Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Diebold NixdorfDiebold Nixdorf
VS
FISFIS
Diebold Nixdorf

Diebold Nixdorf

350 Orchard Ave NE, North Canton, 44720, US

Last Update: 29/03/2026

View Profile
Between 650 and 699
http://DieboldNixdorf.com
673/1000Weak

Diebold Nixdorf automates, digitizes and transforms the way people bank and shop. Its integrated solutions connect digital and physical channels conveniently, securely and efficiently for millions of consumers every day. As an innovation partner for nearly all of the ...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:20,251
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
3
FIS

FIS

601 Riverside Ave, Jacksonville, FL, US, 32202

Last Update: 04/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.fisglobal.com/
799/1000Fair

Unlocking financial technology. Bringing the world’s money into harmony. At FIS, we advance the way the world pays, banks, and invests. With decades of expertise, we provide financial technology solutions to financial institutions, businesses, and developers. Headquart...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:45,534
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Diebold Nixdorf

Diebold Nixdorf

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
FIS

FIS

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Diebold Nixdorf in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for FIS in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Diebold Nixdorf (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Diebold Nixdorf cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - FIS (X = Date, Y = Severity)

FIS cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Diebold Nixdorf

Diebold Nixdorf

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
DIE1772015252
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
DIE000081024
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
DIE84429723
FIS

FIS

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
FIS454072625

FAQ

Between Diebold Nixdorf company and FIS company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Diebold Nixdorf company and FIS company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Diebold Nixdorf company and FIS company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Diebold Nixdorf company and FIS company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Diebold Nixdorf company and FIS company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Diebold Nixdorf company and FIS company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Diebold Nixdorf company and FIS company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Diebold Nixdorf company and FIS company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Diebold Nixdorf company and FIS company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Diebold Nixdorf company and FIS company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Diebold Nixdorf company and FIS company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Diebold Nixdorf and FIS, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Diebold Nixdorf and FIS, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Diebold Nixdorf or FIS ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Diebold Nixdorf or FIS ?
Between Diebold Nixdorf and FIS, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Diebold Nixdorf and FIS, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-67978
SUMMARY

An issue in the SBN UDP interface of NASA cFS v7.0.1 allows attackers to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via transmitting a crafted SBN frame.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-03
UPDATED
Date2026-08-03
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-67673
SUMMARY

A stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability exists in the cmd_edl function of OreSat Firmware v1.0. The vulnerability is triggered when processing the edl fw_flash command, where the <filename> argument is copied to a 64-byte stack buffer via memcpy without proper length validation. An attacker with physical access to the UART3 serial interface can exploit this vulnerability by sending a maliciously crafted command with an oversized filename parameter,

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-03
UPDATED
Date2026-08-03
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-48399
SUMMARY

Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) is affected by a Violation of Secure Design Principles vulnerability that could result in a Security feature bypass. An attacker could leverage this vulnerability to bypass security measures and gain unauthorized read access. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-03
UPDATED
Date2026-08-03
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-48333
SUMMARY

Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) is affected by an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability that could result in privilege escalation. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to gain elevated privileges. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-03
UPDATED
Date2026-08-03
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-48331
SUMMARY

Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) is affected by a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could result in privilege escalation. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. Scope is changed.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-03
UPDATED
Date2026-08-03
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9