Comparison Overview
Department of Information and Communications Technology
Department of Information and Communications Technology
Studio 7, 807 Epifanio de los Santos Avenue, Diliman, Quezon City, Metro Manila, PH, 1103
Last Update: 26/09/2026
The Department of Information and Communications Technology is mandated by Republic Act (RA) 10844 or the DICT Act of 2015 to be the primary policy, planning, coordinating, implementing, and administrative entity of the Executive Branch of the government that will plan,...
State of Florida
US
Last Update: 03/04/2026
Join Florida’s talented workforce to fulfill your professional goals and achieve a meaningful career. Our talented public servants work hard to serve more than 19 million residents across Florida, and you, too, can realize success in the Sunshine State. Working in F...
Compliance Ranges Comparison
Department of Information and Communications Technology
State of Florida
Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)
Department of Information and Communications Technology has 32.43% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for State of Florida in 2026.
Incident History - Department of Information and Communications Technology (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Department of Information and Communications Technology cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - State of Florida (X = Date, Y = Severity)
State of Florida cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents
Department of Information and Communications Technology
State of Florida
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to exposure of session tokens in the HTML response.
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to an XML external entity (XXE) injection flaw.
IBM Aspera Enterprise WebApps 1.0.0 through 1.0.6 could allow a local attacker to obtain sensitive information due to cleartext transmission of sensitive information.
IBM Planning Analytics 2.0, and 2.1 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a stack-based buffer overflow.
IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 can allow a man-in-the-middle attacker to present a forged TLS certificate, intercept the connection, and capture the IAM bearer Authorization header automatically attached by the session adapter. The captured token grants full platform-scope tenant API access, enabling the attacker to read and manipulate the victim's DataStage projects, flows, assets, and pipeline definitions. This is client-side SDK code running on the user's own machine, so exploitation requires an external network interceptor rather than a co-tenant in the shared cluster.