Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Deutsche Leasing GruppeDeutsche Leasing Gruppe
VS
LPL FinancialLPL Financial
Deutsche Leasing Gruppe

Deutsche Leasing Gruppe

Frolingstrasse 15, Bad Homburg vor der Hohe, 61352, DE

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
752/1000Fair

Wir sind Ihr Asset-Finance-Partner Als führendes herstellerunabhängiges Leasing-Unternehmen in Deutschland sind wir mehr als nur ein kompetenter Partner in Sachen Leasing. Mit unserer Kombination unterschiedlichster Kompetenzen – von Investitionslösungen über technisch...

NAICS:52
NAICS Definition:Finance and Insurance
Employees:1,341
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
LPL Financial

LPL Financial

4707 Executive Drive, San Diego, 92121-1968, US

Last Update: 13/09/2026

View Profile
Between 600 and 649
https://www.lpl.com/
645/1000Poor

LPL Financial Holdings Inc. (Nasdaq: LPLA) is among the fastest growing wealth management firms in the U.S. As a leader in the financial advisor-mediated marketplace, LPL supports over 29,000 financial advisors and the wealth management practices of approximately 1,10...

NAICS:52
NAICS Definition:Finance and Insurance
Employees:14,964
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
7
Attack type number
2

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Deutsche Leasing Gruppe

Deutsche Leasing Gruppe

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
LPL Financial

LPL Financial

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Deutsche Leasing Gruppe in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)

LPL Financial has 0.99% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - Deutsche Leasing Gruppe (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Deutsche Leasing Gruppe cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - LPL Financial (X = Date, Y = Severity)

LPL Financial cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Deutsche Leasing Gruppe

Deutsche Leasing Gruppe

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
DEU34510723
LPL Financial

LPL Financial

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
ASHLPL1768395244
🔒 Incident : Breach
LPLMAR1780432565
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
AMEHIGLPLEDE1777062318

FAQ

Between Deutsche Leasing Gruppe company and LPL Financial company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Deutsche Leasing Gruppe company and LPL Financial company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Deutsche Leasing Gruppe company and LPL Financial company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Deutsche Leasing Gruppe company and LPL Financial company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Deutsche Leasing Gruppe company and LPL Financial company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Deutsche Leasing Gruppe company and LPL Financial company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Deutsche Leasing Gruppe company and LPL Financial company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Deutsche Leasing Gruppe company and LPL Financial company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Deutsche Leasing Gruppe company and LPL Financial company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Deutsche Leasing Gruppe company and LPL Financial company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Deutsche Leasing Gruppe company and LPL Financial company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Deutsche Leasing Gruppe and LPL Financial, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Deutsche Leasing Gruppe and LPL Financial, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Deutsche Leasing Gruppe or LPL Financial ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Deutsche Leasing Gruppe or LPL Financial ?
Between Deutsche Leasing Gruppe and LPL Financial, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Deutsche Leasing Gruppe and LPL Financial, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-97032
SUMMARY

HTTP/2 servers could end up crashing due to inadvertently modifying its HPACK encoder concurrently. This happens because the server modifies the HPACK encoder from two goroutines without synchronization: one uses the encoder to encode a HEADERS frame as part of a response sent to a client and the other modifies the encoder's table size when handling a SETTINGS frame containing SETTINGS_HEADER_TABLE_SIZE that a client sends. A malicious client can repeatedly send a request while changing the header table size to crash the server.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-97031
SUMMARY

Multiple ECH outer extension references are not permitted under RFC 9849; previously, a client could send a well-crafted packet that could trigger memory exhaustion in the server process by specifying multiple references. We now reject these as malformed and curb the memory amplification vector as a result.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-97030
SUMMARY

A trusted template author may have previously written a valid template wherein the use of the 'yield' keyword would not be correctly escaped. We now ensure that valid keyword uses are escaped and non-keyword uses are not escaped.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-96207
SUMMARY

Improper certificate validation in Microsoft Partner Center allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-94510
SUMMARY

Authorization bypass through user-controlled key in Microsoft Bookings allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:H/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
5.3
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9