Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Design Collective by CintasDesign Collective by Cintas
VS
Aditya Birla Fashion and Retail Ltd.Aditya Birla Fashion and Retail Ltd.
Design Collective by Cintas

Design Collective by Cintas

undefined, Chicago, IL, 60638, US

Last Update: 09/02/2026

View Profile
764/1000Fair

What we wear is personal. It provides comfort. Confidence. Expression. When it comes to work, the right apparel can make a world of difference. Which is why when designing that apparel, it's all about a perfect fit: A flexible, collaborative partner. A vision that captu...

NAICS:448
NAICS Definition:Clothing and Clothing Accessories Stores
Employees:257
Subsidiaries:2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Aditya Birla Fashion and Retail Ltd.

Aditya Birla Fashion and Retail Ltd.

Piramal Agastya Corporate Park, Building 'A', 4th and 5th Floor, Unit No. 401, 403, 501, 502, L.B.S. Road, Kurla, Mumbai, Maharashtra, IN, 400070

Last Update: 31/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.abfrl.com/
763/1000Fair

Aditya Birla Fashion and Retail Limited (ABFRL), part of the Aditya Birla Group, is India’s leading fashion powerhouse, offering a distinguished portfolio of renowned brands and retail formats, catering to multiple high-growth segments. As of March 31, 2025, the Compan...

NAICS:448
NAICS Definition:Clothing and Clothing Accessories Stores
Employees:14,033
Subsidiaries:18
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Design Collective by Cintas

Design Collective by Cintas

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Aditya Birla Fashion and Retail Ltd.

Aditya Birla Fashion and Retail Ltd.

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Retail Apparel and Fashion Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Design Collective by Cintas in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Retail Apparel and Fashion Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Aditya Birla Fashion and Retail Ltd. in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Design Collective by Cintas (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Design Collective by Cintas cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Aditya Birla Fashion and Retail Ltd. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Aditya Birla Fashion and Retail Ltd. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Design Collective by Cintas

Design Collective by Cintas

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Aditya Birla Fashion and Retail Ltd.

Aditya Birla Fashion and Retail Ltd.

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Design Collective by Cintas company and Aditya Birla Fashion and Retail Ltd. company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Design Collective by Cintas company and Aditya Birla Fashion and Retail Ltd. company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Design Collective by Cintas company and Aditya Birla Fashion and Retail Ltd. company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Design Collective by Cintas company and Aditya Birla Fashion and Retail Ltd. company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Design Collective by Cintas company and Aditya Birla Fashion and Retail Ltd. company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Design Collective by Cintas company and Aditya Birla Fashion and Retail Ltd. company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Design Collective by Cintas company and Aditya Birla Fashion and Retail Ltd. company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Design Collective by Cintas company and Aditya Birla Fashion and Retail Ltd. company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Design Collective by Cintas company and Aditya Birla Fashion and Retail Ltd. company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Design Collective by Cintas company and Aditya Birla Fashion and Retail Ltd. company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Design Collective by Cintas company and Aditya Birla Fashion and Retail Ltd. company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Design Collective by Cintas and Aditya Birla Fashion and Retail Ltd., which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Design Collective by Cintas and Aditya Birla Fashion and Retail Ltd., which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Design Collective by Cintas or Aditya Birla Fashion and Retail Ltd. ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Design Collective by Cintas or Aditya Birla Fashion and Retail Ltd. ?
Between Design Collective by Cintas and Aditya Birla Fashion and Retail Ltd., which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Design Collective by Cintas and Aditya Birla Fashion and Retail Ltd., which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1