Comparison Overview
DeTar Healthcare System
DeTar Healthcare System
506 E San Antonio St, Victoria, 77901, US
Last Update: 01/06/2026
Since 1924, the DeTar Healthcare System family has established footprints by developing comprehensive healthcare for the residents of the South Texas Crossroads. We've come a long way since father and son physicians, William and Webb T. DeTar opened a 10-bed hospital in...
Boston Children's Hospital
300 Longwood Ave, Boston, 02215, US
Last Update: 05/04/2026
Boston Children's Hospital is a 404-bed comprehensive center for pediatric health care. As one of the largest pediatric medical centers in the United States, Boston Children's offers a complete range of health care services for children from birth through 21 years of ag...
Compliance Ranges Comparison
DeTar Healthcare System
Boston Children's Hospital
Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for DeTar Healthcare System in 2026.
Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Boston Children's Hospital in 2026.
Incident History - DeTar Healthcare System (X = Date, Y = Severity)
DeTar Healthcare System cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Boston Children's Hospital (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Boston Children's Hospital cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents
DeTar Healthcare System
Boston Children's Hospital
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.
goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.
goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.
goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.
Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.