Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Dexterra GroupDexterra Group
VS
Verzani & SandriniVerzani & Sandrini
Dexterra Group

Dexterra Group

5925 Airport Rd, Mississauga, Ontario, L4V 1W1, CA

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://dexterra.com/
766/1000Fair

Dexterra Group is a publicly listed corporation (TSX:DXT) delivering a range of support services for the creation, management, and operation of infrastructure across Canada. Powered by people, we bring best-in-class regional expertise to every challenge and deliver in...

NAICS:561
NAICS Definition:N/A
Employees:2,452
Subsidiaries:7
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Verzani & Sandrini

Verzani & Sandrini

Rua Marina, 487, São Paulo, São Paulo, 09070-510, BR

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.verzani.com.br/
784/1000Fair

Com uma história sólida de sucesso desde sua fundação em 1967, a Verzani & Sandrini se destaca como líder nacional em diversos serviços terceirizados. Presente em todo o Brasil com mais de 71 mil colaboradores, atendemos setores como shopping centers, indústrias, hospi...

NAICS:5612
NAICS Definition:Facilities Support Services
Employees:15,564
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Dexterra Group

Dexterra Group

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Verzani & Sandrini

Verzani & Sandrini

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Facilities Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Dexterra Group in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Facilities Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Verzani & Sandrini in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Dexterra Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Dexterra Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Verzani & Sandrini (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Verzani & Sandrini cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Dexterra Group

Dexterra Group

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Verzani & Sandrini

Verzani & Sandrini

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Dexterra Group company and Verzani & Sandrini company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Dexterra Group company and Verzani & Sandrini company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Dexterra Group company and Verzani & Sandrini company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Dexterra Group company and Verzani & Sandrini company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Dexterra Group company and Verzani & Sandrini company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Dexterra Group company and Verzani & Sandrini company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Dexterra Group company and Verzani & Sandrini company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Dexterra Group company and Verzani & Sandrini company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Dexterra Group company and Verzani & Sandrini company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Dexterra Group company and Verzani & Sandrini company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Dexterra Group company and Verzani & Sandrini company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Dexterra Group and Verzani & Sandrini, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Dexterra Group and Verzani & Sandrini, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Dexterra Group or Verzani & Sandrini ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Dexterra Group or Verzani & Sandrini ?
Between Dexterra Group and Verzani & Sandrini, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Dexterra Group and Verzani & Sandrini, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-63261
SUMMARY

Uncontrolled Resource Consumption (CWE-400) in Kibana can lead to denial of service via Excessive Allocation (CAPEC-130). A low-privileged authenticated user can send a specially crafted request to a Kibana machine learning feature, causing the server to exhaust available memory and become unavailable to all users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63260
SUMMARY

Uncontrolled Resource Consumption (CWE-400) in Kibana can lead to denial of service via Excessive Allocation (CAPEC-130). An authenticated attacker with low-privilege access can trigger a denial of service condition in Kibana by sending a specially crafted, oversized request payload. Processing this user-supplied input requires resource-intensive memory allocation that can exhaust the available heap memory in the Kibana process, causing it to crash and become unavailable to all users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63259
SUMMARY

Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key (CWE-639) in Kibana can lead to information disclosure via user-supplied identifiers that reference scheduled query result data from Kibana Spaces the requester is not authorized to access.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63145
SUMMARY

Incorrect Authorization (CWE-863) in Kibana can lead to integrity compromise of Machine Learning audit and notification records via Accessing Functionality Not Properly Constrained by ACLs (CAPEC-1). A vulnerability exists in Kibana's Machine Learning functionality where a Machine Learning management endpoint performs an insufficient authorization check. The endpoint validates only a coarse privilege level but does not verify that the requesting user has access to the specific Machine Learning job or notification resources provided in the request. As a result, a low-privileged user with Machine Learning access in any Kibana space can manipulate Machine Learning audit and notification records for arbitrary jobs—including jobs in other spaces or belonging to other users—by leveraging Kibana's internally elevated credentials to write to restricted Machine Learning system indices that the user cannot access directly.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63144
SUMMARY

Uncontrolled Recursion (CWE-674) in Elasticsearch can lead to denial of service via a specially crafted search request submitted by a low-privileged authenticated user. A user with read-level index access can submit a request that triggers unbounded recursive processing within the Elasticsearch query evaluation component, causing a fatal error that terminates the affected node. In single-node deployments, this results in complete service outage; in multi-node clusters, it causes repeated node restarts and sustained availability degradation.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8