Comparison Overview
DFS Aviation Services GmbH

DFS Aviation Services GmbH
Heinrich-Hertz-Straße 26, Langen (Hessen), 63225, DE
Last Update: 02/04/2026
DFS Aviation Services is a subsidiary of DFS Deutsche Flugsicherung, the German air navigation service provider (ANSP). DFS is responsible for one of the most complex airspaces in the world and handles around 3 million flights annually. The core business of DFS Aviation...

Air India SATS Airport Services Private Limited (AISATS)
Air India SATS Airport Services Private Limited, 16th floor, Oberoi Commerz II, International Business Park, Mumbai, 400063, IN
Last Update: 01/04/2026
Welcome to AISATS! As India's leading gateway services company headquartered in Mumbai and operating in Delhi, Bengaluru, Hyderabad, Thiruvananthapuram, Mangaluru and Ranchi airports, we at AISATS, care for our client airlines and their passengers. Our customers know...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

DFS Aviation Services GmbH







Air India SATS Airport Services Private Limited (AISATS)






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Airlines and Aviation Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for DFS Aviation Services GmbH in 2026.
Incidents vs Airlines and Aviation Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Air India SATS Airport Services Private Limited (AISATS) in 2026.
Incident History - DFS Aviation Services GmbH (X = Date, Y = Severity)
DFS Aviation Services GmbH cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Air India SATS Airport Services Private Limited (AISATS) (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Air India SATS Airport Services Private Limited (AISATS) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

DFS Aviation Services GmbH

Air India SATS Airport Services Private Limited (AISATS)
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
phpMyFAQ before 4.1.5 contains a privilege escalation vulnerability in GroupController::updatePermissions that allows GROUP_EDIT administrators to grant arbitrary rights to groups without verifying they hold those rights themselves. A delegated administrator can exploit this by assigning high-value permissions to a group they belong to, inheriting those rights and escalating privileges up to full administrative control.
n8n before 2.25.7 and 2.26.x before 2.26.2 contains an abstract syntax tree (AST) security validator bypass in the Python Code node. An authenticated user with permission to create or modify workflows containing a Python Code node can bypass the validator and access the task executor module namespace. The issue only affects self-hosted instances where the Python Task Runner is enabled; where N8N_BLOCK_RUNNER_ENV_ACCESS is configured to allow it, this can disclose environment variables accessible to the task runner process.
Grav CMS before 2.0.0-beta.2 contains multiple code-execution vulnerabilities. Three unsafe unserialize() calls - in Scheduler\JobQueue, Framework\Cache\Adapter\FileCache, and Session - deserialize untrusted data without restricting allowed classes, enabling PHP object injection and, via a gadget chain, arbitrary code execution where an attacker controls the serialized input. Additionally, InstallCommand's git clone operation passes the branch, url, and path parameters into a shell command without escaping, allowing OS command injection via plugin/theme installation (which requires admin access). A Twig security blocklist bypass (server-side template injection) is also present. The issues are fixed in 2.0.0-beta.2.
Storage Concentrator (SC & SCVM) contains a command injection vulnerability within the debug.pl script that is reachable without authentication. A remote attacker can submit a specially crafted HTTP request containing a malicious payload that is processed without adequate input sanitization, resulting in arbitrary command execution with root-level privileges on the underlying system.
Storage Concentrator (SC & SCVM) contains a command injection vulnerability in the ms_service.pl service, which listens on TCP port 9000 by default and accepts custom network packets to perform device actions. An unauthenticated remote attacker can send a specially crafted packet containing a malicious payload that is processed without adequate sanitization, resulting in arbitrary command execution with root-level privileges.