Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

DIALOGDIALOG
VS
DarDar
DIALOG

DIALOG

134 11 Avenue SE, Calgary, T2G 0X5, CA

Last Update: 16/06/2026

View Profile
Between 650 and 699
http://www.dialogdesign.ca
693/1000Weak

Hello. Glad you stopped by. In fact, we were hoping you’d stop by because we’re unabashedly passionate about design and love to connect with those who feel the same. We’re a team of architects, urban planners, interior designers, structural, mechanical and electrical e...

NAICS:5414
NAICS Definition:Specialized Design Services
Employees:1,198
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
Dar

Dar

Beirut, LB

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://dar.com/
790/1000Fair

Dar is one of the world’s leading consultancies, providing design, planning, engineering, sustainability consulting, digital solutions and services, project management, and facilities management for buildings, cities, transportation, civil infrastructure, water, and the...

NAICS:5414
NAICS Definition:Specialized Design Services
Employees:12,502
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
DIALOG

DIALOG

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Dar

Dar

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Design Services Industry Avg (This Year)

DIALOG has 58.33% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs Design Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Dar in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - DIALOG (X = Date, Y = Severity)

DIALOG cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Dar (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Dar cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
DIALOG

DIALOG

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
DIA1781641587
Dar

Dar

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between DIALOG company and Dar company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between DIALOG company and Dar company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between DIALOG company and Dar company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between DIALOG company and Dar company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between DIALOG company and Dar company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between DIALOG company and Dar company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between DIALOG company and Dar company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between DIALOG company and Dar company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between DIALOG company and Dar company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between DIALOG company and Dar company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between DIALOG company and Dar company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between DIALOG and Dar, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between DIALOG and Dar, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - DIALOG or Dar ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - DIALOG or Dar ?
Between DIALOG and Dar, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between DIALOG and Dar, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-93892
SUMMARY

IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to exposure of session tokens in the HTML response.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-93891
SUMMARY

IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to an XML external entity (XXE) injection flaw.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
4.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.3
CVE-2026-92832
SUMMARY

IBM Aspera Enterprise WebApps 1.0.0 through 1.0.6 could allow a local attacker to obtain sensitive information due to cleartext transmission of sensitive information.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
2.5
CVE-2026-85457
SUMMARY

IBM Planning Analytics 2.0, and 2.1 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a stack-based buffer overflow.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-84418
SUMMARY

IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 can allow a man-in-the-middle attacker to present a forged TLS certificate, intercept the connection, and capture the IAM bearer Authorization header automatically attached by the session adapter. The captured token grants full platform-scope tenant API access, enabling the attacker to read and manipulate the victim's DataStage projects, flows, assets, and pipeline definitions. This is client-side SDK code running on the user's own machine, so exploitation requires an external network interceptor rather than a co-tenant in the shared cluster.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2