Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

DFAT South Australia State OfficeDFAT South Australia State Office
VS
RijkswaterstaatRijkswaterstaat
DFAT South Australia State Office

DFAT South Australia State Office

N/A

Last Update: 13/11/2025

View Profile

DFAT’s South Australia State Office helps advance the department’s economic security and business engagement agenda, including a focus on Australia’s economic prosperity, supply chain resilience and trade expansion programs. We make sure that the Australian Government i...

NAICS:92
NAICS Definition:Public Administration
Employees:0
Subsidiaries:20
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Rijkswaterstaat

Rijkswaterstaat

Koningskade 4, Den Haag, 2500 EX, NL

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
783/1000Fair

Rijkswaterstaat is de uitvoeringsorganisatie van het Ministerie van Infrastructuur en Waterstaat. We beheren en ontwikkelen de rijkswegen, -vaarwegen en –wateren en zetten in op een duurzame leefomgeving. Samen met andere organisaties werken we aan een land dat bescher...

NAICS:92
NAICS Definition:Public Administration
Employees:12,096
Subsidiaries:2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
DFAT South Australia State Office

DFAT South Australia State Office

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Rijkswaterstaat

Rijkswaterstaat

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for DFAT South Australia State Office in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Rijkswaterstaat in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - DFAT South Australia State Office (X = Date, Y = Severity)

DFAT South Australia State Office cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Rijkswaterstaat (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Rijkswaterstaat cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
DFAT South Australia State Office

DFAT South Australia State Office

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Rijkswaterstaat

Rijkswaterstaat

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between DFAT South Australia State Office company and Rijkswaterstaat company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between DFAT South Australia State Office company and Rijkswaterstaat company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between DFAT South Australia State Office company and Rijkswaterstaat company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between DFAT South Australia State Office company and Rijkswaterstaat company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between DFAT South Australia State Office company and Rijkswaterstaat company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between DFAT South Australia State Office company and Rijkswaterstaat company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between DFAT South Australia State Office company and Rijkswaterstaat company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between DFAT South Australia State Office company and Rijkswaterstaat company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between DFAT South Australia State Office company and Rijkswaterstaat company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between DFAT South Australia State Office company and Rijkswaterstaat company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between DFAT South Australia State Office company and Rijkswaterstaat company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between DFAT South Australia State Office and Rijkswaterstaat, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between DFAT South Australia State Office and Rijkswaterstaat, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - DFAT South Australia State Office or Rijkswaterstaat ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - DFAT South Australia State Office or Rijkswaterstaat ?
Between DFAT South Australia State Office and Rijkswaterstaat, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between DFAT South Australia State Office and Rijkswaterstaat, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-97032
SUMMARY

HTTP/2 servers could end up crashing due to inadvertently modifying its HPACK encoder concurrently. This happens because the server modifies the HPACK encoder from two goroutines without synchronization: one uses the encoder to encode a HEADERS frame as part of a response sent to a client and the other modifies the encoder's table size when handling a SETTINGS frame containing SETTINGS_HEADER_TABLE_SIZE that a client sends. A malicious client can repeatedly send a request while changing the header table size to crash the server.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-97031
SUMMARY

Multiple ECH outer extension references are not permitted under RFC 9849; previously, a client could send a well-crafted packet that could trigger memory exhaustion in the server process by specifying multiple references. We now reject these as malformed and curb the memory amplification vector as a result.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-97030
SUMMARY

A trusted template author may have previously written a valid template wherein the use of the 'yield' keyword would not be correctly escaped. We now ensure that valid keyword uses are escaped and non-keyword uses are not escaped.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-96207
SUMMARY

Improper certificate validation in Microsoft Partner Center allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-94510
SUMMARY

Authorization bypass through user-controlled key in Microsoft Bookings allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:H/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
5.3
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9