Comparison Overview
DIAN Dirección de Impuestos y Aduanas Nacionales

DIAN Dirección de Impuestos y Aduanas Nacionales
111711, Bogotá D.C., 111711, CO
Last Update: 13/03/2026
Somos una entidad adscrita al Ministerio de Hacienda y Crédito Público, y queremos facilitar y garantizar el entendimiento y cumplimiento de los deberes tributarios, aduaneros y cambiarios, para contribuir a la seguridad fiscal del estado y la competitividad del país. ...

Social Security Administration
6401 Security Blvd, Baltimore, 21235, US
Last Update: 02/04/2026
Social Security provides financial protection for our nation’s people, supporting more than 64 million individuals and families. With retirement, disability, and survivors benefits, Social Security is one of the most successful anti-poverty programs in our nation's his...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

DIAN Dirección de Impuestos y Aduanas Nacionales







Social Security Administration






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)
DIAN Dirección de Impuestos y Aduanas Nacionales has 32.43% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)
Social Security Administration has 0.99% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incident History - DIAN Dirección de Impuestos y Aduanas Nacionales (X = Date, Y = Severity)
DIAN Dirección de Impuestos y Aduanas Nacionales cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Social Security Administration (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Social Security Administration cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

DIAN Dirección de Impuestos y Aduanas Nacionales

Social Security Administration
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
Heym from 0.0.55 before 0.0.121 contains a privilege escalation vulnerability that allows shared collaborators to overwrite a workflow's error_workflow_id because the field is missing from OWNER_ONLY_EXECUTION_FIELDS. Attackers can point the error workflow to their own workflow with an HTTP node, and when the parent workflow errors the owner's decrypted credentials are injected and exfiltrated.
Nodemailer from 3.0.0 before 10.0.10 contains a quadratic complexity denial of service vulnerability in the SMTP client reply parser in SMTPConnection._onData and isPartialResponse. A malicious SMTP server or on-path attacker can stream continuation lines without a completion line before authentication, blocking the Node.js event loop and exhausting memory.
Nodemailer from 3.0.0 before 10.0.10 contains a denial of service vulnerability in MessageParser.parseHeaders that allows users to exhaust CPU through quadratic header unfolding. Attackers can supply large recipient lists or long headers that fold into tens of thousands of continuation lines, blocking the Node.js event loop during DKIM signing.
Nodemailer from 3.0.0 before 10.0.13 contains an improper input validation vulnerability in its address parser that fails to strip RFC 5322 comments inside angle-bracket addresses. Attackers can supply recipients like a display name with a parenthesized comment in the domain, so illegal characters reach envelope.to and RCPT TO, causing rejected delivery or parser interpretation conflicts that bypass domain allow-lists.
Nodemailer 3.0.0 before 10.0.13 has a regular expression denial of service in SMTPConnection._actionEHLO, whose four AUTH mechanism detection regexes contain overlapping whitespace sub-patterns that backtrack quadratically. A malicious or man-in-the-middle SMTP server can reply to EHLO with 250-AUTH, a long whitespace run and a non-matching token, blocking the Node.js event loop for tens of seconds to hours before authentication.