Comparison Overview
Deutsche Bank

Deutsche Bank
Taunusanlage 12, Frankfurt am Main, 60325, DE
Last Update: 02/04/2026
Deutsche Bank is the leading German bank with strong European roots and a global network. The bank focuses on its strengths in a Corporate Bank newly created in 2019, a leading Private Bank, a focused investment bank and in asset management. We provide financial servic...

Gesa Credit Union
51 Gage Blvd, Richland, 99352, US
Last Update: 05/04/2026
Gesa Credit Union stands as one of the largest member-owned credit unions in the Pacific Northwest, proudly serving more than 300,000 members across Washington, Oregon, and Idaho with over $6.4 billion in assets. Headquartered in Richland, WA, Gesa delivers a comprehens...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Deutsche Bank







Gesa Credit Union






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Deutsche Bank in 2026.
Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Gesa Credit Union in 2026.
Incident History - Deutsche Bank (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Deutsche Bank cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Gesa Credit Union (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Gesa Credit Union cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Deutsche Bank

Gesa Credit Union
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains a path traversal vulnerability in MultiAgentMonitor that fails to sanitize agent IDs when building file paths. Attackers can include traversal sequences like ../ in agent IDs to read, write, or overwrite arbitrary files, enabling sensitive disclosure, denial of service, or code execution.
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains an information disclosure vulnerability in the MultiAgentLedger component that allows attackers to access sensitive data by registering agents with duplicate IDs. Attackers can exploit the lack of agent ID uniqueness enforcement to share ledger instances and expose system prompts and conversation history between agents.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 contains a cross-origin agent execution vulnerability in the AGUI endpoint that allows remote attackers to trigger arbitrary agent execution. The POST /agui endpoint lacks authentication and hardcodes Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * headers, combined with Starlette's Content-Type-agnostic JSON parsing, enabling attackers to bypass CORS preflight checks via simple requests and exfiltrate sensitive agent responses including tool execution results and environment data.
PraisonAI before 4.5.128 contains an arbitrary shell command execution vulnerability where the UI modules hardcode approval_mode to auto, overriding administrator configuration from PRAISON_APPROVAL_MODE environment variable. Authenticated attackers can instruct the LLM agent to execute arbitrary shell commands via subprocess.run with shell=True, bypassing the manual approval gate and insufficient command sanitization blocklists.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 caches tool approval decisions by tool name only, not by invocation arguments, allowing subsequent execute_command calls to bypass approval prompts. Attackers can exploit this by obtaining initial approval for a benign command, then silently exfiltrate API keys and credentials via subsequent shell commands without user consent.