Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Det digitala MalmöDet digitala Malmö
VS
Ministero dell'InternoMinistero dell'Interno
Det digitala Malmö

Det digitala Malmö

August Palms plats, Malmö, 211 52, SE

Last Update: 29/01/2026

View Profile
761/1000Fair

"Det digitala Malmö"​ är Malmö stads program för digitalisering. Ger riktning för hur vi ska jobba med digital utveckling. Utgår från fyra olika fokusområden: - Det digitala mötet - Framtidens arbetsplats - Den smarta staden - Välfärdsutmaningar och sociala innovationer...

NAICS:92
NAICS Definition:Public Administration
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:5
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Ministero dell'Interno

Ministero dell'Interno

IT

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile

Il ministero dell'Interno è una struttura complessa il cui assetto organizzativo è disciplinato dal D.L.vo n. 300/99 e dai provvedimenti attuativi. A livello centrale, si articola in uffici di diretta collaborazione con il ministro (D.P.R. n. 98/2002) e cinque dipartime...

NAICS:92
NAICS Definition:Public Administration
Employees:13,519
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Det digitala Malmö

Det digitala Malmö

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Ministero dell'Interno

Ministero dell'Interno

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Det digitala Malmö in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Ministero dell'Interno in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Det digitala Malmö (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Det digitala Malmö cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Ministero dell'Interno (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Ministero dell'Interno cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Det digitala Malmö

Det digitala Malmö

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Ministero dell'Interno

Ministero dell'Interno

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Det digitala Malmö company and Ministero dell'Interno company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Det digitala Malmö company and Ministero dell'Interno company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Det digitala Malmö company and Ministero dell'Interno company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Det digitala Malmö company and Ministero dell'Interno company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Det digitala Malmö company and Ministero dell'Interno company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Det digitala Malmö company and Ministero dell'Interno company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Det digitala Malmö company and Ministero dell'Interno company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Det digitala Malmö company and Ministero dell'Interno company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Det digitala Malmö company and Ministero dell'Interno company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Det digitala Malmö company and Ministero dell'Interno company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Det digitala Malmö company and Ministero dell'Interno company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Det digitala Malmö and Ministero dell'Interno, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Det digitala Malmö and Ministero dell'Interno, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Det digitala Malmö or Ministero dell'Interno ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Det digitala Malmö or Ministero dell'Interno ?
Between Det digitala Malmö and Ministero dell'Interno, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Det digitala Malmö and Ministero dell'Interno, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-63261
SUMMARY

Uncontrolled Resource Consumption (CWE-400) in Kibana can lead to denial of service via Excessive Allocation (CAPEC-130). A low-privileged authenticated user can send a specially crafted request to a Kibana machine learning feature, causing the server to exhaust available memory and become unavailable to all users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63260
SUMMARY

Uncontrolled Resource Consumption (CWE-400) in Kibana can lead to denial of service via Excessive Allocation (CAPEC-130). An authenticated attacker with low-privilege access can trigger a denial of service condition in Kibana by sending a specially crafted, oversized request payload. Processing this user-supplied input requires resource-intensive memory allocation that can exhaust the available heap memory in the Kibana process, causing it to crash and become unavailable to all users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63259
SUMMARY

Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key (CWE-639) in Kibana can lead to information disclosure via user-supplied identifiers that reference scheduled query result data from Kibana Spaces the requester is not authorized to access.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63145
SUMMARY

Incorrect Authorization (CWE-863) in Kibana can lead to integrity compromise of Machine Learning audit and notification records via Accessing Functionality Not Properly Constrained by ACLs (CAPEC-1). A vulnerability exists in Kibana's Machine Learning functionality where a Machine Learning management endpoint performs an insufficient authorization check. The endpoint validates only a coarse privilege level but does not verify that the requesting user has access to the specific Machine Learning job or notification resources provided in the request. As a result, a low-privileged user with Machine Learning access in any Kibana space can manipulate Machine Learning audit and notification records for arbitrary jobs—including jobs in other spaces or belonging to other users—by leveraging Kibana's internally elevated credentials to write to restricted Machine Learning system indices that the user cannot access directly.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63144
SUMMARY

Uncontrolled Recursion (CWE-674) in Elasticsearch can lead to denial of service via a specially crafted search request submitted by a low-privileged authenticated user. A user with read-level index access can submit a request that triggers unbounded recursive processing within the Elasticsearch query evaluation component, causing a fatal error that terminates the affected node. In single-node deployments, this results in complete service outage; in multi-node clusters, it causes repeated node restarts and sustained availability degradation.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8