Comparison Overview

Direct Energy

VS

Southern California Edison (SCE)

Direct Energy

910 Louisiana St, B200, Houston, Texas, US, 77002
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 700 and 749

Direct Energy is one of North America's largest retail providers of electricity, natural gas and home and business energy-related services. We've been around for decades and are proud to serve our community with a variety of plans to meet the needs of our customers.

NAICS: 22
NAICS Definition: Utilities
Employees: 2,147
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Southern California Edison (SCE)

2244 Walnut Grove Ave., None, Rosemead, CA, US, 91770
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799

As one of the nation’s largest electric utilities, we’re bringing more clean and renewable sources of energy to Southern California. From energy storage to transportation electrification, our employees are working on innovative projects that will help cut emissions and greenhouse gases to provide cleaner air for everyone. We have diverse teams, made up of inventors, doers and problem solvers. The people here at SCE don't just keep the lights on. The mission is so much bigger. We are fueling the kind of innovation that is changing an entire industry, and quite possibly the planet. Follow us on LinkedIn and visit www.edisoncareers.com to learn more about who we are and how we’re working together to create a better tomorrow.

NAICS: 22
NAICS Definition: Utilities
Employees: 12,356
Subsidiaries: 2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/direct-energy.jpeg
Direct Energy
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sce.jpeg
Southern California Edison (SCE)
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Direct Energy
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Southern California Edison (SCE)
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Utilities Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Direct Energy in 2025.

Incidents vs Utilities Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Southern California Edison (SCE) in 2025.

Incident History — Direct Energy (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Direct Energy cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Southern California Edison (SCE) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Southern California Edison (SCE) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/direct-energy.jpeg
Direct Energy
Incidents

Date Detected: 11/2020
Type:Ransomware
Attack Vector: Ransomware
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sce.jpeg
Southern California Edison (SCE)
Incidents

Date Detected: 11/2022
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Inadvertent Disclosure
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Southern California Edison (SCE) company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Direct Energy company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Direct Energy and Southern California Edison (SCE) have experienced a similar number of publicly disclosed cyber incidents.

In the current year, Southern California Edison (SCE) company and Direct Energy company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Direct Energy company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Southern California Edison (SCE) company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Southern California Edison (SCE) company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Direct Energy company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Southern California Edison (SCE) company nor Direct Energy company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Direct Energy company nor Southern California Edison (SCE) company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Direct Energy nor Southern California Edison (SCE) holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Southern California Edison (SCE) company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Direct Energy company.

Southern California Edison (SCE) company employs more people globally than Direct Energy company, reflecting its scale as a Utilities.

Neither Direct Energy nor Southern California Edison (SCE) holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Direct Energy nor Southern California Edison (SCE) holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Direct Energy nor Southern California Edison (SCE) holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Direct Energy nor Southern California Edison (SCE) holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Direct Energy nor Southern California Edison (SCE) holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Direct Energy nor Southern California Edison (SCE) holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

WeGIA is an open source Web Manager for Institutions with a focus on Portuguese language users. Versions 3.5.4 and below contain a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the /WeGIA/html/geral/configurar_senhas.php endpoint. The application does not sanitize user-controlled data before rendering it inside the employee selection dropdown. The application retrieves employee names from the database and injects them directly into HTML <option> elements without proper escaping. This issue is fixed in version 3.5.5.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

ZITADEL is an open-source identity infrastructure tool. Versions 4.0.0-rc.1 through 4.7.0 are vulnerable to DOM-Based XSS through the Zitadel V2 logout endpoint. The /logout endpoint insecurely routes to a value that is supplied in the post_logout_redirect GET parameter. As a result, unauthenticated remote attacker can execute malicious JS code on Zitadel users’ browsers. To carry out an attack, multiple user sessions need to be active in the same browser, however, account takeover is mitigated when using Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA) or Passwordless authentication. This issue is fixed in version 4.7.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

ZITADEL is an open-source identity infrastructure tool. Versions 4.7.0 and below are vulnerable to an unauthenticated, full-read SSRF vulnerability. The ZITADEL Login UI (V2) treats the x-zitadel-forward-host header as a trusted fallback for all deployments, including self-hosted instances. This allows an unauthenticated attacker to force the server to make HTTP requests to arbitrary domains, such as internal addresses, and read the responses, enabling data exfiltration and bypassing network-segmentation controls. This issue is fixed in version 4.7.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
Description

NiceGUI is a Python-based UI framework. Versions 3.3.1 and below are vulnerable to directory traversal through the App.add_media_files() function, which allows a remote attacker to read arbitrary files on the server filesystem. This issue is fixed in version 3.4.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

FreePBX Endpoint Manager is a module for managing telephony endpoints in FreePBX systems. Versions are vulnerable to authentication bypass when the authentication type is set to "webserver." When providing an Authorization header with an arbitrary value, a session is associated with the target user regardless of valid credentials. This issue is fixed in versions 16.0.44 and 17.0.23.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X