Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Department for Transport (DfT), United KingdomDepartment for Transport (DfT), United Kingdom
VS
CorreiosCorreios
Department for Transport (DfT), United Kingdom

Department for Transport (DfT), United Kingdom

Great Minster House, 33 Horsferry Road, London, GB, SW1P 4DR

Last Update: 30/12/2025

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.gov.uk/dft
775/1000Fair

We work with our agencies and partners to support the transport network that helps UK businesses and gets people and goods travelling around the country. We plan and invest in transport infrastructure to keep the UK on the move. We're responsible for: • providing pol...

NAICS:92
NAICS Definition:Public Administration
Employees:3,492
Subsidiaries:69
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Correios

Correios

SBN Quadra 1 Bloco A Edifício Correios, Brasília, 70002-900, BR

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.correios.com.br
788/1000Fair

Empresa Brasileira de Correios e Telégrafos foi criada como empresa em 1969 por decreto lei. Hoje conta com mais de 100.000 empregados, tem presença em todos os municípios do Brasil. NEGÓCIO: Soluções que aproximam. MISSÃO: Fornecer soluções acessíveis e confiáveis ...

NAICS:92
NAICS Definition:Public Administration
Employees:34,932
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Department for Transport (DfT), United Kingdom

Department for Transport (DfT), United Kingdom

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Correios

Correios

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Department for Transport (DfT), United Kingdom in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Correios in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Department for Transport (DfT), United Kingdom (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Department for Transport (DfT), United Kingdom cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Correios (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Correios cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Department for Transport (DfT), United Kingdom

Department for Transport (DfT), United Kingdom

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Correios

Correios

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Department for Transport (DfT), United Kingdom company and Correios company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Department for Transport (DfT), United Kingdom company and Correios company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Department for Transport (DfT), United Kingdom company and Correios company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Department for Transport (DfT), United Kingdom company and Correios company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Department for Transport (DfT), United Kingdom company and Correios company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Department for Transport (DfT), United Kingdom company and Correios company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Department for Transport (DfT), United Kingdom company and Correios company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Department for Transport (DfT), United Kingdom company and Correios company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Department for Transport (DfT), United Kingdom company and Correios company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Department for Transport (DfT), United Kingdom company and Correios company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Department for Transport (DfT), United Kingdom company and Correios company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Department for Transport (DfT), United Kingdom and Correios, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Department for Transport (DfT), United Kingdom and Correios, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Department for Transport (DfT), United Kingdom or Correios ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Department for Transport (DfT), United Kingdom or Correios ?
Between Department for Transport (DfT), United Kingdom and Correios, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Department for Transport (DfT), United Kingdom and Correios, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-57995
SUMMARY

phpMyFAQ before 4.1.5 contains a privilege escalation vulnerability in GroupController::updatePermissions that allows GROUP_EDIT administrators to grant arbitrary rights to groups without verifying they hold those rights themselves. A delegated administrator can exploit this by assigning high-value permissions to a group they belong to, inheriting those rights and escalating privileges up to full administrative control.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-30
UPDATED
Date2026-06-30
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-56777
SUMMARY

n8n before 2.25.7 and 2.26.x before 2.26.2 contains an abstract syntax tree (AST) security validator bypass in the Python Code node. An authenticated user with permission to create or modify workflows containing a Python Code node can bypass the validator and access the task executor module namespace. The issue only affects self-hosted instances where the Python Task Runner is enabled; where N8N_BLOCK_RUNNER_ENV_ACCESS is configured to allow it, this can disclose environment variables accessible to the task runner process.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-30
UPDATED
Date2026-06-30
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.1
CVE-2026-56700
SUMMARY

Grav CMS before 2.0.0-beta.2 contains multiple code-execution vulnerabilities. Three unsafe unserialize() calls - in Scheduler\JobQueue, Framework\Cache\Adapter\FileCache, and Session - deserialize untrusted data without restricting allowed classes, enabling PHP object injection and, via a gadget chain, arbitrary code execution where an attacker controls the serialized input. Additionally, InstallCommand's git clone operation passes the branch, url, and path parameters into a shell command without escaping, allowing OS command injection via plugin/theme installation (which requires admin access). A Twig security blocklist bypass (server-side template injection) is also present. The issues are fixed in 2.0.0-beta.2.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-30
UPDATED
Date2026-06-30
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 9.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-56415
SUMMARY

Storage Concentrator (SC & SCVM) contains a command injection vulnerability within the debug.pl script that is reachable without authentication. A remote attacker can submit a specially crafted HTTP request containing a malicious payload that is processed without adequate input sanitization, resulting in arbitrary command execution with root-level privileges on the underlying system.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-30
UPDATED
Date2026-06-30
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:L/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-56413
SUMMARY

Storage Concentrator (SC & SCVM) contains a command injection vulnerability in the ms_service.pl service, which listens on TCP port 9000 by default and accepts custom network packets to perform device actions. An unauthenticated remote attacker can send a specially crafted packet containing a malicious payload that is processed without adequate sanitization, resulting in arbitrary command execution with root-level privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-30
UPDATED
Date2026-06-30
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:L/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9