Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

デクスコムジャパン 合同会社 (Dexcom Japan)デクスコムジャパン 合同会社 (Dexcom Japan)
VS
StrykerStryker
デクスコムジャパン 合同会社 (Dexcom Japan)

デクスコムジャパン 合同会社 (Dexcom Japan)

目黒区下目黒1丁目8番1号目黒アルコタワー7階, 東京都, JP

Last Update: 19/12/2025

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.dexcom.com/ja-JP
757/1000Fair

デクスコムジャパンは、「健やかな生活をご自身の力で手に入れる」というミッションを基に、持続血糖モニター(CGM: Continuous Glucose Monitoring)を通じて、人々が健やかな生活を送るために事業を推進しています。| DexCom, Inc. | NASDAQ: DXCM | CGM | DexCom Japan

NAICS:3391
NAICS Definition:Medical Equipment and Supplies Manufacturing
Employees:14
Subsidiaries:5
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Stryker

Stryker

2825 Airview Boulevard, Kalamazoo, 49002, US

Last Update: 11/09/2026

View Profile
Between 0 and 549
http://www.stryker.com
494/1000Critical

Stryker is a global leader in medical technologies and, together with our customers, we are driven to make healthcare better. We offer innovative products and services in MedSurg, Neurotechnology and Orthopaedics that help improve patient and healthcare outcomes. Alongs...

NAICS:3391
NAICS Definition:Medical Equipment and Supplies Manufacturing
Employees:51,473
Subsidiaries:26
12-month incidents
17
Known data breaches
4
Attack type number
2

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
デクスコムジャパン 合同会社 (Dexcom Japan)

デクスコムジャパン 合同会社 (Dexcom Japan)

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Stryker

Stryker

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Medical Equipment Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for デクスコムジャパン 合同会社 (Dexcom Japan) in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Medical Equipment Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

Stryker has 1550.49% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - デクスコムジャパン 合同会社 (Dexcom Japan) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

デクスコムジャパン 合同会社 (Dexcom Japan) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Stryker (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Stryker cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
デクスコムジャパン 合同会社 (Dexcom Japan)

デクスコムジャパン 合同会社 (Dexcom Japan)

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Stryker

Stryker

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
STR1787430281
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
STR1783982145
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
STR1779337852

FAQ

Between デクスコムジャパン 合同会社 (Dexcom Japan) company and Stryker company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between デクスコムジャパン 合同会社 (Dexcom Japan) company and Stryker company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between デクスコムジャパン 合同会社 (Dexcom Japan) company and Stryker company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between デクスコムジャパン 合同会社 (Dexcom Japan) company and Stryker company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between デクスコムジャパン 合同会社 (Dexcom Japan) company and Stryker company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between デクスコムジャパン 合同会社 (Dexcom Japan) company and Stryker company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between デクスコムジャパン 合同会社 (Dexcom Japan) company and Stryker company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between デクスコムジャパン 合同会社 (Dexcom Japan) company and Stryker company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between デクスコムジャパン 合同会社 (Dexcom Japan) company and Stryker company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between デクスコムジャパン 合同会社 (Dexcom Japan) company and Stryker company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between デクスコムジャパン 合同会社 (Dexcom Japan) company and Stryker company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between デクスコムジャパン 合同会社 (Dexcom Japan) and Stryker, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between デクスコムジャパン 合同会社 (Dexcom Japan) and Stryker, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - デクスコムジャパン 合同会社 (Dexcom Japan) or Stryker ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - デクスコムジャパン 合同会社 (Dexcom Japan) or Stryker ?
Between デクスコムジャパン 合同会社 (Dexcom Japan) and Stryker, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between デクスコムジャパン 合同会社 (Dexcom Japan) and Stryker, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-91201
SUMMARY

DocsGPT through 0.20.0 posts OAuth connector session tokens to a wildcard target origin in the callback-status endpoint without validating sender origin. Attackers can obtain session tokens and provider account emails by acting as window.opener during OAuth authorization, then use tokens to disconnect victims' cloud storage connectors.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-14
UPDATED
Date2026-09-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:L/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-91200
SUMMARY

DevSpace through 6.3.21 fails to reject parent-directory segments in tar entry names from the in-pod sync stream. Attackers operating a malicious container can stream tar entries with traversal sequences to write arbitrary files on the developer workstation, enabling code execution.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-14
UPDATED
Date2026-09-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-91199
SUMMARY

Refly through 1.1.0 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability in the POST /v1/misc/scrape endpoint that fetches caller-supplied URLs without validating the scheme, host, or resolved address. Authenticated attackers can make the backend issue requests to loopback, private, and link-local addresses including cloud metadata services to read page titles and descriptions of internal resources.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-14
UPDATED
Date2026-09-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.1
CVE-2026-91198
SUMMARY

GrowthBook through 5.0.1 returns unredacted fact table definitions including raw warehouse SQL in payloads served by unauthenticated public report and experiment endpoints. Attackers with knowledge of a publicly shared report or experiment identifier can read internal data warehouse query text, schema, table names, filter values and datasource identifiers.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-14
UPDATED
Date2026-09-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-91197
SUMMARY

Flowable flowable-engine through 8.0.0 contains an XML external entity injection vulnerability in ProcessDiagramLayoutFactory.parseXml() that fails to disable external entity resolution when parsing deployed BPMN resources. Attackers with process deployment privileges can embed DOCTYPE declarations with external entities in BPMN files to read arbitrary local files or trigger requests to internal network endpoints when diagram layout is computed.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-14
UPDATED
Date2026-09-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8