Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

DeTeAssekuranz Vermittlungsgesellschaft mbHDeTeAssekuranz Vermittlungsgesellschaft mbH
VS
Great EasternGreat Eastern
DeTeAssekuranz Vermittlungsgesellschaft mbH

DeTeAssekuranz Vermittlungsgesellschaft mbH

Innere Kanalstraße , Köln, NRW, 50672, DE

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
752/1000Fair

Internationale Stärke. Regionale Kompetenz im Konzern: Die Deutsche Telekom Assekuranz ist der interne Versicherungsmakler der Deutschen Telekom AG. Seit 1994 beraten wir Privatpersonen und Firmen, aus dem Telekom-Konzern und konzernfremd, in Deutschland und weltweit i...

NAICS:524
NAICS Definition:Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees:23
Subsidiaries:61
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Great Eastern

Great Eastern

1 Pickering Street , Singapore, 048659, SG

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
768/1000Fair

For 117 years, we have been helping customers across generations by protecting, preserving and growing what matters to them. As One Great Eastern Group today, we are enabling the goals of over 15.5 million customers by taking care of their needs across life, health, wea...

NAICS:524
NAICS Definition:Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees:14,366
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
DeTeAssekuranz Vermittlungsgesellschaft mbH

DeTeAssekuranz Vermittlungsgesellschaft mbH

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Great Eastern

Great Eastern

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for DeTeAssekuranz Vermittlungsgesellschaft mbH in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Great Eastern in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - DeTeAssekuranz Vermittlungsgesellschaft mbH (X = Date, Y = Severity)

DeTeAssekuranz Vermittlungsgesellschaft mbH cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Great Eastern (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Great Eastern cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
DeTeAssekuranz Vermittlungsgesellschaft mbH

DeTeAssekuranz Vermittlungsgesellschaft mbH

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Great Eastern

Great Eastern

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Data Leak
GRE95422223

FAQ

Between DeTeAssekuranz Vermittlungsgesellschaft mbH company and Great Eastern company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between DeTeAssekuranz Vermittlungsgesellschaft mbH company and Great Eastern company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between DeTeAssekuranz Vermittlungsgesellschaft mbH company and Great Eastern company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between DeTeAssekuranz Vermittlungsgesellschaft mbH company and Great Eastern company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between DeTeAssekuranz Vermittlungsgesellschaft mbH company and Great Eastern company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between DeTeAssekuranz Vermittlungsgesellschaft mbH company and Great Eastern company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between DeTeAssekuranz Vermittlungsgesellschaft mbH company and Great Eastern company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between DeTeAssekuranz Vermittlungsgesellschaft mbH company and Great Eastern company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between DeTeAssekuranz Vermittlungsgesellschaft mbH company and Great Eastern company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between DeTeAssekuranz Vermittlungsgesellschaft mbH company and Great Eastern company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between DeTeAssekuranz Vermittlungsgesellschaft mbH company and Great Eastern company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between DeTeAssekuranz Vermittlungsgesellschaft mbH and Great Eastern, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between DeTeAssekuranz Vermittlungsgesellschaft mbH and Great Eastern, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - DeTeAssekuranz Vermittlungsgesellschaft mbH or Great Eastern ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - DeTeAssekuranz Vermittlungsgesellschaft mbH or Great Eastern ?
Between DeTeAssekuranz Vermittlungsgesellschaft mbH and Great Eastern, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between DeTeAssekuranz Vermittlungsgesellschaft mbH and Great Eastern, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-67978
SUMMARY

An issue in the SBN UDP interface of NASA cFS v7.0.1 allows attackers to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via transmitting a crafted SBN frame.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-03
UPDATED
Date2026-08-03
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-67673
SUMMARY

A stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability exists in the cmd_edl function of OreSat Firmware v1.0. The vulnerability is triggered when processing the edl fw_flash command, where the <filename> argument is copied to a 64-byte stack buffer via memcpy without proper length validation. An attacker with physical access to the UART3 serial interface can exploit this vulnerability by sending a maliciously crafted command with an oversized filename parameter,

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-03
UPDATED
Date2026-08-03
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-48399
SUMMARY

Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) is affected by a Violation of Secure Design Principles vulnerability that could result in a Security feature bypass. An attacker could leverage this vulnerability to bypass security measures and gain unauthorized read access. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-03
UPDATED
Date2026-08-03
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-48333
SUMMARY

Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) is affected by an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability that could result in privilege escalation. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to gain elevated privileges. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-03
UPDATED
Date2026-08-03
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-48331
SUMMARY

Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) is affected by a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could result in privilege escalation. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. Scope is changed.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-03
UPDATED
Date2026-08-03
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9