Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

DHL Air (UK) LtdDHL Air (UK) Ltd
VS
Delta Air LinesDelta Air Lines
DHL Air (UK) Ltd

DHL Air (UK) Ltd

EMA Cargo West, East Midlands Airport, Derby, DE742TR, GB

Last Update: 20/04/2026

View Profile
754/1000Fair

DHL Air UK Ltd is the largest all-cargo air carrier in the UK, operating a fleet of B757, B767 and B777 aircraft supporting worldwide air-freight operations for DHL Express. As an 100% wholly-owned DHL airline, we work with international specialists all around the globe...

NAICS:481
NAICS Definition:Air Transportation
Employees:0
Subsidiaries:56
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Delta Air Lines

Delta Air Lines

1030 Delta Boulevard, Atlanta, 30320-6001, US

Last Update: 26/09/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.delta.com
732/1000Moderate

Delta Air Lines (NYSE: DAL) is the U.S. global airline leader in safety, innovation, reliability and customer experience. Powered by our employees around the world, Delta has for a decade led the airline industry in operational excellence while maintaining our reputatio...

NAICS:481
NAICS Definition:Air Transportation
Employees:76,940
Subsidiaries:6
12-month incidents
2
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
2

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
DHL Air (UK) Ltd

DHL Air (UK) Ltd

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Delta Air Lines

Delta Air Lines

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Airlines and Aviation Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for DHL Air (UK) Ltd in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Airlines and Aviation Industry Avg (This Year)

Delta Air Lines has 98.02% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - DHL Air (UK) Ltd (X = Date, Y = Severity)

DHL Air (UK) Ltd cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Delta Air Lines (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Delta Air Lines cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
DHL Air (UK) Ltd

DHL Air (UK) Ltd

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Delta Air Lines

Delta Air Lines

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
DEL1777437123
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
PEPDELADOFIFTHEADINETOPE1783376814
🔒 Incident : Breach
DEL335072525

FAQ

Between DHL Air (UK) Ltd company and Delta Air Lines company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between DHL Air (UK) Ltd company and Delta Air Lines company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between DHL Air (UK) Ltd company and Delta Air Lines company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between DHL Air (UK) Ltd company and Delta Air Lines company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between DHL Air (UK) Ltd company and Delta Air Lines company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between DHL Air (UK) Ltd company and Delta Air Lines company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between DHL Air (UK) Ltd company and Delta Air Lines company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between DHL Air (UK) Ltd company and Delta Air Lines company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between DHL Air (UK) Ltd company and Delta Air Lines company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between DHL Air (UK) Ltd company and Delta Air Lines company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between DHL Air (UK) Ltd company and Delta Air Lines company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between DHL Air (UK) Ltd and Delta Air Lines, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between DHL Air (UK) Ltd and Delta Air Lines, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - DHL Air (UK) Ltd or Delta Air Lines ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - DHL Air (UK) Ltd or Delta Air Lines ?
Between DHL Air (UK) Ltd and Delta Air Lines, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between DHL Air (UK) Ltd and Delta Air Lines, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-105761
SUMMARY

Dify is an open-source LLM app development platform. Prior to 1.16.0, the PUT /console/api/apps/<app_id>/server endpoint in api/controllers/console/app/mcp_server.py used AppMCPServerController.put() to retrieve an AppMCPServer by the client-supplied server ID without verifying that the server belonged to the requested application and tenant. An authenticated workspace member could therefore change another application's MCP server status and parameters, potentially redirecting data or disabling the service. This issue is fixed in version 1.16.0.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-05
UPDATED
Date2026-10-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
4.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-105760
SUMMARY

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models. Prior to 0.30.0, a caller can use the request-level media_io_kwargs field to select the GLMGA video backend and supply large values for the fps and max_frames options without a strict work ceiling. GLMGA constructs and deduplicates an attacker-sized pre-decode frame-index list, allowing a compact request and tiny valid video to consume disproportionate CPU time and memory in the shared media-loading executor. This issue is fixed in version 0.30.0.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-05
UPDATED
Date2026-10-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-105759
SUMMARY

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models. Prior to 0.30.0, the Rust frontend's track_http_metrics middleware records the raw HTTP method token as a Prometheus label for requests reaching registered routes. An unauthenticated attacker can send unique arbitrary method tokens to unguarded routes such as /tokenize, causing Prometheus's Family::get_or_create function to permanently create counter and histogram label sets. Those label sets increase process memory usage and enlarge the /metrics response until the service or monitoring path is exhausted. This issue is fixed in version 0.30.0.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-05
UPDATED
Date2026-10-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-105758
SUMMARY

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models. From 0.24.0 until 0.30.0, the Qwen2VLVideoBackend and Qwen3VLVideoBackend classes accept request-level values for the media_io_kwargs.video.max_frames and media_io_kwargs.video.fps fields without enforcing server-side ceilings. An unauthenticated caller can submit these values to the /tokenize endpoint, causing the sampler to decode every frame selected from attacker-controlled video input, consume disproportionate frontend memory, and potentially terminate the API process before scheduling or admission control. The Rust frontend is not affected because it rejects the media_io_kwargs field. This issue is fixed in version 0.30.0.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-05
UPDATED
Date2026-10-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-105757
SUMMARY

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models. Prior to 0.30.0, structured-output request failures can escape request-scoped validation and reach the EngineCore fatal-error path. A per-request backend mismatch can re-raise a grammar compilation exception, padding produced by the ngram_gpu speculative-decoding mode can pass a negative token to guidance validation, and the Rust frontend can admit empty structured-output values that the Python frontend rejects, allowing ordinary constrained-generation requests to terminate the shared engine. This issue is fixed in version 0.30.0.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-05
UPDATED
Date2026-10-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8