Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

DHL Express LatviaDHL Express Latvia
VS
MSC Mediterranean Shipping CompanyMSC Mediterranean Shipping Company
DHL Express Latvia

DHL Express Latvia

Mazā Gramzdas iela 9A, Lidosta “Rīga”,, Marupe, Mārupe 1053, LV

Last Update: 22/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://dhlexpresslatvia.lv
751/1000Fair

DHL Group is the world’s leading logistic company. The Group connects people and markets and is an enabler of global trade. It aspires to be the first choice for customers, employees and investors worldwide. To this end, DHL Group is focusing on growth in its profitable...

NAICS:47
NAICS Definition:Transportation and Warehousing
Employees:0
Subsidiaries:56
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
MSC Mediterranean Shipping Company

MSC Mediterranean Shipping Company

12-14 Chemin Rieu, Geneva, 1208, CH

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.msc.com
782/1000Fair

MSC is a privately owned global shipping company founded in 1970 by Gianluigi Aponte. As one of the world’s leading container shipping lines with headquarters in Geneva, Switzerland, MSC operates in over 675 offices across more than 155 countries worldwide with over 200...

NAICS:47
NAICS Definition:Transportation and Warehousing
Employees:35,066
Subsidiaries:3
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
DHL Express Latvia

DHL Express Latvia

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
MSC Mediterranean Shipping Company

MSC Mediterranean Shipping Company

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Transportation, Logistics, Supply Chain and Storage Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for DHL Express Latvia in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Transportation, Logistics, Supply Chain and Storage Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for MSC Mediterranean Shipping Company in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - DHL Express Latvia (X = Date, Y = Severity)

DHL Express Latvia cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - MSC Mediterranean Shipping Company (X = Date, Y = Severity)

MSC Mediterranean Shipping Company cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
DHL Express Latvia

DHL Express Latvia

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
MSC Mediterranean Shipping Company

MSC Mediterranean Shipping Company

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
GNVMSC1765979891
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
MSC1772094527
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
MSC327092125

FAQ

Between DHL Express Latvia company and MSC Mediterranean Shipping Company company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between DHL Express Latvia company and MSC Mediterranean Shipping Company company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between DHL Express Latvia company and MSC Mediterranean Shipping Company company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between DHL Express Latvia company and MSC Mediterranean Shipping Company company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between DHL Express Latvia company and MSC Mediterranean Shipping Company company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between DHL Express Latvia company and MSC Mediterranean Shipping Company company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between DHL Express Latvia company and MSC Mediterranean Shipping Company company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between DHL Express Latvia company and MSC Mediterranean Shipping Company company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between DHL Express Latvia company and MSC Mediterranean Shipping Company company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between DHL Express Latvia company and MSC Mediterranean Shipping Company company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between DHL Express Latvia company and MSC Mediterranean Shipping Company company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between DHL Express Latvia and MSC Mediterranean Shipping Company, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between DHL Express Latvia and MSC Mediterranean Shipping Company, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - DHL Express Latvia or MSC Mediterranean Shipping Company ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - DHL Express Latvia or MSC Mediterranean Shipping Company ?
Between DHL Express Latvia and MSC Mediterranean Shipping Company, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between DHL Express Latvia and MSC Mediterranean Shipping Company, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1