Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

DHL Freight Enterprise Software SolutionsDHL Freight Enterprise Software Solutions
VS
AlmavivA ExperienceAlmavivA Experience
DHL Freight Enterprise Software Solutions

DHL Freight Enterprise Software Solutions

Iskarsko shousse 7, building 15, Sofia, Sofia, 1000, BG

Last Update: 30/12/2025

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.dhl-ess.com/
750/1000Fair

You know that DHL is one of the largest companies in the world. But do you know that one of its critical development centers with the global significance is in Sofia, Bulgaria? And that the Bulgarian office manages our two other locations – Prague and Cologne? Over t...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:47
Subsidiaries:13
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
AlmavivA Experience

AlmavivA Experience

Avenida Rebouças 2728, São Paulo, 05402-500, BR

Last Update: 03/04/2026

View Profile
778/1000Fair

Líder em transformação digital nos mercados de Customer Experience e Debt Collection na América Latina. Combinamos tecnologia, inteligência e excelência operacional para entregar soluções completas que antecipam as necessidades dos nossos Clientes. São mais de 530 mil...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:22,366
Subsidiaries:14
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
DHL Freight Enterprise Software Solutions

DHL Freight Enterprise Software Solutions

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
AlmavivA Experience

AlmavivA Experience

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for DHL Freight Enterprise Software Solutions in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for AlmavivA Experience in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - DHL Freight Enterprise Software Solutions (X = Date, Y = Severity)

DHL Freight Enterprise Software Solutions cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - AlmavivA Experience (X = Date, Y = Severity)

AlmavivA Experience cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
DHL Freight Enterprise Software Solutions

DHL Freight Enterprise Software Solutions

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
AlmavivA Experience

AlmavivA Experience

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between DHL Freight Enterprise Software Solutions company and AlmavivA Experience company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between DHL Freight Enterprise Software Solutions company and AlmavivA Experience company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between DHL Freight Enterprise Software Solutions company and AlmavivA Experience company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between DHL Freight Enterprise Software Solutions company and AlmavivA Experience company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between DHL Freight Enterprise Software Solutions company and AlmavivA Experience company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between DHL Freight Enterprise Software Solutions company and AlmavivA Experience company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between DHL Freight Enterprise Software Solutions company and AlmavivA Experience company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between DHL Freight Enterprise Software Solutions company and AlmavivA Experience company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between DHL Freight Enterprise Software Solutions company and AlmavivA Experience company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between DHL Freight Enterprise Software Solutions company and AlmavivA Experience company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between DHL Freight Enterprise Software Solutions company and AlmavivA Experience company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between DHL Freight Enterprise Software Solutions and AlmavivA Experience, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between DHL Freight Enterprise Software Solutions and AlmavivA Experience, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - DHL Freight Enterprise Software Solutions or AlmavivA Experience ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - DHL Freight Enterprise Software Solutions or AlmavivA Experience ?
Between DHL Freight Enterprise Software Solutions and AlmavivA Experience, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between DHL Freight Enterprise Software Solutions and AlmavivA Experience, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1