Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

FieldEdge by XplorFieldEdge by Xplor
VS
MicrosoftMicrosoft
FieldEdge by Xplor

FieldEdge by Xplor

950 East Paces Ferry Rd NE , Atlanta, Georgia, 30326, US

Last Update: 20/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://fieldedge.com/
753/1000Fair

Turbocharge your techs, organize your office, save time, and make more money. FieldEdge is the leading provider of innovative service management software for the home services industry. With offices in Fort Myers and Atlanta, FieldEdge serves more than 30 service verti...

NAICS:5112
NAICS Definition:Software Publishers
Employees:176
Subsidiaries:23
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Microsoft

Microsoft

1 Microsoft Way, Redmond, Washington, US, 98052

Last Update: 19/06/2026

View Profile
Between 650 and 699
https://news.microsoft.com/
658/1000Weak

Every company has a mission. What's ours? To empower every person and every organization to achieve more. We believe technology can and should be a force for good and that meaningful innovation contributes to a brighter world in the future and today. Our culture doesn’t...

NAICS:5112
NAICS Definition:Software Publishers
Employees:226,477
Subsidiaries:52
12-month incidents
12
Known data breaches
7
Attack type number
5

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
FieldEdge by Xplor

FieldEdge by Xplor

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Microsoft

Microsoft

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for FieldEdge by Xplor in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)

Microsoft has 1021.5% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - FieldEdge by Xplor (X = Date, Y = Severity)

FieldEdge by Xplor cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Microsoft (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Microsoft cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
FieldEdge by Xplor

FieldEdge by Xplor

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Microsoft

Microsoft

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
MIC1780900177
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
MIC1781541072
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
MIC1778229035

FAQ

Between FieldEdge by Xplor company and Microsoft company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between FieldEdge by Xplor company and Microsoft company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between FieldEdge by Xplor company and Microsoft company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between FieldEdge by Xplor company and Microsoft company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between FieldEdge by Xplor company and Microsoft company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between FieldEdge by Xplor company and Microsoft company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between FieldEdge by Xplor company and Microsoft company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between FieldEdge by Xplor company and Microsoft company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between FieldEdge by Xplor company and Microsoft company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between FieldEdge by Xplor company and Microsoft company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between FieldEdge by Xplor company and Microsoft company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between FieldEdge by Xplor and Microsoft, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between FieldEdge by Xplor and Microsoft, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - FieldEdge by Xplor or Microsoft ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - FieldEdge by Xplor or Microsoft ?
Between FieldEdge by Xplor and Microsoft, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between FieldEdge by Xplor and Microsoft, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-56355
SUMMARY

GNU Savannah Administration Savane through 3.17 uses untrusted data as part of authorization.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-20
UPDATED
Date2026-06-20
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.7
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-56347
SUMMARY

AVideo TopMenu plugin through version 26.0 contains a stored cross-site scripting vulnerability in menu item rendering due to missing output encoding of icon classes, URLs, and text labels. Attackers can inject malicious JavaScript through unescaped menu item fields that execute for all site visitors, potentially stealing session cookies or performing unauthorized actions.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-20
UPDATED
Date2026-06-20
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
2.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-56346
SUMMARY

AVideo through version 25.0 contains an authentication bypass vulnerability in the decryptMessage.json.php endpoint that allows unauthenticated users to decrypt PGP messages. Remote attackers can submit private keys, ciphertext, and passphrases to perform server-side decryption without credentials, exposing key material to logs and enabling resource exhaustion attacks.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-20
UPDATED
Date2026-06-20
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-56345
SUMMARY

AVideo through 29.0 contains an authorization bypass vulnerability in the Meet plugin's uploadRecordedVideo.json.php endpoint that derives the target users_id from the uploaded filename without verification. An attacker with knowledge of the Meet shared secret can craft a malicious file upload with a filename containing an arbitrary users_id to invoke passwordless User->login() and establish an authenticated session as any user including admin. Attackers can obtain the Meet shared secret through path-traversal vulnerabilities or timing attacks against checkToken.json.php, then POST a crafted file to uploadRecordedVideo.json.php with a filename like '1-anything.mp4' to hijack admin sessions and gain full account takeover.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-20
UPDATED
Date2026-06-20
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 9.2
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-56342
SUMMARY

AVideo through version 27.0 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability in plugin/Live/test.php that allows authenticated administrators to read arbitrary URLs via the statsURL parameter, which lacks isSSRFSafeURL() validation and accepts requests to private IP ranges and cloud metadata endpoints. Attackers can exploit this by crafting requests to internal services, cloud metadata endpoints like 169.254.169.254, and localhost to retrieve sensitive information including IAM credentials, internal service responses, and network configuration details.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-20
UPDATED
Date2026-06-20
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.3