Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

DHL Global ForwardingDHL Global Forwarding
VS
Transnet SOC LtdTransnet SOC Ltd
DHL Global Forwarding

DHL Global Forwarding

Deutsche Post AG, Headquarters, Bonn, 53250, DE

Last Update: 28/03/2026

View Profile

The Freight Forwarding experts since 1815. Our passion is to enable international trade. We simplify our customer operations and maximize their opportunities. Let's stay connected. DHL Global Forwarding is part of Deutsche Post DHL Group with more than 31,000 freight...

NAICS:47
NAICS Definition:Transportation and Warehousing
Employees:29,395
Subsidiaries:27
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Transnet SOC Ltd

Transnet SOC Ltd

138 Eloff Street, Johannesburg, Gauteng, ZA, 2001

Last Update: 03/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.transnet.net
776/1000Fair

As the custodian of ports, rail and pipelines, Transnet’s objective is to ensure a globally competitive freight system that enables sustained growth and diversification of the country’s economy. As a state-owned company, Transnet continues to leave an indelible mark ...

NAICS:47
NAICS Definition:Transportation and Warehousing
Employees:27,301
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
DHL Global Forwarding

DHL Global Forwarding

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Transnet SOC Ltd

Transnet SOC Ltd

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Transportation, Logistics, Supply Chain and Storage Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for DHL Global Forwarding in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Transportation, Logistics, Supply Chain and Storage Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Transnet SOC Ltd in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - DHL Global Forwarding (X = Date, Y = Severity)

DHL Global Forwarding cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Transnet SOC Ltd (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Transnet SOC Ltd cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
DHL Global Forwarding

DHL Global Forwarding

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Transnet SOC Ltd

Transnet SOC Ltd

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
TRA603092125

FAQ

Between DHL Global Forwarding company and Transnet SOC Ltd company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between DHL Global Forwarding company and Transnet SOC Ltd company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between DHL Global Forwarding company and Transnet SOC Ltd company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between DHL Global Forwarding company and Transnet SOC Ltd company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between DHL Global Forwarding company and Transnet SOC Ltd company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between DHL Global Forwarding company and Transnet SOC Ltd company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between DHL Global Forwarding company and Transnet SOC Ltd company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between DHL Global Forwarding company and Transnet SOC Ltd company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between DHL Global Forwarding company and Transnet SOC Ltd company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between DHL Global Forwarding company and Transnet SOC Ltd company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between DHL Global Forwarding company and Transnet SOC Ltd company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between DHL Global Forwarding and Transnet SOC Ltd, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between DHL Global Forwarding and Transnet SOC Ltd, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - DHL Global Forwarding or Transnet SOC Ltd ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - DHL Global Forwarding or Transnet SOC Ltd ?
Between DHL Global Forwarding and Transnet SOC Ltd, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between DHL Global Forwarding and Transnet SOC Ltd, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1