Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

DHL Express TaiwanDHL Express Taiwan
VS
Rhenus LogisticsRhenus Logistics
DHL Express Taiwan

DHL Express Taiwan

No. 120, Sec. 2, Jianguo N. Rd., Taipei, Taiwan 10483, TW

Last Update: 20/04/2026

View Profile
752/1000Fair

【DHL – 全世界頂尖的物流公司】 DHL成立於1969年,隸屬於全球最大的郵遞和物流集團-德國郵政DHL (Deutsche Post DHL),是全球第一家提供國際快遞服務的供應商,更是全球國際快遞業的領導品牌。我們的業務遍佈全球,於全世界220多個國家和地區,提供可靠的緊急文件和貨品戶對戶快遞服務。 1973年DHL在台成立分支機構-DHL Express Taiwan洋基通運股份有限公司,為第一家進入台灣市場的國際快遞業者,並以多年的優質服務品質,成為市場佔有率最高的國際快遞公司。目前全台共有15個服務據點,超過1000名專...

NAICS:47
NAICS Definition:Transportation and Warehousing
Employees:0
Subsidiaries:64
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Rhenus Logistics

Rhenus Logistics

Rhenus-Platz 1, Holzwickede, D-59439, DE

Last Update: 13/09/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.rhenus.group
721/1000Moderate

The Rhenus Group is one of the leading logistics specialists with global business operations and annual turnover amounting to EUR 8.2 billion. 41,000 employees work at 1,330 business sites in more than 70+ countries and develop innovative solutions along the complete su...

NAICS:47
NAICS Definition:Transportation and Warehousing
Employees:14,822
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
DHL Express Taiwan

DHL Express Taiwan

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Rhenus Logistics

Rhenus Logistics

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Transportation, Logistics, Supply Chain and Storage Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for DHL Express Taiwan in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Transportation, Logistics, Supply Chain and Storage Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Rhenus Logistics in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - DHL Express Taiwan (X = Date, Y = Severity)

DHL Express Taiwan cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Rhenus Logistics (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Rhenus Logistics cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
DHL Express Taiwan

DHL Express Taiwan

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Rhenus Logistics

Rhenus Logistics

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
RHE517092125
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
RHE949092225

FAQ

Between DHL Express Taiwan company and Rhenus Logistics company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between DHL Express Taiwan company and Rhenus Logistics company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between DHL Express Taiwan company and Rhenus Logistics company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between DHL Express Taiwan company and Rhenus Logistics company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between DHL Express Taiwan company and Rhenus Logistics company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between DHL Express Taiwan company and Rhenus Logistics company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between DHL Express Taiwan company and Rhenus Logistics company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between DHL Express Taiwan company and Rhenus Logistics company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between DHL Express Taiwan company and Rhenus Logistics company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between DHL Express Taiwan company and Rhenus Logistics company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between DHL Express Taiwan company and Rhenus Logistics company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between DHL Express Taiwan and Rhenus Logistics, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between DHL Express Taiwan and Rhenus Logistics, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - DHL Express Taiwan or Rhenus Logistics ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - DHL Express Taiwan or Rhenus Logistics ?
Between DHL Express Taiwan and Rhenus Logistics, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between DHL Express Taiwan and Rhenus Logistics, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-111865
SUMMARY

A security flaw has been discovered in THU-MIG yoloe up to 40cd606cabdbe2b566d6f14a6b162c89206e9a1b. This affects the function eval of the file ultralytics/nn/autobackend.py of the component AutoBackend Model Loading. The manipulation of the argument imgsz/names/kpt_shape results in improper neutralization of directives in dynamically evaluated code. The attack requires a local approach. The exploit has been released to the public and may be used for attacks. This product does not use versioning. This is why information about affected and unaffected releases are unavailable. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-17
UPDATED
Date2026-10-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
AV:L/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 1.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-111934
SUMMARY

Coder before 2.34.7 contains an IP spoofing vulnerability in the ExtractRealIPAddress middleware that trusts the leftmost, client-supplied X-Forwarded-For value instead of the client IP appended by a reverse proxy. Attackers can send forged X-Forwarded-For values through appending proxies to bypass per-IP rate limits on login, one-time passcode, and password validation endpoints, enabling brute-force attacks, and to falsify IP addresses recorded in audit logs.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-17
UPDATED
Date2026-10-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.7
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-111933
SUMMARY

Coder before 2.29.17, 2.30.0 before 2.32.7, 2.33.0 before 2.33.8, and 2.34.0 before 2.34.2 contains a user enumeration vulnerability because userpassword.Compare() substitutes a placeholder hash derived from the string "hunter2" when a stored password hash is empty. Unauthenticated attackers can submit logins with the password "hunter2" and distinguish HTTP 403 from 401 responses to enumerate valid accounts and reveal the authentication provider of SSO-only users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-17
UPDATED
Date2026-10-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.7
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-111932
SUMMARY

Coder before 2.29.17, 2.30.0 before 2.32.7, 2.33.0 before 2.33.8, and 2.34.0 before 2.34.2 contains a stored HTML injection vulnerability because the ApplicationName and LogoURL appearance settings are rendered into HTML output without sufficient escaping. Attackers with the Owner role can store HTML markup in these settings that renders in the Coder dashboard and in SMTP notification emails sent to other deployment users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-17
UPDATED
Date2026-10-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:R/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 4.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
1.7
CVE-2026-111931
SUMMARY

Coder from 2.0.0 before 2.34.8 contains an open redirect vulnerability in handleAPIKeySmuggling that allows attackers to redirect users externally via unsanitized r.URL.Path values. Attackers can craft links on trusted workspace app subdomains with paths beginning with double slashes, which become scheme-relative redirects to attacker sites for phishing.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-17
UPDATED
Date2026-10-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8