Comparison Overview
Devoteam Data Driven

Devoteam Data Driven
73, Rue Anatole France, Levallois-Perret, FR
Last Update: 23/12/2025
Devoteam Data Driven is the cross-functional team that understands and focuses on the importance of data in the business world and helps organisations turn data insights into business impact. With our +900 specialists located across EMEA, we leverage both our technical ...

Computacenter
Hatfield Avenue, Hatfield, AL10 9TW, GB
Last Update: 13/09/2026
Computacenter is a leading independent technology and services provider, trusted by large corporate and public sector organisations. We are a responsible business that believes in winning together for our people and our planet. We help our customers to Source, Tran...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Devoteam Data Driven







Computacenter






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Information Technology & Services Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Devoteam Data Driven in 2026.
Incidents vs Information Technology & Services Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Computacenter in 2026.
Incident History - Devoteam Data Driven (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Devoteam Data Driven cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Computacenter (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Computacenter cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Devoteam Data Driven

Computacenter
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
Heym from 0.0.55 before 0.0.121 contains a privilege escalation vulnerability that allows shared collaborators to overwrite a workflow's error_workflow_id because the field is missing from OWNER_ONLY_EXECUTION_FIELDS. Attackers can point the error workflow to their own workflow with an HTTP node, and when the parent workflow errors the owner's decrypted credentials are injected and exfiltrated.
Nodemailer from 3.0.0 before 10.0.10 contains a quadratic complexity denial of service vulnerability in the SMTP client reply parser in SMTPConnection._onData and isPartialResponse. A malicious SMTP server or on-path attacker can stream continuation lines without a completion line before authentication, blocking the Node.js event loop and exhausting memory.
Nodemailer from 3.0.0 before 10.0.10 contains a denial of service vulnerability in MessageParser.parseHeaders that allows users to exhaust CPU through quadratic header unfolding. Attackers can supply large recipient lists or long headers that fold into tens of thousands of continuation lines, blocking the Node.js event loop during DKIM signing.
Nodemailer from 3.0.0 before 10.0.13 contains an improper input validation vulnerability in its address parser that fails to strip RFC 5322 comments inside angle-bracket addresses. Attackers can supply recipients like a display name with a parenthesized comment in the domain, so illegal characters reach envelope.to and RCPT TO, causing rejected delivery or parser interpretation conflicts that bypass domain allow-lists.
Nodemailer 3.0.0 before 10.0.13 has a regular expression denial of service in SMTPConnection._actionEHLO, whose four AUTH mechanism detection regexes contain overlapping whitespace sub-patterns that backtrack quadratically. A malicious or man-in-the-middle SMTP server can reply to EHLO with 250-AUTH, a long whitespace run and a non-matching token, blocking the Node.js event loop for tens of seconds to hours before authentication.