Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Direction interministérielle du numérique (DINUM)Direction interministérielle du numérique (DINUM)
VS
State of MichiganState of Michigan
Direction interministérielle du numérique (DINUM)

Direction interministérielle du numérique (DINUM)

20, Avenue de Ségur, Paris, 75007, FR

Last Update: 12/06/2026

View Profile
477/1000Critical

Informations pratiques, projets, initiatives, chiffres et résultats, mais aussi portraits des acteurs qui transforment le numérique dans l’État : suivez sur cette page l’actualité gouvernementale du numérique au service de l'efficacité de l'action publique, en temps rée...

NAICS:92
NAICS Definition:Public Administration
Employees:298
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
3
Known data breaches
3
Attack type number
1
State of Michigan

State of Michigan

State Capitol, Lansing, Michigan, US, 48913

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
789/1000Fair

Every day the contributions and achievements of State of Michigan employees have a direct impact on over 10 million Michiganders across the state. If you're looking for a fulfilling career in state government that can make a real difference in the lives of others, you c...

NAICS:92
NAICS Definition:Public Administration
Employees:35,704
Subsidiaries:43
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Direction interministérielle du numérique (DINUM)

Direction interministérielle du numérique (DINUM)

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
State of Michigan

State of Michigan

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)

Direction interministérielle du numérique (DINUM) has 104.08% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for State of Michigan in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Direction interministérielle du numérique (DINUM) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Direction interministérielle du numérique (DINUM) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - State of Michigan (X = Date, Y = Severity)

State of Michigan cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Direction interministérielle du numérique (DINUM)

Direction interministérielle du numérique (DINUM)

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
DIRIFIFRE1781260189
🔒 Incident : Breach
ANSFREDIR1781008517
🔒 Incident : Breach
DIR1770028271
State of Michigan

State of Michigan

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Direction interministérielle du numérique (DINUM) company and State of Michigan company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Direction interministérielle du numérique (DINUM) company and State of Michigan company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Direction interministérielle du numérique (DINUM) company and State of Michigan company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Direction interministérielle du numérique (DINUM) company and State of Michigan company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Direction interministérielle du numérique (DINUM) company and State of Michigan company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Direction interministérielle du numérique (DINUM) company and State of Michigan company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Direction interministérielle du numérique (DINUM) company and State of Michigan company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Direction interministérielle du numérique (DINUM) company and State of Michigan company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Direction interministérielle du numérique (DINUM) company and State of Michigan company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Direction interministérielle du numérique (DINUM) company and State of Michigan company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Direction interministérielle du numérique (DINUM) company and State of Michigan company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Direction interministérielle du numérique (DINUM) and State of Michigan, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Direction interministérielle du numérique (DINUM) and State of Michigan, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Direction interministérielle du numérique (DINUM) or State of Michigan ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Direction interministérielle du numérique (DINUM) or State of Michigan ?
Between Direction interministérielle du numérique (DINUM) and State of Michigan, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Direction interministérielle du numérique (DINUM) and State of Michigan, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-22061
SUMMARY

Trident versions v25.02.1 through v26.06.1 are susceptible to a vulnerability that could allow an authenticated attacker with access to debug logs to view LUKS passphrases or SMB Active Directory credentials.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-09
UPDATED
Date2026-10-09
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.2
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-108269
SUMMARY

Remote Attestation TLS Clients provides multi-language utilities for verifying attested TLS connections. Prior to 0.5.0, the Rust and Go RA-TLS challenge verifiers accepted quote ReportData that was bound to the certificate public key and client nonce but not to the active TLS session before permitting application traffic. An attacker who obtained an enclave TLS private key could relay a genuine quote onto another connection, causing the clients to accept an attacker-terminated connection as the attested enclave. This issue is fixed in 0.5.0.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-09
UPDATED
Date2026-10-09
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-108268
SUMMARY

Enclave OS Virtual runs container workloads inside confidential virtual machines with end-to-end attestation. Prior to tdx-v0.2.43 and tdx-gpu-v0.6.27, the TDX/GPU RA-TLS certificate issuer placed the certificate public-key hash and client nonce in quote ReportData but omitted a value bound to the active TLS session. An attacker who obtained an enclave TLS private key could relay a genuine quote onto another connection, causing a relying party to accept an attacker-terminated connection as the attested enclave. This issue is fixed in tdx-v0.2.43 and tdx-gpu-v0.6.27.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-09
UPDATED
Date2026-10-09
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-108267
SUMMARY

Privasys Go is a maintained fork of the Go programming language that adds RA-TLS support to crypto/tls. Prior to privasys-v0.5.1-go1.26.5, challenge-mode RA-TLS certificates bound quote ReportData to the certificate public key and client nonce but not to the active TLS session. An attacker who obtained an enclave TLS private key could relay a genuine quote onto another connection, causing a relying party to accept a handshake terminated by the attacker as an attested enclave connection. This issue is fixed in privasys-v0.5.1-go1.26.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-09
UPDATED
Date2026-10-09
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-92705
SUMMARY

Aegisub is a cross-platform advanced subtitle editor. From 3.2.0 to 3.4.2, Aegisub automatically loads Automation scripts referenced by `Automation Scripts` metadata in `ASS` subtitle projects without asking whether the user trusts the scripts or their authors. An attacker can distribute a crafted `ASS` file together with a referenced malicious Automation script, and opening the `AS`  file executes arbitrary code with the privileges of the Aegisub process. From 3.4.0 to 3.4.2, inconsistent handling of embedded `NUL` characters between extension validation and filesystem operations additionally allows a crafted `ASS/Lua` polyglot to reference and execute itself as a single-file variant. The vulnerability is fixed in Aegisub 3.5.0.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-09
UPDATED
Date2026-10-09
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8