Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

DHL Air (Austria) GmbHDHL Air (Austria) GmbH
VS
Menzies AviationMenzies Aviation
DHL Air (Austria) GmbH

DHL Air (Austria) GmbH

Office Park 4, Flughafen-Wien, 1300, AT

Last Update: 20/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.dhl.com
752/1000Fair

Founded in 2021, DHL Air Austria is a 100% subsidiary of DHL Group and part of the division DHL Express. Together with European Air Transport (EAT), DHL Air Austria covers most of the European DHL network with a fleet of 19 Boeing 757 and 4 Boeing 767. Want to join us ...

NAICS:481
NAICS Definition:Air Transportation
Employees:181
Subsidiaries:56
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Menzies Aviation

Menzies Aviation

21-22 Bloomsbury Square, London, England, GB

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
772/1000Fair

People. Passion. Pride. These have driven our team since 1833. Since that time, we have developed to become a critical partner in the global aviation industry, delivering time-critical logistics services at over 350 locations in 65 countries, across six continents...

NAICS:481
NAICS Definition:Air Transportation
Employees:17,681
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
DHL Air (Austria) GmbH

DHL Air (Austria) GmbH

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Menzies Aviation

Menzies Aviation

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Airlines and Aviation Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for DHL Air (Austria) GmbH in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Airlines and Aviation Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Menzies Aviation in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - DHL Air (Austria) GmbH (X = Date, Y = Severity)

DHL Air (Austria) GmbH cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Menzies Aviation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Menzies Aviation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
DHL Air (Austria) GmbH

DHL Air (Austria) GmbH

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Menzies Aviation

Menzies Aviation

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
MEN934072625

FAQ

Between DHL Air (Austria) GmbH company and Menzies Aviation company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between DHL Air (Austria) GmbH company and Menzies Aviation company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between DHL Air (Austria) GmbH company and Menzies Aviation company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between DHL Air (Austria) GmbH company and Menzies Aviation company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between DHL Air (Austria) GmbH company and Menzies Aviation company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between DHL Air (Austria) GmbH company and Menzies Aviation company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between DHL Air (Austria) GmbH company and Menzies Aviation company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between DHL Air (Austria) GmbH company and Menzies Aviation company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between DHL Air (Austria) GmbH company and Menzies Aviation company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between DHL Air (Austria) GmbH company and Menzies Aviation company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between DHL Air (Austria) GmbH company and Menzies Aviation company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between DHL Air (Austria) GmbH and Menzies Aviation, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between DHL Air (Austria) GmbH and Menzies Aviation, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - DHL Air (Austria) GmbH or Menzies Aviation ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - DHL Air (Austria) GmbH or Menzies Aviation ?
Between DHL Air (Austria) GmbH and Menzies Aviation, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between DHL Air (Austria) GmbH and Menzies Aviation, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-59723
SUMMARY

Cline is an autonomous coding agent as an SDK, IDE extension, or CLI assistant. Prior to 3.0.30, the Cline Hub dashboard server launched by the cline dashboard command accepts WebSocket connections on the /browser endpoint without validating the Origin header, and when ROOM_SECRET is unset for local 127.0.0.1 binds, isAuthorizedBrowserRequest() allows attacker-controlled websites to send desktopCommand frames that read workspace state, mutate MCP and provider settings, and trigger command execution when a provider or model is configured. This issue is fixed in version 3.0.30.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-54784
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. In version 1.9.0, CoreWCF SPNEGO SecurityContextToken negotiation can expose the proof key recovered from the RSTR when TransportWithMessageCredential with Windows client credentials and session establishment are used, allowing an observer to impersonate the authenticated Windows principal and decrypt or forge WS-SecureConversation traffic. This issue is fixed in version 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54783
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF WS-Security endorsing and supporting signature verification does not ensure the selected ds:Signature covers the expected Security header target, allowing an attacker with one captured signed SOAP envelope to replay arbitrary service operations as the victim principal. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54782
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML 1.1 and SAML 2.0 token validation does not correctly resolve the issuer signing key or require signed tokens when IdentityConfiguration is used with federated bindings, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to impersonate any principal the trusted STS could issue. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-54781
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML token validation does not enforce SubjectConfirmation method URIs or holder-of-key proof keys in SamlSecurityTokenHandler, allowing holder-of-key downgrade or custom confirmation method assertions to authenticate a subject without proving authority over the assertion. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2