Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Department of Information and Communications TechnologyDepartment of Information and Communications Technology
VS
Malmö stadMalmö stad
Department of Information and Communications Technology

Department of Information and Communications Technology

Studio 7, 807 Epifanio de los Santos Avenue, Diliman, Quezon City, 1103, PH

Last Update: 04/04/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
https://dict.gov.ph/
704/1000Moderate

The Department of Information and Communications Technology is mandated by Republic Act (RA) 10844 or the DICT Act of 2015 to be the primary policy, planning, coordinating, implementing, and administrative entity of the Executive Branch of the government that will plan,...

NAICS:92
NAICS Definition:Public Administration
Employees:716
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
1
Malmö stad

Malmö stad

August Palms plats 1, Malmö, 205 80, SE

Last Update: 03/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://malmo.se/jobb
779/1000Fair

Bli en samhällsbyggare – jobba i Malmö stad! Genom att arbeta i Malmö stad får du möjlighet att arbeta med hållbar samhällsutveckling. Som en samhällsbyggare spelar du en viktig roll i Malmös utveckling och därför ser vi oss som framtidens arbetsplats. Människors lik...

NAICS:92
NAICS Definition:Public Administration
Employees:14,500
Subsidiaries:5
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Department of Information and Communications Technology

Department of Information and Communications Technology

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Malmö stad

Malmö stad

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Department of Information and Communications Technology in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Malmö stad in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Department of Information and Communications Technology (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Department of Information and Communications Technology cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Malmö stad (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Malmö stad cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Department of Information and Communications Technology

Department of Information and Communications Technology

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
DIC3833538092225
🔒 Incident : Breach
DIC2762527111925
Malmö stad

Malmö stad

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Department of Information and Communications Technology company and Malmö stad company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Department of Information and Communications Technology company and Malmö stad company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Department of Information and Communications Technology company and Malmö stad company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Department of Information and Communications Technology company and Malmö stad company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Department of Information and Communications Technology company and Malmö stad company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Department of Information and Communications Technology company and Malmö stad company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Department of Information and Communications Technology company and Malmö stad company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Department of Information and Communications Technology company and Malmö stad company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Department of Information and Communications Technology company and Malmö stad company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Department of Information and Communications Technology company and Malmö stad company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Department of Information and Communications Technology company and Malmö stad company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Department of Information and Communications Technology and Malmö stad, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Department of Information and Communications Technology and Malmö stad, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Department of Information and Communications Technology or Malmö stad ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Department of Information and Communications Technology or Malmö stad ?
Between Department of Information and Communications Technology and Malmö stad, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Department of Information and Communications Technology and Malmö stad, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-81203
SUMMARY

A vulnerability has been found in SourceCodester Simple Online Food Ordering System 1.0. This affects an unknown function of the file /admin/ajax.php?action=login2. The manipulation of the argument email leads to sql injection. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-26
UPDATED
Date2026-08-26
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-80158
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in the ipa_getkeytab module of the community.general Ansible collection. The module's bind_pw parameter, used to supply the LDAP simple-bind password when retrieving a Kerberos keytab, is not declared with no_log, unlike the sibling password parameter in the same module. As a consequence, the supplied IPA/LDAP bind password is recorded in cleartext in the managed host's system journal/syslog (the module's "Invoked with" record), is included in the module's return values and verbose (-v) output, and is displayed in Automation Controller / AWX job output. The password is additionally passed on the command line to the ipa-getkeytab helper (as --bindpw <value>), exposing it in the process list to local users while the command runs. An attacker able to read these logs, job output, or the process table can obtain the directory bind credential, potentially compromising the accounts and objects that credential can access.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-26
UPDATED
Date2026-08-26
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-75340
SUMMARY

The device metadata import interface /device/instance/{productId}/property-metadata/import of jetlinks community 2.11 is vulnerable to Server-side request forgery (SSRF).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-26
UPDATED
Date2026-08-26
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-75338
SUMMARY

disconf (Distributed Configuration Management Platform) 2.6.36 is vulnerable to Incorrect Access Control. The config-fetching APIs /api/config/item, /api/config/file, /api/config/list and /api/config/simple/list are exposed without authentication. The LoginInterceptor explicitly whitelists these four paths, so any anonymous attacker can read every configuration item and configuration file managed by the config center.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-26
UPDATED
Date2026-08-26
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-75336
SUMMARY

Funiture 1.0.0 is vulnerable to SQL Injection in the backend tool interfaces /sys/tool/select.json and /sys/tool/update.json.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-26
UPDATED
Date2026-08-26
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA