Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Department of Information and Communications TechnologyDepartment of Information and Communications Technology
VS
Malmö stadMalmö stad
Department of Information and Communications Technology

Department of Information and Communications Technology

Studio 7, 807 Epifanio de los Santos Avenue, Diliman, Quezon City, 1103, PH

Last Update: 04/04/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
https://dict.gov.ph/
704/1000Moderate

The Department of Information and Communications Technology is mandated by Republic Act (RA) 10844 or the DICT Act of 2015 to be the primary policy, planning, coordinating, implementing, and administrative entity of the Executive Branch of the government that will plan,...

NAICS:92
NAICS Definition:Public Administration
Employees:716
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
1
Malmö stad

Malmö stad

August Palms plats 1, Malmö, 205 80, SE

Last Update: 03/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://malmo.se/jobb
779/1000Fair

Bli en samhällsbyggare – jobba i Malmö stad! Genom att arbeta i Malmö stad får du möjlighet att arbeta med hållbar samhällsutveckling. Som en samhällsbyggare spelar du en viktig roll i Malmös utveckling och därför ser vi oss som framtidens arbetsplats. Människors lik...

NAICS:92
NAICS Definition:Public Administration
Employees:14,500
Subsidiaries:5
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Department of Information and Communications Technology

Department of Information and Communications Technology

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Malmö stad

Malmö stad

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Department of Information and Communications Technology in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Malmö stad in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Department of Information and Communications Technology (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Department of Information and Communications Technology cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Malmö stad (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Malmö stad cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Department of Information and Communications Technology

Department of Information and Communications Technology

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
DIC3833538092225
🔒 Incident : Breach
DIC2762527111925
Malmö stad

Malmö stad

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Department of Information and Communications Technology company and Malmö stad company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Department of Information and Communications Technology company and Malmö stad company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Department of Information and Communications Technology company and Malmö stad company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Department of Information and Communications Technology company and Malmö stad company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Department of Information and Communications Technology company and Malmö stad company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Department of Information and Communications Technology company and Malmö stad company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Department of Information and Communications Technology company and Malmö stad company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Department of Information and Communications Technology company and Malmö stad company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Department of Information and Communications Technology company and Malmö stad company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Department of Information and Communications Technology company and Malmö stad company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Department of Information and Communications Technology company and Malmö stad company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Department of Information and Communications Technology and Malmö stad, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Department of Information and Communications Technology and Malmö stad, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Department of Information and Communications Technology or Malmö stad ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Department of Information and Communications Technology or Malmö stad ?
Between Department of Information and Communications Technology and Malmö stad, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Department of Information and Communications Technology and Malmö stad, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-49416
SUMMARY

The CONS_HISTORY ioctl handler did not adequately validate the requested history size. A large value caused an integer overflow in the buffer size calculation, resulting in a heap allocation smaller than expected. Subsequent initialization of the buffer wrote beyond the end of the allocation. An unprivileged local user with access to a vt(4) device can trigger an out-of-bounds write in the kernel, potentially escalating privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49414
SUMMARY

The ELF image activator cleared per-process ASLR preference flags for setuid binaries after the code that computes the PIE base address, rather than before. As a result, a user-requested ASLR disable was still in effect at the point where the base address was chosen. An unprivileged local user can disable ASLR for a setuid PIE binary by calling procctl(2) before execve(2). This makes exploitation of any separate memory corruption vulnerability in that binary significantly easier.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49417
SUMMARY

Second, the audio buffer backing a mapping could be freed when the device was closed even though the mapping remained valid. The freed memory could then be reused elsewhere while still accessible through the stale mapping. The /dev/dsp device nodes are world-accessible by default. On a system with an audio device, either issue allows an unprivileged local user to read and write kernel memory, which can be used to escalate privileges, potentially gaining full control of the affected system. At a minimum, an attacker can crash the kernel, resulting in a Denial of Service (DoS).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49413
SUMMARY

The Linuxulator determined whether a binary was set-user-ID or set-group-ID by checking the P_SUGID process flag. During execve(2), this flag is not yet set at the point where the auxiliary vector is constructed, so AT_SECURE was incorrectly set to zero for set-user-ID and set-group-ID executables. An unprivileged local user can inject a shared library via LD_PRELOAD into a set-user-ID or set-group-ID Linux binary, gaining the privileges of that binary.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49412
SUMMARY

The kernel handler for IPV6_MSFILTER dropped a serializing lock in order to copy the source-filter list from userspace, then reacquired the lock. During this window another thread could free the multicast filter structure, leaving the handler with a stale pointer to freed memory. An unprivileged local user can exploit this use-after-free to escalate privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA