Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Deutsche Telekom - Digital, Experience & DeliveryDeutsche Telekom - Digital, Experience & Delivery
VS
TelenorTelenor
Deutsche Telekom - Digital, Experience & Delivery

Deutsche Telekom - Digital, Experience & Delivery

Friedrich-Ebert Allee 140, Bonn, North Rhine-Westphalia, 53113, DE

Last Update: 03/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.telekom.com/en
750/1000Fair

Digital, Product and Engineering for Deutsche Telekom Europe

NAICS:517
NAICS Definition:Telecommunications
Employees:5
Subsidiaries:64
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Telenor

Telenor

Snarøyveien 30, Fornebu, NO, 1331

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.telenor.com/
798/1000Fair

EMPOWERING SOCIETIES. CONNECTING YOU TO WHAT MATTERS MOST. Telenor Group is a leading telecommunications company across the Nordics and Asia with 158 million subscribers and annual sales of around NOK 99 billions (2022).  We are committed to responsible business condu...

NAICS:517
NAICS Definition:Telecommunications
Employees:22,731
Subsidiaries:17
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Deutsche Telekom - Digital, Experience & Delivery

Deutsche Telekom - Digital, Experience & Delivery

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Telenor

Telenor

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Deutsche Telekom - Digital, Experience & Delivery in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Telenor in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Deutsche Telekom - Digital, Experience & Delivery (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Deutsche Telekom - Digital, Experience & Delivery cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Telenor (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Telenor cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Deutsche Telekom - Digital, Experience & Delivery

Deutsche Telekom - Digital, Experience & Delivery

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Telenor

Telenor

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Deutsche Telekom - Digital, Experience & Delivery company and Telenor company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Deutsche Telekom - Digital, Experience & Delivery company and Telenor company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Deutsche Telekom - Digital, Experience & Delivery company and Telenor company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Deutsche Telekom - Digital, Experience & Delivery company and Telenor company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Deutsche Telekom - Digital, Experience & Delivery company and Telenor company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Deutsche Telekom - Digital, Experience & Delivery company and Telenor company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Deutsche Telekom - Digital, Experience & Delivery company and Telenor company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Deutsche Telekom - Digital, Experience & Delivery company and Telenor company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Deutsche Telekom - Digital, Experience & Delivery company and Telenor company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Deutsche Telekom - Digital, Experience & Delivery company and Telenor company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Deutsche Telekom - Digital, Experience & Delivery company and Telenor company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Deutsche Telekom - Digital, Experience & Delivery and Telenor, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Deutsche Telekom - Digital, Experience & Delivery and Telenor, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Deutsche Telekom - Digital, Experience & Delivery or Telenor ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Deutsche Telekom - Digital, Experience & Delivery or Telenor ?
Between Deutsche Telekom - Digital, Experience & Delivery and Telenor, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Deutsche Telekom - Digital, Experience & Delivery and Telenor, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1