Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

DFS Deutsche Flugsicherung GmbHDFS Deutsche Flugsicherung GmbH
VS
Alaska AirlinesAlaska Airlines
DFS Deutsche Flugsicherung GmbH

DFS Deutsche Flugsicherung GmbH

Am DFS-Campus 10, Langen, 63225, DE

Last Update: 09/03/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.dfs.de
834/1000Good

DFS Deutsche Flugsicherung GmbH, the German air navigation service provider, is a State-owned company under private law with 5,800 employees. DFS ensures the safe and punctual flow of air traffic over Germany. Around 2,200 air traffic controllers guide more than three m...

NAICS:481
NAICS Definition:Air Transportation
Employees:1,696
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
Alaska Airlines

Alaska Airlines

19300 International Blvd, Seattle, 98188, US

Last Update: 31/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://alaskaair.jobs
766/1000Fair

We’re creating an airline people love. It begins with each Alaska Airlines employee, bringing unique strengths and energy to our work in the air and on the ground. Every day, we go beyond what’s expected and reach for the remarkable, together. Welcome to our LinkedIn ...

NAICS:481
NAICS Definition:Air Transportation
Employees:13,117
Subsidiaries:2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
DFS Deutsche Flugsicherung GmbH

DFS Deutsche Flugsicherung GmbH

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Alaska Airlines

Alaska Airlines

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Airlines and Aviation Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for DFS Deutsche Flugsicherung GmbH in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Airlines and Aviation Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Alaska Airlines in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - DFS Deutsche Flugsicherung GmbH (X = Date, Y = Severity)

DFS Deutsche Flugsicherung GmbH cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Alaska Airlines (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Alaska Airlines cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
DFS Deutsche Flugsicherung GmbH

DFS Deutsche Flugsicherung GmbH

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
DFS1769024348
Alaska Airlines

Alaska Airlines

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between DFS Deutsche Flugsicherung GmbH company and Alaska Airlines company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between DFS Deutsche Flugsicherung GmbH company and Alaska Airlines company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between DFS Deutsche Flugsicherung GmbH company and Alaska Airlines company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between DFS Deutsche Flugsicherung GmbH company and Alaska Airlines company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between DFS Deutsche Flugsicherung GmbH company and Alaska Airlines company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between DFS Deutsche Flugsicherung GmbH company and Alaska Airlines company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between DFS Deutsche Flugsicherung GmbH company and Alaska Airlines company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between DFS Deutsche Flugsicherung GmbH company and Alaska Airlines company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between DFS Deutsche Flugsicherung GmbH company and Alaska Airlines company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between DFS Deutsche Flugsicherung GmbH company and Alaska Airlines company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between DFS Deutsche Flugsicherung GmbH company and Alaska Airlines company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between DFS Deutsche Flugsicherung GmbH and Alaska Airlines, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between DFS Deutsche Flugsicherung GmbH and Alaska Airlines, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - DFS Deutsche Flugsicherung GmbH or Alaska Airlines ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - DFS Deutsche Flugsicherung GmbH or Alaska Airlines ?
Between DFS Deutsche Flugsicherung GmbH and Alaska Airlines, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between DFS Deutsche Flugsicherung GmbH and Alaska Airlines, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-57980
SUMMARY

Authentication bypass using an alternate path or channel in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to perform tampering over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-56741
SUMMARY

JLine is a Java library for handling console input. Prior to 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1, the JLine3 Telnet server remote-telnet module does not apply an upper bound to terminal dimensions received via the Telnet NAWS option, and TelnetIO.handleNAWS() in TelnetIO.java:856-879 reads client-supplied width and height as 16-bit unsigned integers and passes values such as 65535x65535 to setTerminalGeometry(), allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to repeatedly alternate values and trigger continuous expensive rendering work that causes CPU exhaustion and denial of service. This issue is fixed in versions 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-56740
SUMMARY

JLine is a Java library for handling console input. Prior to 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1, the JLine3 Telnet server remote-telnet module does not limit the number of environment variables a client may inject via the Telnet NEW-ENVIRON option, and TelnetIO.readNEVariables() in TelnetIO.java:1127-1180 stores each variable pair in a HashMap held by ConnectionData, allowing an unauthenticated attacker to flood unique variable pairs before the terminating IAC SE byte and exhaust JVM heap memory with an OutOfMemoryError. This issue is fixed in versions 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-56171
SUMMARY

Exposure of private personal information to an unauthorized actor in Windows RDP allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-54335
SUMMARY

Feathersjs is a framework for creating web APIs and real-time applications with TypeScript or JavaScript. In 5.0.44 and earlier, the _.merge(target, source) utility exported by @feathersjs/commons recursively merges source into target by iterating Object.keys(source). When source was produced by JSON.parse and contains a __proto__, constructor, or prototype key, that key is returned as an own-enumerable property; the recursive merge then resolves target['__proto__'] to Object.prototype and writes attacker-supplied properties onto it, polluting the prototype for all plain objects in the process for the lifetime of the Node process. This issue is fixed in version 5.0.45.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.7
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2