Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

DHL Express Middle East and North AfricaDHL Express Middle East and North Africa
VS
DSV - Global Transport and LogisticsDSV - Global Transport and Logistics
DHL Express Middle East and North Africa

DHL Express Middle East and North Africa

DHL Regional Distribution Center, Muharraq, Bahrain Road 2406, BH

Last Update: 19/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.dhl.com
752/1000Fair

DHL Express is the world's leading international courier company. Door to door shipping services anywhere in the world. Operating in 220 countries and territories, with over 200,000 employees globally and over 5,000 employees in the Middle East and North Africa region. ...

NAICS:47
NAICS Definition:Transportation and Warehousing
Employees:0
Subsidiaries:56
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
DSV - Global Transport and Logistics

DSV - Global Transport and Logistics

Hovedgaden 630, Hedehusene, DK, 2640

Last Update: 04/04/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
https://www.dsv.com
812/1000Good

At DSV, we keep supply chains flowing in a world of change. We provide and manage supply chain solutions for thousands of companies every day – from small family-run businesses to large global corporations. Our reach is global, yet our presence is local and close to our...

NAICS:47
NAICS Definition:Transportation and Warehousing
Employees:52,926
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
DHL Express Middle East and North Africa

DHL Express Middle East and North Africa

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
DSV - Global Transport and Logistics

DSV - Global Transport and Logistics

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Transportation, Logistics, Supply Chain and Storage Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for DHL Express Middle East and North Africa in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Transportation, Logistics, Supply Chain and Storage Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for DSV - Global Transport and Logistics in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - DHL Express Middle East and North Africa (X = Date, Y = Severity)

DHL Express Middle East and North Africa cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - DSV - Global Transport and Logistics (X = Date, Y = Severity)

DSV - Global Transport and Logistics cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
DHL Express Middle East and North Africa

DHL Express Middle East and North Africa

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
DSV - Global Transport and Logistics

DSV - Global Transport and Logistics

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between DHL Express Middle East and North Africa company and DSV - Global Transport and Logistics company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between DHL Express Middle East and North Africa company and DSV - Global Transport and Logistics company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between DHL Express Middle East and North Africa company and DSV - Global Transport and Logistics company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between DHL Express Middle East and North Africa company and DSV - Global Transport and Logistics company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between DHL Express Middle East and North Africa company and DSV - Global Transport and Logistics company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between DHL Express Middle East and North Africa company and DSV - Global Transport and Logistics company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between DHL Express Middle East and North Africa company and DSV - Global Transport and Logistics company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between DHL Express Middle East and North Africa company and DSV - Global Transport and Logistics company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between DHL Express Middle East and North Africa company and DSV - Global Transport and Logistics company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between DHL Express Middle East and North Africa company and DSV - Global Transport and Logistics company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between DHL Express Middle East and North Africa company and DSV - Global Transport and Logistics company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between DHL Express Middle East and North Africa and DSV - Global Transport and Logistics, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between DHL Express Middle East and North Africa and DSV - Global Transport and Logistics, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - DHL Express Middle East and North Africa or DSV - Global Transport and Logistics ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - DHL Express Middle East and North Africa or DSV - Global Transport and Logistics ?
Between DHL Express Middle East and North Africa and DSV - Global Transport and Logistics, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between DHL Express Middle East and North Africa and DSV - Global Transport and Logistics, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-19374
SUMMARY

A security vulnerability has been detected in adafap api-mcp up to 92b9a5d04acfec165c7d4ef852496593aa87be06. This affects the function customAxios of the file app/api/proxy/route.ts of the component Proxy API Endpoint. The manipulation of the argument url leads to server-side request forgery. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. This product adopts a rolling release strategy to maintain continuous delivery. Therefore, version details for affected or updated releases cannot be specified. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-09
UPDATED
Date2026-08-09
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-19373
SUMMARY

A weakness has been identified in PhialsBasement KoboldCPP-MCP-Server 1.0.0. Affected by this issue is the function makeRequest of the file src/index.ts of the component BaseConfigSchema. Executing a manipulation of the argument apiUrl can lead to server-side request forgery. It is possible to launch the attack on the local host. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-09
UPDATED
Date2026-08-09
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
AV:L/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 1.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-19372
SUMMARY

A security flaw has been discovered in Handwriting-OCR handwriting-ocr-mcp-server 0.1.0. Affected by this vulnerability is the function fs.readFileSync of the file src/index.ts of the component upload_document. Performing a manipulation of the argument File results in path traversal. Attacking locally is a requirement. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-09
UPDATED
Date2026-08-09
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
AV:L/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 1.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-19371
SUMMARY

A vulnerability was identified in Nikolaibibo claude-comfyui-mcp 1.0.0. Affected is the function copyFileSync of the file src/tools/utils.ts of the component comfy_upload_image. Such manipulation of the argument image_path leads to path traversal. An attack has to be approached locally. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-09
UPDATED
Date2026-08-09
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
AV:L/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 1.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-12372
SUMMARY

A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in nltk/nltk versions 3.9.4 and the current develop branch. The `nltk.pathsec.validate_network_url()` function, intended to prevent SSRF by rejecting internal network addresses, fails to reject IPs in the RFC 6598 shared address space (`100.64.0.0/10`). This occurs because Python's `ipaddress` module does not classify such addresses as `is_private` or `is_global`, and the current guard only checks `is_private` and a few explicit categories. An attacker who can influence a URL passed to NLTK's network-loading helpers can exploit this vulnerability to make a strict-mode application send requests to shared-address-space hosts, potentially exposing non-public infrastructure reachable from the application host. The impact is limited to SSRF-style confidentiality exposure, with no code execution claimed.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-09
UPDATED
Date2026-08-09
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.7
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2