeholder and Customer Advisories

Were there any advisories issued to stakeholders or customers for each incident ?

Incident : Ransomware Attack DIR22525123

Customer Advisories: Single-bureau credit monitoring offered to all affected

What advisories does the company provide to stakeholders and customers following an incident ?

Advisories Provided: The company provides the following advisories to stakeholders and customers following an incident: was Single-bureau credit monitoring offered to all affected.

Initial Access Broker

How did the initial access broker gain entry for each incident ?

Incident : Ransomware Attack DIR22525123

Entry Point: Firewall Vulnerability

Additional Questions

General Information

Who was the attacking group in the last incident ?

Last Attacking Group: The attacking group in the last incident was an Unauthorized third party.

Incident Details

What was the most recent incident detected ?

Most Recent Incident Detected: The most recent incident detected was on 2021-07-05.

What was the most recent incident publicly disclosed ?

Most Recent Incident Publicly Disclosed: The most recent incident publicly disclosed was on 2021-09-15.

Impact of the Incidents

What was the most significant data compromised in an incident ?

Most Significant Data Compromised: The most significant data compromised in an incident were First and last names, Addresses, Dates of birth, Social security numbers, Diagnostic codes used for billing purposes, Claims and insurance information, Name of health care provider, Date of health care services, Certain other health information, , Protected health information, Social Security numbers and .

Data Breach Information

What was the most sensitive data compromised in a breach ?

Most Sensitive Data Compromised: The most sensitive data compromised in a breach were Name of health care provider, Protected health information, Diagnostic codes used for billing purposes, Addresses, Social security numbers, Claims and insurance information, First and last names, Certain other health information, Social Security numbers, Date of health care services and Dates of birth.

What was the number of records exposed in the most significant breach ?

Number of Records Exposed in Most Significant Breach: The number of records exposed in the most significant breach was 292.0.

References

What is the most recent source of information about an incident ?

Most Recent Source: The most recent source of information about an incident is Maine Office of the Attorney General.

Stakeholder and Customer Advisories

What was the most recent customer advisory issued ?

Most Recent Customer Advisory: The most recent customer advisory issued was an Single-bureau credit monitoring offered to all affected.

Initial Access Broker

What was the most recent entry point used by an initial access broker ?

Most Recent Entry Point: The most recent entry point used by an initial access broker was an Firewall Vulnerability.

cve

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Access Data Using Our API

SubsidiaryImage

Get company history

curl -i -X GET 'https://api.rankiteo.com/underwriter-getcompany-history?linkedin_id=directions-for-living' -H 'apikey: YOUR_API_KEY_HERE'

What Do We Measure ?

revertimgrevertimgrevertimgrevertimg
Incident
revertimgrevertimgrevertimgrevertimg
Finding
revertimgrevertimgrevertimgrevertimg
Grade
revertimgrevertimgrevertimgrevertimg
Digital Assets

Every week, Rankiteo analyzes billions of signals to give organizations a sharper, faster view of emerging risks. With deeper, more actionable intelligence at their fingertips, security teams can outpace threat actors, respond instantly to Zero-Day attacks, and dramatically shrink their risk exposure window.

These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:

Network Security

Identify exposed access points, detect misconfigured SSL certificates, and uncover vulnerabilities across the network infrastructure.

SBOM (Software Bill of Materials)

Gain visibility into the software components used within an organization to detect vulnerabilities, manage risk, and ensure supply chain security.

CMDB (Configuration Management Database)

Monitor and manage all IT assets and their configurations to ensure accurate, real-time visibility across the company's technology environment.

Threat Intelligence

Leverage real-time insights on active threats, malware campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities to proactively defend against evolving cyberattacks.

Top LeftTop RightBottom LeftBottom Right
Rankiteo is a unified scoring and risk platform that analyzes billions of signals weekly to help organizations gain faster, more actionable insights into emerging threats. Empowering teams to outpace adversaries and reduce exposure.
Users Love Us Badge