Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Dimensions, Inc.Dimensions, Inc.
VS
CHINA STATE CONSTRUCTION (CSCEC)CHINA STATE CONSTRUCTION (CSCEC)
Dimensions, Inc.

Dimensions, Inc.

10752 Deerwood Park Blvd., Jacksonville, 32256-0597, US

Last Update: 26/08/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.dimensionsinc.org
749/1000Moderate

A National Consulting - Architecture - Construction - Project Management Firm Dimensions offers strong management and team building leadership skills with over 20 years of extensive and comprehensive experience in the fast-track project delivery in all phases of cons...

NAICS:54131
NAICS Definition:Architectural Services
Employees:2
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
CHINA STATE CONSTRUCTION (CSCEC)

CHINA STATE CONSTRUCTION (CSCEC)

Building 3, Courtyard 5, Anding Road, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100029, CN

Last Update: 21/09/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.cscec.com.cn/
798/1000Fair

China State Construction Engineering Corporation Ltd (in short: China Construction; Stock code: 601668), formally established on December 10, 2007, was co-initiated by four Fortune Global 500 enterprises: China State Construction Engineering Corp. (CSCEC), China Nationa...

NAICS:54131
NAICS Definition:Architectural Services
Employees:37,998
Subsidiaries:33
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Dimensions, Inc.

Dimensions, Inc.

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
CHINA STATE CONSTRUCTION (CSCEC)

CHINA STATE CONSTRUCTION (CSCEC)

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Architecture and Planning Industry Avg (This Year)

Dimensions, Inc. has 57.08% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs Architecture and Planning Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for CHINA STATE CONSTRUCTION (CSCEC) in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Dimensions, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Dimensions, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - CHINA STATE CONSTRUCTION (CSCEC) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

CHINA STATE CONSTRUCTION (CSCEC) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Dimensions, Inc.

Dimensions, Inc.

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
THECAR1787783634
CHINA STATE CONSTRUCTION (CSCEC)

CHINA STATE CONSTRUCTION (CSCEC)

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Dimensions, Inc. company and CHINA STATE CONSTRUCTION (CSCEC) company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Dimensions, Inc. company and CHINA STATE CONSTRUCTION (CSCEC) company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Dimensions, Inc. company and CHINA STATE CONSTRUCTION (CSCEC) company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Dimensions, Inc. company and CHINA STATE CONSTRUCTION (CSCEC) company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Dimensions, Inc. company and CHINA STATE CONSTRUCTION (CSCEC) company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Dimensions, Inc. company and CHINA STATE CONSTRUCTION (CSCEC) company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Dimensions, Inc. company and CHINA STATE CONSTRUCTION (CSCEC) company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Dimensions, Inc. company and CHINA STATE CONSTRUCTION (CSCEC) company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Dimensions, Inc. company and CHINA STATE CONSTRUCTION (CSCEC) company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Dimensions, Inc. company and CHINA STATE CONSTRUCTION (CSCEC) company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Dimensions, Inc. company and CHINA STATE CONSTRUCTION (CSCEC) company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Dimensions, Inc. and CHINA STATE CONSTRUCTION (CSCEC), which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Dimensions, Inc. and CHINA STATE CONSTRUCTION (CSCEC), which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Dimensions, Inc. or CHINA STATE CONSTRUCTION (CSCEC) ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Dimensions, Inc. or CHINA STATE CONSTRUCTION (CSCEC) ?
Between Dimensions, Inc. and CHINA STATE CONSTRUCTION (CSCEC), which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Dimensions, Inc. and CHINA STATE CONSTRUCTION (CSCEC), which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-84411
SUMMARY

The web management service in affected RouterOS versions contains an integer underflow in its HTTP request body handling that is reachable before authentication. This can be leveraged by an unauthenticated network attacker to achieve arbitrary code execution as root, or to cause a denial of service, using a single crafted request.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-02
UPDATED
Date2026-10-02
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 9.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-105051
SUMMARY

Denuvo Anti-Tamper through 2026-03-04 allows bypass of a hypervisor presence check via CPUID interception (SimpleSvm.sys on AMD; hyperkd.sys and hyperhv.dll on Intel).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-02
UPDATED
Date2026-10-02
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 1.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 1.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
0.5
CVE-2026-105050
SUMMARY

PeaZip before 11.3.0, in a non-default configuration, is vulnerable to OS command injection via a filename in an archive because "quotation character already used in the string" is mishandled.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-02
UPDATED
Date2026-10-02
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-105049
SUMMARY

Zilliz Attu before 3.0.0 has a Playground feature that does not require authentication for proxying arbitrary HTTP and HTTPS requests to URLs on the public internet.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-02
UPDATED
Date2026-10-02
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-105048
SUMMARY

The Playground feature of Zilliz Attu before 3.0.0 allows SSRF (proxying of requests to private IP addresses).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-02
UPDATED
Date2026-10-02
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.0
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2