Comparison Overview
Digital Recovery
Digital Recovery
Poweline RD , Pompano Beach , 33073, US
Last Update: 03/04/2026
Founded in 1998, Digital Recovery emerged in the aftermath of the Chernobyl virus (Win32/CIH), with a clear mission: to deliver advanced data recovery solutions. Our journey began through a strategic partnership with a U.S.-based data recovery lab, allowing us to acquir...
Diebold Nixdorf
350 Orchard Ave NE, North Canton, 44720, US
Last Update: 05/09/2026
Diebold Nixdorf automates, digitizes and transforms the way people bank and shop. Its integrated solutions connect digital and physical channels conveniently, securely and efficiently for millions of consumers every day. As an innovation partner for nearly all of the ...
Compliance Ranges Comparison
Digital Recovery
Diebold Nixdorf
Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Digital Recovery in 2026.
Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Diebold Nixdorf in 2026.
Incident History - Digital Recovery (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Digital Recovery cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Diebold Nixdorf (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Diebold Nixdorf cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents
Digital Recovery
Diebold Nixdorf
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to exposure of session tokens in the HTML response.
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to an XML external entity (XXE) injection flaw.
IBM Aspera Enterprise WebApps 1.0.0 through 1.0.6 could allow a local attacker to obtain sensitive information due to cleartext transmission of sensitive information.
IBM Planning Analytics 2.0, and 2.1 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a stack-based buffer overflow.
IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 can allow a man-in-the-middle attacker to present a forged TLS certificate, intercept the connection, and capture the IAM bearer Authorization header automatically attached by the session adapter. The captured token grants full platform-scope tenant API access, enabling the attacker to read and manipulate the victim's DataStage projects, flows, assets, and pipeline definitions. This is client-side SDK code running on the user's own machine, so exploitation requires an external network interceptor rather than a co-tenant in the shared cluster.