Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

DESFADESFA
VS
EcopetrolEcopetrol
DESFA

DESFA

357-359 Messogion Avenue, Chalandri, Attiki, GR, 15231

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.desfa.gr
709/1000Moderate

DESFA, as the Operator of the Greek National Natural Gas System, operates and develops with safety and innovation a wide network of modern infrastructure throughout the country, while paving the way for a greener future. With significant experience and highly qualified...

NAICS:211
NAICS Definition:Oil and Gas Extraction
Employees:511
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
Ecopetrol

Ecopetrol

Cra. 13 No. 36-24, Bogotá, CO, ----

Last Update: 21/10/2026

View Profile
Between 650 and 699
http://www.ecopetrol.com.co
659/1000Weak

Ecopetrol (NYSE: EC) es la compañía más grande en Colombia y uno de los principales grupos de energía de Latinoamérica. Cuenta con más de 18.000 empleados y es responsable del 60% de la producción de hidrocarburos en Colombia. Es propietaria de las dos refinerías del Co...

NAICS:211
NAICS Definition:Oil and Gas Extraction
Employees:13,096
Subsidiaries:2
12-month incidents
2
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
2

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
DESFA

DESFA

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Ecopetrol

Ecopetrol

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Oil and Gas Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for DESFA in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Oil and Gas Industry Avg (This Year)

Ecopetrol has 98.02% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - DESFA (X = Date, Y = Severity)

DESFA cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Ecopetrol (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Ecopetrol cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
DESFA

DESFA

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
DES204526822
Ecopetrol

Ecopetrol

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
ECO1784557630
🔒 Incident : Breach
ECO1784348677

FAQ

Between DESFA company and Ecopetrol company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between DESFA company and Ecopetrol company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between DESFA company and Ecopetrol company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between DESFA company and Ecopetrol company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between DESFA company and Ecopetrol company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between DESFA company and Ecopetrol company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between DESFA company and Ecopetrol company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between DESFA company and Ecopetrol company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between DESFA company and Ecopetrol company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between DESFA company and Ecopetrol company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between DESFA company and Ecopetrol company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between DESFA and Ecopetrol, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between DESFA and Ecopetrol, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - DESFA or Ecopetrol ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - DESFA or Ecopetrol ?
Between DESFA and Ecopetrol, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between DESFA and Ecopetrol, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-113705
SUMMARY

A vulnerability was determined in a2aproject a2a-rs up to 0.4.3. This issue affects some unknown processing of the file a2a-server/src/error.rs. Executing a manipulation can lead to information exposure through error message. The attack can be executed remotely. This patch is called 713b943af94ab2d521d483b841618b97a2e78a4d. A patch should be applied to remediate this issue.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-20
UPDATED
Date2026-10-20
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 5.0
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-9825
SUMMARY

IBM Cyber Fraud 1.0.0 through 1.0.2 has a missing secure attribute allowing sensitive cookies to be transmitted over unencrypted connections, potentially enabling an attacker to intercept session data through network-based attacks.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-20
UPDATED
Date2026-10-20
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.7
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-94402
SUMMARY

IBM Carbon Charts 0.4.0 through 1.27.19 is vulnerable to cross-site scripting. The MeterChart component's Title.truncateTitle() function re-inserts a substring of user-supplied label text into the DOM via an unsanitized innerHTML write when the title exceeds the available container width. A remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability to execute arbitrary JavaScript in the victim's browser session.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-20
UPDATED
Date2026-10-20
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-93888
SUMMARY

IBM Sterling Connect Direct for Unix 6.4.0.0 through 6.4.0.6 and 6.3.0.0 through 6.3.0.7 apnotify utility is vulnerable to a code injection due to insufficient validation of user input.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-20
UPDATED
Date2026-10-20
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-93744
SUMMARY

IBM i 7.3, 7.4, 7.5, and 7.6 could allow an unathenticated remote attacker to bypass security restrictions due to improper access control. By sending a specially crafted HTTP request to any URL within the Navigator application prior to authentication, a bad actor could exploit this vulnerability to alter server-side session security state.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-20
UPDATED
Date2026-10-20
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9