Comparison Overview

Dillard's Inc.

VS

Old Navy

Dillard's Inc.

1600 Cantrell Rd., Little Rock, AR, 72201, US
Last Update: 2026-01-17
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.Dillards.com

Dillard's, Inc. ranks among the nation's largest fashion apparel and home furnishings retailers with annual revenues exceeding $6.1 billion. The Company focuses on delivering maximum fashion and value to its shoppers by offering compelling apparel and home selections complemented by exceptional customer care. Dillard's stores offer a broad selection of merchandise and feature products from both national and exclusive brand sources. The Company operates nearly 300 Dillard's locations spanning 29 states, all with one nameplate - Dillard's.

NAICS: 43
NAICS Definition: Retail Trade
Employees: 18,751
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Old Navy

2 Folsom Street, San Francisco, 94158, US
Last Update: 2026-01-17
Between 800 and 849
https://jobs.gapinc.com/old-navy-home

Forget what you know about old-school industry rules. When you work at Old Navy, you’re choosing a different path. From day one, we’ve been on a mission to democratize fashion and make shopping fun again. Our teams make style accessible to everyone, creating high-quality, must-have fashion essentials for the whole family, with love, season after season. We opened our first store in 1994 in San Francisco and have been on a roll ever since. Today, customers can find fabulous fashion at affordable prices online and in one of our 1,000+ stores globally. Old Navy celebrates a workplace that’s just as diverse as our customers. Fun, fashion, family and value are at the heart of everything we do. We cultivate a community of playful personalities that thrive in a fast-paced environment where our employees can be their most authentic selves. Here, we’re family. Old Navy – a brand for everyone, a place for you!

NAICS: 43
NAICS Definition: Retail Trade
Employees: 29,072
Subsidiaries: 4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dillards.jpeg
Dillard's Inc.
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gap-inc.-old-navy.jpeg
Old Navy
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Dillard's Inc.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Old Navy
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Retail Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Dillard's Inc. in 2026.

Incidents vs Retail Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Old Navy in 2026.

Incident History — Dillard's Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Dillard's Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Old Navy (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Old Navy cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dillards.jpeg
Dillard's Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gap-inc.-old-navy.jpeg
Old Navy
Incidents

Date Detected: 12/2025
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 1/2010
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Old Navy company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Dillard's Inc. company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Old Navy company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Dillard's Inc. company has not reported any.

In the current year, Old Navy company and Dillard's Inc. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Old Navy company nor Dillard's Inc. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Old Navy company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Dillard's Inc. company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Old Navy company nor Dillard's Inc. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Dillard's Inc. company nor Old Navy company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Dillard's Inc. nor Old Navy holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Old Navy company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Dillard's Inc. company.

Old Navy company employs more people globally than Dillard's Inc. company, reflecting its scale as a Retail.

Neither Dillard's Inc. nor Old Navy holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Dillard's Inc. nor Old Navy holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Dillard's Inc. nor Old Navy holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Dillard's Inc. nor Old Navy holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Dillard's Inc. nor Old Navy holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Dillard's Inc. nor Old Navy holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Typemill is a flat-file, Markdown-based CMS designed for informational documentation websites. A reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) exists in the login error view template `login.twig` of versions 2.19.1 and below. The `username` value can be echoed back without proper contextual encoding when authentication fails. An attacker can execute script in the login page context. This issue has been fixed in version 2.19.2.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
References
Description

A DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in the DomainCheckerApp class within domain/script.js of Sourcecodester Domain Availability Checker v1.0. The vulnerability occurs because the application improperly handles user-supplied data in the createResultElement method by using the unsafe innerHTML property to render domain search results.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References
Description

A Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability exists in Sourcecodester Modern Image Gallery App v1.0 within the gallery/upload.php component. The application fails to properly validate uploaded file contents. Additionally, the application preserves the user-supplied file extension during the save process. This allows an unauthenticated attacker to upload arbitrary PHP code by spoofing the MIME type as an image, leading to full system compromise.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References
Description

A UNIX symbolic link following issue in the jailer component in Firecracker version v1.13.1 and earlier and 1.14.0 on Linux may allow a local host user with write access to the pre-created jailer directories to overwrite arbitrary host files via a symlink attack during the initialization copy at jailer startup, if the jailer is executed with root privileges. To mitigate this issue, users should upgrade to version v1.13.2 or 1.14.1 or above.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

An information disclosure vulnerability exists in the /srvs/membersrv/getCashiers endpoint of the Aptsys gemscms backend platform thru 2025-05-28. This unauthenticated endpoint returns a list of cashier accounts, including names, email addresses, usernames, and passwords hashed using MD5. As MD5 is a broken cryptographic function, the hashes can be easily reversed using public tools, exposing user credentials in plaintext. This allows remote attackers to perform unauthorized logins and potentially gain access to sensitive POS operations or backend functions.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References