Comparison Overview
Direction interministérielle du numérique (DINUM)

Direction interministérielle du numérique (DINUM)
20, Avenue de Ségur, Paris, 75007, FR
Last Update: 12/06/2026
Informations pratiques, projets, initiatives, chiffres et résultats, mais aussi portraits des acteurs qui transforment le numérique dans l’État : suivez sur cette page l’actualité gouvernementale du numérique au service de l'efficacité de l'action publique, en temps rée...

Transportation Security Administration (TSA)
601 12th Street South, Arlington, 22202, US
Last Update: 02/04/2026
The Transportation Security Administration (TSA) is a component agency of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS), committed to securing the nation’s transportation systems to ensure safe and efficient travel for all. Our mission is to protect the American people...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Direction interministérielle du numérique (DINUM)







Transportation Security Administration (TSA)






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)
Direction interministérielle du numérique (DINUM) has 108.33% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Transportation Security Administration (TSA) in 2026.
Incident History - Direction interministérielle du numérique (DINUM) (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Direction interministérielle du numérique (DINUM) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Transportation Security Administration (TSA) (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Transportation Security Administration (TSA) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Direction interministérielle du numérique (DINUM)

Transportation Security Administration (TSA)
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains a path traversal vulnerability in MultiAgentMonitor that fails to sanitize agent IDs when building file paths. Attackers can include traversal sequences like ../ in agent IDs to read, write, or overwrite arbitrary files, enabling sensitive disclosure, denial of service, or code execution.
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains an information disclosure vulnerability in the MultiAgentLedger component that allows attackers to access sensitive data by registering agents with duplicate IDs. Attackers can exploit the lack of agent ID uniqueness enforcement to share ledger instances and expose system prompts and conversation history between agents.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 contains a cross-origin agent execution vulnerability in the AGUI endpoint that allows remote attackers to trigger arbitrary agent execution. The POST /agui endpoint lacks authentication and hardcodes Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * headers, combined with Starlette's Content-Type-agnostic JSON parsing, enabling attackers to bypass CORS preflight checks via simple requests and exfiltrate sensitive agent responses including tool execution results and environment data.
PraisonAI before 4.5.128 contains an arbitrary shell command execution vulnerability where the UI modules hardcode approval_mode to auto, overriding administrator configuration from PRAISON_APPROVAL_MODE environment variable. Authenticated attackers can instruct the LLM agent to execute arbitrary shell commands via subprocess.run with shell=True, bypassing the manual approval gate and insufficient command sanitization blocklists.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 caches tool approval decisions by tool name only, not by invocation arguments, allowing subsequent execute_command calls to bypass approval prompts. Attackers can exploit this by obtaining initial approval for a benign command, then silently exfiltrate API keys and credentials via subsequent shell commands without user consent.