Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

DingTalkDingTalk
VS
NEC CorporationNEC Corporation
DingTalk

DingTalk

969 Wen Yi Xi Lu, Hangzhou, 311121, CN

Last Update: 28/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.dingtalk.jp/
750/1000Fair

DingTalkとは: DingTalkは、世界2,600万社以上の企業・組織に導入されている、AI時代の統合型ワークプラットフォームです。 あらゆる業界・業種に対応し、シンプルな業務から複雑なワークフローまで幅広くサポートしています。 「仕事をもっとシンプルに、もっとスマートに」をテーマに、AIを活用した新しいワークスタイルを日本の皆様にご提案しております。 DingTalkの主なソリューションをご紹介 AIオフィス統合プラットフォームチャット、会議、ドキュメント、勤怠、メールを1つのプラットフォームで完結。AIが要約・整理を自動化...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:70
Subsidiaries:23
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
NEC Corporation

NEC Corporation

7-1, Shiba 5-chome, Tokyo, 108-8001, JP

Last Update: 28/03/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
https://www.nec.com/en/
802/1000Good

NEC Corporation has established itself as a leader in the integration of IT and network technologies while promoting the brand statement of “Orchestrating a brighter world.” NEC enables businesses and communities to adapt to rapid changes taking place in both society an...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:17,897
Subsidiaries:16
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
DingTalk

DingTalk

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
NEC Corporation

NEC Corporation

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for DingTalk in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for NEC Corporation in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - DingTalk (X = Date, Y = Severity)

DingTalk cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - NEC Corporation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

NEC Corporation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
DingTalk

DingTalk

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
NEC Corporation

NEC Corporation

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between DingTalk company and NEC Corporation company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between DingTalk company and NEC Corporation company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between DingTalk company and NEC Corporation company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between DingTalk company and NEC Corporation company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between DingTalk company and NEC Corporation company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between DingTalk company and NEC Corporation company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between DingTalk company and NEC Corporation company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between DingTalk company and NEC Corporation company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between DingTalk company and NEC Corporation company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between DingTalk company and NEC Corporation company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between DingTalk company and NEC Corporation company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between DingTalk and NEC Corporation, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between DingTalk and NEC Corporation, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - DingTalk or NEC Corporation ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - DingTalk or NEC Corporation ?
Between DingTalk and NEC Corporation, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between DingTalk and NEC Corporation, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-67978
SUMMARY

An issue in the SBN UDP interface of NASA cFS v7.0.1 allows attackers to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via transmitting a crafted SBN frame.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-03
UPDATED
Date2026-08-03
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-67673
SUMMARY

A stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability exists in the cmd_edl function of OreSat Firmware v1.0. The vulnerability is triggered when processing the edl fw_flash command, where the <filename> argument is copied to a 64-byte stack buffer via memcpy without proper length validation. An attacker with physical access to the UART3 serial interface can exploit this vulnerability by sending a maliciously crafted command with an oversized filename parameter,

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-03
UPDATED
Date2026-08-03
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-48399
SUMMARY

Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) is affected by a Violation of Secure Design Principles vulnerability that could result in a Security feature bypass. An attacker could leverage this vulnerability to bypass security measures and gain unauthorized read access. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-03
UPDATED
Date2026-08-03
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-48333
SUMMARY

Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) is affected by an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability that could result in privilege escalation. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to gain elevated privileges. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-03
UPDATED
Date2026-08-03
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-48331
SUMMARY

Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) is affected by a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could result in privilege escalation. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. Scope is changed.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-03
UPDATED
Date2026-08-03
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9