Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

DHL Express PakistanDHL Express Pakistan
VS
DHLDHL
DHL Express Pakistan

DHL Express Pakistan

Survey #137 Jinnah International Airport، Airport Road, Faisal Cantonment, Karachi, Pakistan, Karachi, 75100, PK

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://mydhl.express.dhl/pk
752/1000Fair

Established in Pakistan in 1982, DHL Express is part of the world’s leading international logistics company, DHL Group. With more than 600 employees, a strong retail footprint of 91 outlets and operations in 25 cities across the country, DHL Express Pakistan provides ti...

NAICS:47
NAICS Definition:Transportation and Warehousing
Employees:257
Subsidiaries:56
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
DHL

DHL

Charles-de-Gaulle-Str. 20, Bonn, DE, 53113

Last Update: 18/06/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.dhl.com
794/1000Fair

DHL is the leading global brand in the logistics industry. Our divisions offer an unrivaled portfolio of logistics services ranging from national and international parcel delivery, e-commerce shipping and fulfillment solutions, international express, road, air and ocean...

NAICS:47
NAICS Definition:Transportation and Warehousing
Employees:224,682
Subsidiaries:68
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
2

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
DHL Express Pakistan

DHL Express Pakistan

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
DHL

DHL

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Transportation, Logistics, Supply Chain and Storage Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for DHL Express Pakistan in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Transportation, Logistics, Supply Chain and Storage Industry Avg (This Year)

DHL has 5.66% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - DHL Express Pakistan (X = Date, Y = Severity)

DHL Express Pakistan cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - DHL (X = Date, Y = Severity)

DHL cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
DHL Express Pakistan

DHL Express Pakistan

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
DHL

DHL

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
DHL1777415025
🔒 Incident : Breach
SAMFOXORAFORDHL1781785487

FAQ

Between DHL Express Pakistan company and DHL company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between DHL Express Pakistan company and DHL company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between DHL Express Pakistan company and DHL company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between DHL Express Pakistan company and DHL company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between DHL Express Pakistan company and DHL company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between DHL Express Pakistan company and DHL company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between DHL Express Pakistan company and DHL company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between DHL Express Pakistan company and DHL company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between DHL Express Pakistan company and DHL company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between DHL Express Pakistan company and DHL company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between DHL Express Pakistan company and DHL company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between DHL Express Pakistan and DHL, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between DHL Express Pakistan and DHL, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - DHL Express Pakistan or DHL ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - DHL Express Pakistan or DHL ?
Between DHL Express Pakistan and DHL, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between DHL Express Pakistan and DHL, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-49416
SUMMARY

The CONS_HISTORY ioctl handler did not adequately validate the requested history size. A large value caused an integer overflow in the buffer size calculation, resulting in a heap allocation smaller than expected. Subsequent initialization of the buffer wrote beyond the end of the allocation. An unprivileged local user with access to a vt(4) device can trigger an out-of-bounds write in the kernel, potentially escalating privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49414
SUMMARY

The ELF image activator cleared per-process ASLR preference flags for setuid binaries after the code that computes the PIE base address, rather than before. As a result, a user-requested ASLR disable was still in effect at the point where the base address was chosen. An unprivileged local user can disable ASLR for a setuid PIE binary by calling procctl(2) before execve(2). This makes exploitation of any separate memory corruption vulnerability in that binary significantly easier.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49417
SUMMARY

Second, the audio buffer backing a mapping could be freed when the device was closed even though the mapping remained valid. The freed memory could then be reused elsewhere while still accessible through the stale mapping. The /dev/dsp device nodes are world-accessible by default. On a system with an audio device, either issue allows an unprivileged local user to read and write kernel memory, which can be used to escalate privileges, potentially gaining full control of the affected system. At a minimum, an attacker can crash the kernel, resulting in a Denial of Service (DoS).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49413
SUMMARY

The Linuxulator determined whether a binary was set-user-ID or set-group-ID by checking the P_SUGID process flag. During execve(2), this flag is not yet set at the point where the auxiliary vector is constructed, so AT_SECURE was incorrectly set to zero for set-user-ID and set-group-ID executables. An unprivileged local user can inject a shared library via LD_PRELOAD into a set-user-ID or set-group-ID Linux binary, gaining the privileges of that binary.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49412
SUMMARY

The kernel handler for IPV6_MSFILTER dropped a serializing lock in order to copy the source-filter list from userspace, then reacquired the lock. During this window another thread could free the multicast filter structure, leaving the handler with a stale pointer to freed memory. An unprivileged local user can exploit this use-after-free to escalate privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA