Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

DDMDDM
VS
BinanceBinance
DDM

DDM

, , Rabat , , MA, None

Last Update: 12/12/2025

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
techteamsynergy.com
766/1000Fair

CHR

NAICS:513
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:65
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Binance

Binance

Everywhere, 0, OO

Last Update: 22/09/2026

View Profile
Between 0 and 549
https://www.binance.com/
291/1000Critical

Binance is the world’s leading blockchain ecosystem and cryptocurrency infrastructure provider with a product suite that includes the world's largest digital asset exchange and much more. Trusted by over 200 millions of users worldwide, the Binance platform is dedicate...

NAICS:513
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:14,567
Subsidiaries:3
12-month incidents
5
Known data breaches
6
Attack type number
3

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
DDM

DDM

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Binance

Binance

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Technology, Information and Internet Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for DDM in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Technology, Information and Internet Industry Avg (This Year)

Binance has 395.05% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - DDM (X = Date, Y = Severity)

DDM cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Binance (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Binance cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
DDM

DDM

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Binance

Binance

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
BINDIRMER1790037002
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
BINMEX1787063171
🔒 Incident : Breach
DIR1786633007

FAQ

Between DDM company and Binance company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between DDM company and Binance company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between DDM company and Binance company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between DDM company and Binance company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between DDM company and Binance company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between DDM company and Binance company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between DDM company and Binance company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between DDM company and Binance company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between DDM company and Binance company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between DDM company and Binance company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between DDM company and Binance company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between DDM and Binance, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between DDM and Binance, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - DDM or Binance ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - DDM or Binance ?
Between DDM and Binance, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between DDM and Binance, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-97032
SUMMARY

HTTP/2 servers could end up crashing due to inadvertently modifying its HPACK encoder concurrently. This happens because the server modifies the HPACK encoder from two goroutines without synchronization: one uses the encoder to encode a HEADERS frame as part of a response sent to a client and the other modifies the encoder's table size when handling a SETTINGS frame containing SETTINGS_HEADER_TABLE_SIZE that a client sends. A malicious client can repeatedly send a request while changing the header table size to crash the server.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-97031
SUMMARY

Multiple ECH outer extension references are not permitted under RFC 9849; previously, a client could send a well-crafted packet that could trigger memory exhaustion in the server process by specifying multiple references. We now reject these as malformed and curb the memory amplification vector as a result.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-97030
SUMMARY

A trusted template author may have previously written a valid template wherein the use of the 'yield' keyword would not be correctly escaped. We now ensure that valid keyword uses are escaped and non-keyword uses are not escaped.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-96207
SUMMARY

Improper certificate validation in Microsoft Partner Center allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-94510
SUMMARY

Authorization bypass through user-controlled key in Microsoft Bookings allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:H/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
5.3
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9