Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Design EcologyDesign Ecology
VS
CHINA STATE CONSTRUCTION (CSCEC)CHINA STATE CONSTRUCTION (CSCEC)
Design Ecology

Design Ecology

San Francisco, US

Last Update: 28/11/2025

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.designecology.com
749/1000Moderate

Technical Consultants and Design Facilitation with specific expertise in integrated water management, regenerative design services, and the application of performance based landscape systems in built environments. Driving innovation in the use of green roofs and living...

NAICS:54131
NAICS Definition:Architectural Services
Employees:10
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
CHINA STATE CONSTRUCTION (CSCEC)

CHINA STATE CONSTRUCTION (CSCEC)

Building 3, Courtyard 5, Anding Road, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100029, CN

Last Update: 04/10/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.cscec.com.cn/
798/1000Fair

China State Construction Engineering Corporation Ltd (in short: China Construction; Stock code: 601668), formally established on December 10, 2007, was co-initiated by four Fortune Global 500 enterprises: China State Construction Engineering Corp. (CSCEC), China Nationa...

NAICS:54131
NAICS Definition:Architectural Services
Employees:37,998
Subsidiaries:33
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Design Ecology

Design Ecology

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
CHINA STATE CONSTRUCTION (CSCEC)

CHINA STATE CONSTRUCTION (CSCEC)

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Architecture and Planning Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Design Ecology in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Architecture and Planning Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for CHINA STATE CONSTRUCTION (CSCEC) in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Design Ecology (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Design Ecology cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - CHINA STATE CONSTRUCTION (CSCEC) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

CHINA STATE CONSTRUCTION (CSCEC) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Design Ecology

Design Ecology

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
CHINA STATE CONSTRUCTION (CSCEC)

CHINA STATE CONSTRUCTION (CSCEC)

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Design Ecology company and CHINA STATE CONSTRUCTION (CSCEC) company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Design Ecology company and CHINA STATE CONSTRUCTION (CSCEC) company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Design Ecology company and CHINA STATE CONSTRUCTION (CSCEC) company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Design Ecology company and CHINA STATE CONSTRUCTION (CSCEC) company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Design Ecology company and CHINA STATE CONSTRUCTION (CSCEC) company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Design Ecology company and CHINA STATE CONSTRUCTION (CSCEC) company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Design Ecology company and CHINA STATE CONSTRUCTION (CSCEC) company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Design Ecology company and CHINA STATE CONSTRUCTION (CSCEC) company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Design Ecology company and CHINA STATE CONSTRUCTION (CSCEC) company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Design Ecology company and CHINA STATE CONSTRUCTION (CSCEC) company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Design Ecology company and CHINA STATE CONSTRUCTION (CSCEC) company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Design Ecology and CHINA STATE CONSTRUCTION (CSCEC), which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Design Ecology and CHINA STATE CONSTRUCTION (CSCEC), which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Design Ecology or CHINA STATE CONSTRUCTION (CSCEC) ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Design Ecology or CHINA STATE CONSTRUCTION (CSCEC) ?
Between Design Ecology and CHINA STATE CONSTRUCTION (CSCEC), which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Design Ecology and CHINA STATE CONSTRUCTION (CSCEC), which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-113705
SUMMARY

A vulnerability was determined in a2aproject a2a-rs up to 0.4.3. This issue affects some unknown processing of the file a2a-server/src/error.rs. Executing a manipulation can lead to information exposure through error message. The attack can be executed remotely. This patch is called 713b943af94ab2d521d483b841618b97a2e78a4d. A patch should be applied to remediate this issue.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-20
UPDATED
Date2026-10-20
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 5.0
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-9825
SUMMARY

IBM Cyber Fraud 1.0.0 through 1.0.2 has a missing secure attribute allowing sensitive cookies to be transmitted over unencrypted connections, potentially enabling an attacker to intercept session data through network-based attacks.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-20
UPDATED
Date2026-10-20
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.7
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-94402
SUMMARY

IBM Carbon Charts 0.4.0 through 1.27.19 is vulnerable to cross-site scripting. The MeterChart component's Title.truncateTitle() function re-inserts a substring of user-supplied label text into the DOM via an unsanitized innerHTML write when the title exceeds the available container width. A remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability to execute arbitrary JavaScript in the victim's browser session.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-20
UPDATED
Date2026-10-20
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-93888
SUMMARY

IBM Sterling Connect Direct for Unix 6.4.0.0 through 6.4.0.6 and 6.3.0.0 through 6.3.0.7 apnotify utility is vulnerable to a code injection due to insufficient validation of user input.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-20
UPDATED
Date2026-10-20
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-93744
SUMMARY

IBM i 7.3, 7.4, 7.5, and 7.6 could allow an unathenticated remote attacker to bypass security restrictions due to improper access control. By sending a specially crafted HTTP request to any URL within the Navigator application prior to authentication, a bad actor could exploit this vulnerability to alter server-side session security state.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-20
UPDATED
Date2026-10-20
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9