Comparison Overview
DigitalMint

DigitalMint
301 W Grand Ave, Chicago, 60654, US
Last Update: 28/04/2026
DigitalMint Cyber is a globally trusted leader in ransomware incident response, providing end-to-end support for organizations facing cyber extortion. From expert negotiations and sanction compliance to secure, compliant payment facilitation, we manage critical phases o...

KPMG US
345 Park Avenue, New York, NY, US, 10154
Last Update: 02/04/2026
KPMG is one of the world’s leading professional services firms and the fastest growing Big Four accounting firm in the United States. With 90+ offices and more than 36,000 employees and partners throughout the US, we’re leading the industry in new and exciting ways. Our...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

DigitalMint







KPMG US






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)
DigitalMint has 45.36% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for KPMG US in 2026.
Incident History - DigitalMint (X = Date, Y = Severity)
DigitalMint cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - KPMG US (X = Date, Y = Severity)
KPMG US cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

DigitalMint

KPMG US
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains a path traversal vulnerability in MultiAgentMonitor that fails to sanitize agent IDs when building file paths. Attackers can include traversal sequences like ../ in agent IDs to read, write, or overwrite arbitrary files, enabling sensitive disclosure, denial of service, or code execution.
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains an information disclosure vulnerability in the MultiAgentLedger component that allows attackers to access sensitive data by registering agents with duplicate IDs. Attackers can exploit the lack of agent ID uniqueness enforcement to share ledger instances and expose system prompts and conversation history between agents.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 contains a cross-origin agent execution vulnerability in the AGUI endpoint that allows remote attackers to trigger arbitrary agent execution. The POST /agui endpoint lacks authentication and hardcodes Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * headers, combined with Starlette's Content-Type-agnostic JSON parsing, enabling attackers to bypass CORS preflight checks via simple requests and exfiltrate sensitive agent responses including tool execution results and environment data.
PraisonAI before 4.5.128 contains an arbitrary shell command execution vulnerability where the UI modules hardcode approval_mode to auto, overriding administrator configuration from PRAISON_APPROVAL_MODE environment variable. Authenticated attackers can instruct the LLM agent to execute arbitrary shell commands via subprocess.run with shell=True, bypassing the manual approval gate and insufficient command sanitization blocklists.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 caches tool approval decisions by tool name only, not by invocation arguments, allowing subsequent execute_command calls to bypass approval prompts. Attackers can exploit this by obtaining initial approval for a benign command, then silently exfiltrate API keys and credentials via subsequent shell commands without user consent.