Comparison Overview
DHL Group Investor Relations

DHL Group Investor Relations
Charles-de-Gaulle-Str. 20, Bonn, 53113, DE
Last Update: 23/12/2025
We are DHL Group’s Investor Relations specialists. We have a broad and exciting area of responsibility that takes in the entire spectrum of IR communications required by DHL Group, both as a listed company and as a leader in sustainable logistics. Investor Relations fun...

Lineage
46500 Humboldt Dr., Novi, MI, US, 48377
Last Update: 02/04/2026
Lineage is one of the world’s leading temperature-controlled industrial REITs and integrated solutions providers with a global network of over 480 strategically located facilities, totaling nearly 2.9 billion cubic feet of capacity across countries in North America, Eur...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

DHL Group Investor Relations







Lineage






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Transportation, Logistics, Supply Chain and Storage Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for DHL Group Investor Relations in 2026.
Incidents vs Transportation, Logistics, Supply Chain and Storage Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Lineage in 2026.
Incident History - DHL Group Investor Relations (X = Date, Y = Severity)
DHL Group Investor Relations cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Lineage (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Lineage cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

DHL Group Investor Relations

Lineage
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
OpenStack Ironic through 38.0.0 may send a username and password to an unexpected remote host when Image Service is configured for HTTP(S) Basic Authentication.
An issue was discovered in OpenStack Keystone before 29.0.3. Tokens obtained via delegated authentication methods (EC2 credentials, application credentials, OAuth1 access tokens, and trusts) are not blocked from creating, modifying, or deleting credentials via the /v3/credentials API. EC2-derived tokens can additionally read credential blobs, exposing TOTP MFA seeds and other secrets. Also, PATCH /v3/credentials does not validate the requested post-update project_id, allowing any delegated token to move a credential to an unauthorized project. All Keystone deployments using delegated authentication are affected.
The administrative password is hashed using a comparatively weak, fast algorithm for the credential store backing one authentication path, and the file containing that hash is written with permissions allowing it to be read by any local user. This is inconsistent with a separate, stronger hashing algorithm used for the same password on another authentication path. A party able to read this file, including a local user or a party with access to a configuration backup, could feasibly recover the underlying password through offline computation, compromising the administrative credential across every path that accepts it.
An example environment-configuration file for a bundled inventory-management component ships with a fixed, publicly-known administrative password. A deployment that copies this example file into active configuration without running the setup routine that regenerates credentials will expose that component's administrative interface to anyone aware of the default value.
A prior update that raised a bundled HTTP client library to a version remediating known vulnerabilities was later reverted, reintroducing the earlier, vulnerable version into a log-processing component. The only code path in that component using the library issues a request to a single fixed, trusted vendor URL at initialization and does not process attacker-controlled input through the library, limiting practical exploitability of the reintroduced version in this context.