Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

DeTeAssekuranz Vermittlungsgesellschaft mbHDeTeAssekuranz Vermittlungsgesellschaft mbH
VS
Marsh McLennan AgencyMarsh McLennan Agency
DeTeAssekuranz Vermittlungsgesellschaft mbH

DeTeAssekuranz Vermittlungsgesellschaft mbH

Innere Kanalstraße , Köln, NRW, 50672, DE

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
752/1000Fair

Internationale Stärke. Regionale Kompetenz im Konzern: Die Deutsche Telekom Assekuranz ist der interne Versicherungsmakler der Deutschen Telekom AG. Seit 1994 beraten wir Privatpersonen und Firmen, aus dem Telekom-Konzern und konzernfremd, in Deutschland und weltweit i...

NAICS:524
NAICS Definition:Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees:23
Subsidiaries:61
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Marsh McLennan Agency

Marsh McLennan Agency

360 Hamilton Ave, White Plains, US

Last Update: 03/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.marshmma.com/
758/1000Fair

Marsh McLennan Agency, a business of Marsh (NYSE: MRSH), is a leading provider of business insurance, employee health & benefits, retirement & wealth, and private client insurance solutions across the US and Canada. Marsh is a global leader in risk, reinsurance and capi...

NAICS:524
NAICS Definition:Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees:14,372
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
DeTeAssekuranz Vermittlungsgesellschaft mbH

DeTeAssekuranz Vermittlungsgesellschaft mbH

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Marsh McLennan Agency

Marsh McLennan Agency

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for DeTeAssekuranz Vermittlungsgesellschaft mbH in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Marsh McLennan Agency in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - DeTeAssekuranz Vermittlungsgesellschaft mbH (X = Date, Y = Severity)

DeTeAssekuranz Vermittlungsgesellschaft mbH cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Marsh McLennan Agency (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Marsh McLennan Agency cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
DeTeAssekuranz Vermittlungsgesellschaft mbH

DeTeAssekuranz Vermittlungsgesellschaft mbH

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Marsh McLennan Agency

Marsh McLennan Agency

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
MAR401072525

FAQ

Between DeTeAssekuranz Vermittlungsgesellschaft mbH company and Marsh McLennan Agency company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between DeTeAssekuranz Vermittlungsgesellschaft mbH company and Marsh McLennan Agency company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between DeTeAssekuranz Vermittlungsgesellschaft mbH company and Marsh McLennan Agency company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between DeTeAssekuranz Vermittlungsgesellschaft mbH company and Marsh McLennan Agency company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between DeTeAssekuranz Vermittlungsgesellschaft mbH company and Marsh McLennan Agency company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between DeTeAssekuranz Vermittlungsgesellschaft mbH company and Marsh McLennan Agency company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between DeTeAssekuranz Vermittlungsgesellschaft mbH company and Marsh McLennan Agency company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between DeTeAssekuranz Vermittlungsgesellschaft mbH company and Marsh McLennan Agency company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between DeTeAssekuranz Vermittlungsgesellschaft mbH company and Marsh McLennan Agency company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between DeTeAssekuranz Vermittlungsgesellschaft mbH company and Marsh McLennan Agency company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between DeTeAssekuranz Vermittlungsgesellschaft mbH company and Marsh McLennan Agency company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between DeTeAssekuranz Vermittlungsgesellschaft mbH and Marsh McLennan Agency, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between DeTeAssekuranz Vermittlungsgesellschaft mbH and Marsh McLennan Agency, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - DeTeAssekuranz Vermittlungsgesellschaft mbH or Marsh McLennan Agency ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - DeTeAssekuranz Vermittlungsgesellschaft mbH or Marsh McLennan Agency ?
Between DeTeAssekuranz Vermittlungsgesellschaft mbH and Marsh McLennan Agency, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between DeTeAssekuranz Vermittlungsgesellschaft mbH and Marsh McLennan Agency, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1