Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Dickey's Barbecue Restaurants, Inc.Dickey's Barbecue Restaurants, Inc.
VS
Taco BellTaco Bell
Dickey's Barbecue Restaurants, Inc.

Dickey's Barbecue Restaurants, Inc.

4514 Cole Avenue, Dallas, 75205, US

Last Update: 03/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.Dickeys.com
756/1000Fair

Dickey's Barbecue Pit, the world’s largest and fastest growing barbecue franchise was founded in 1941 by Travis Dickey. Today, Dickey’s locations across the nation serve guests Legit. Texas. Barbecue.™ The Dallas-based family-run barbecue franchise offers several slow-s...

NAICS:7225
NAICS Definition:Restaurants and Other Eating Places
Employees:1,569
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
Taco Bell

Taco Bell

1 Glen Bell Way, Irvine, CA, US, 92618

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://tacobell.com
747/1000Moderate

Taco Bell was born and raised in California and has been around since 1962. We went from selling everyone’s favorite Crunchy Tacos on the West Coast to a global brand with 8,200+ restaurants, 350 franchise organizations, that serve 42+ million fans each week around the ...

NAICS:7225
NAICS Definition:Restaurants and Other Eating Places
Employees:83,616
Subsidiaries:3
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Dickey's Barbecue Restaurants, Inc.

Dickey's Barbecue Restaurants, Inc.

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Taco Bell

Taco Bell

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Restaurants Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Dickey's Barbecue Restaurants, Inc. in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Restaurants Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Taco Bell in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Dickey's Barbecue Restaurants, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Dickey's Barbecue Restaurants, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Taco Bell (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Taco Bell cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Dickey's Barbecue Restaurants, Inc.

Dickey's Barbecue Restaurants, Inc.

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
DIC426072525
Taco Bell

Taco Bell

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
NORKFCFOHTACHYA1769001351

FAQ

Between Dickey's Barbecue Restaurants, Inc. company and Taco Bell company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Dickey's Barbecue Restaurants, Inc. company and Taco Bell company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Dickey's Barbecue Restaurants, Inc. company and Taco Bell company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Dickey's Barbecue Restaurants, Inc. company and Taco Bell company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Dickey's Barbecue Restaurants, Inc. company and Taco Bell company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Dickey's Barbecue Restaurants, Inc. company and Taco Bell company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Dickey's Barbecue Restaurants, Inc. company and Taco Bell company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Dickey's Barbecue Restaurants, Inc. company and Taco Bell company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Dickey's Barbecue Restaurants, Inc. company and Taco Bell company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Dickey's Barbecue Restaurants, Inc. company and Taco Bell company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Dickey's Barbecue Restaurants, Inc. company and Taco Bell company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Dickey's Barbecue Restaurants, Inc. and Taco Bell, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Dickey's Barbecue Restaurants, Inc. and Taco Bell, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Dickey's Barbecue Restaurants, Inc. or Taco Bell ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Dickey's Barbecue Restaurants, Inc. or Taco Bell ?
Between Dickey's Barbecue Restaurants, Inc. and Taco Bell, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Dickey's Barbecue Restaurants, Inc. and Taco Bell, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-48777
SUMMARY

FileBrowser Quantum is a free, self-hosted, web-based file manager. Versions prior to 1.3.2-stable, 1.4.0-beta and 1.4.1-beta are vulnerable to Path Traversal through the publicPatchHandler in backend/http/public.go which joins user-controlled fromPath and toPath body fields with the trusted d.share.Path BEFORE the downstream sanitizer runs. Because filepath.Join collapses .. segments during the join, the sanitizer in resourcePatchHandler never sees the traversal and the move/copy/rename operates on a path outside the shared directory. The same root-cause pattern was patched for the bulk DELETE endpoint as CVE-2026-44542 (GHSA-fwj3-42wh-8673), but the PATCH handler with the identical pattern was not updated. A public share link with AllowModify=true is sufficient to exploit this. Anyone holding such a link can move, copy, or rename arbitrary files within the share owner's source root. This issue has been fixed in versions 1.3.3-stable and 1.4.2-beta.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-16
UPDATED
Date2026-06-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 9.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-47750
SUMMARY

stable-diffusion.cpp is a pure C/C++ library for running diffusion model (Stable Diffusion, Flux, Wan, Qwen Image, Z-Image, and more) inference. In versions prior to master-584-0a7ae07, the pickle .ckpt parser in src/model.cpp contained a heap buffer overflow vulnerability in the GLOBAL opcode handler. The issue was caused by missing validation when searching for newline-delimited fields. A crafted .ckpt file without the expected newline could cause the parser to use -1 as a copy length, resulting in immediate heap corruption. The attack requires the victim or application to load a .ckpt file from an untrusted source, such as a downloaded model from a model sharing site. The issue has been resolved in version master-584-0a7ae07. If developers are unable to immediately update their applications they can work around this issue by following these instructions: do not load .ckpt checkpoint files from untrusted sources, and prefer trusted model sources and safer formats such as .safetensors where possible.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-16
UPDATED
Date2026-06-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-47747
SUMMARY

stable-diffusion.cpp is a pure C/C++ library for running diffusion model (Stable Diffusion, Flux, Wan, Qwen Image, Z-Image, and more) inference. In versions prior to master-584-0a7ae07, the pickle .ckpt parser in src/model.cpp contained a heap buffer overflow vulnerability in the BINUNICODE opcode handler. The issue was caused by sign confusion on the opcode length field. A crafted .ckpt file could trigger memcpy with a very large length derived from a negative signed value, causing immediate heap corruption. The issue has been resolved in version master-584-0a7ae07. If developers are unable to immediately update their applications they can work around this issue by only loading .ckpt checkpoint files from trusted sources and preferring trusted model sources and safer formats such as .safetensors where possible.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-16
UPDATED
Date2026-06-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-46448
SUMMARY

In OpenStack Nova before 33.0.2, the server create API does not strip certain hint data. The resulting instance has no Placement allocation.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-16
UPDATED
Date2026-06-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-22313
SUMMARY

The device has a webserver that exposes a REST API authenticated with a token on the management network. By exploiting an OS command injection vulnerability an authenticated attacker can send arbitrary commands to the device that are executed with administrative permissions by the underlying operating system.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-16
UPDATED
Date2026-06-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.3