Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Det digitala MalmöDet digitala Malmö
VS
City of SeattleCity of Seattle
Det digitala Malmö

Det digitala Malmö

August Palms plats, Malmö, 211 52, SE

Last Update: 29/01/2026

View Profile
761/1000Fair

"Det digitala Malmö"​ är Malmö stads program för digitalisering. Ger riktning för hur vi ska jobba med digital utveckling. Utgår från fyra olika fokusområden: - Det digitala mötet - Framtidens arbetsplats - Den smarta staden - Välfärdsutmaningar och sociala innovationer...

NAICS:92
NAICS Definition:Public Administration
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:5
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
City of Seattle

City of Seattle

Seattle City Hall, Seattle, 98124, US

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.seattle.gov
779/1000Fair

Work With Purpose. Shape Seattle. Inspire the World. Seattle is more than a world-class city — it’s a vibrant, evolving community rooted in shared values of sustainability, innovation, and inclusion. As a public employer, the City of Seattle is committed to building a ...

NAICS:92
NAICS Definition:Public Administration
Employees:10,724
Subsidiaries:26
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Det digitala Malmö

Det digitala Malmö

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
City of Seattle

City of Seattle

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Det digitala Malmö in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for City of Seattle in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Det digitala Malmö (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Det digitala Malmö cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - City of Seattle (X = Date, Y = Severity)

City of Seattle cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Det digitala Malmö

Det digitala Malmö

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
City of Seattle

City of Seattle

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Det digitala Malmö company and City of Seattle company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Det digitala Malmö company and City of Seattle company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Det digitala Malmö company and City of Seattle company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Det digitala Malmö company and City of Seattle company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Det digitala Malmö company and City of Seattle company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Det digitala Malmö company and City of Seattle company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Det digitala Malmö company and City of Seattle company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Det digitala Malmö company and City of Seattle company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Det digitala Malmö company and City of Seattle company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Det digitala Malmö company and City of Seattle company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Det digitala Malmö company and City of Seattle company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Det digitala Malmö and City of Seattle, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Det digitala Malmö and City of Seattle, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Det digitala Malmö or City of Seattle ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Det digitala Malmö or City of Seattle ?
Between Det digitala Malmö and City of Seattle, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Det digitala Malmö and City of Seattle, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1