Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Department for International Development (DFID)Department for International Development (DFID)
VS
RijkswaterstaatRijkswaterstaat
Department for International Development (DFID)

Department for International Development (DFID)

22 Whitehall, London, SW1A 2EG, GB

Last Update: 29/03/2026

View Profile

The Cabinet Office is at the centre of Government, coordinating policy and strategy. The Cabinet Office supports the Prime Minister and ensures the smooth running of government - from developing policy, to modernising public services. We welcome talented people from all...

NAICS:92
NAICS Definition:Public Administration
Employees:1,341
Subsidiaries:69
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Rijkswaterstaat

Rijkswaterstaat

Koningskade 4, Den Haag, 2500 EX, NL

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
783/1000Fair

Rijkswaterstaat is de uitvoeringsorganisatie van het Ministerie van Infrastructuur en Waterstaat. We beheren en ontwikkelen de rijkswegen, -vaarwegen en –wateren en zetten in op een duurzame leefomgeving. Samen met andere organisaties werken we aan een land dat bescher...

NAICS:92
NAICS Definition:Public Administration
Employees:12,096
Subsidiaries:2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Department for International Development (DFID)

Department for International Development (DFID)

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Rijkswaterstaat

Rijkswaterstaat

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Department for International Development (DFID) in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Rijkswaterstaat in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Department for International Development (DFID) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Department for International Development (DFID) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Rijkswaterstaat (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Rijkswaterstaat cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Department for International Development (DFID)

Department for International Development (DFID)

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Rijkswaterstaat

Rijkswaterstaat

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Department for International Development (DFID) company and Rijkswaterstaat company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Department for International Development (DFID) company and Rijkswaterstaat company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Department for International Development (DFID) company and Rijkswaterstaat company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Department for International Development (DFID) company and Rijkswaterstaat company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Department for International Development (DFID) company and Rijkswaterstaat company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Department for International Development (DFID) company and Rijkswaterstaat company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Department for International Development (DFID) company and Rijkswaterstaat company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Department for International Development (DFID) company and Rijkswaterstaat company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Department for International Development (DFID) company and Rijkswaterstaat company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Department for International Development (DFID) company and Rijkswaterstaat company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Department for International Development (DFID) company and Rijkswaterstaat company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Department for International Development (DFID) and Rijkswaterstaat, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Department for International Development (DFID) and Rijkswaterstaat, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Department for International Development (DFID) or Rijkswaterstaat ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Department for International Development (DFID) or Rijkswaterstaat ?
Between Department for International Development (DFID) and Rijkswaterstaat, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Department for International Development (DFID) and Rijkswaterstaat, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-5270
SUMMARY

An authentication bypass vulnerability exists in certain releases of Ciena Navigator Network Control Suite (NCS), Manage Control Plan (MCP), and Blue Planet products. The issue is caused by improper handling of HTTP request paths and headers, which allows an unauthenticated attacker to manipulate requests in a manner that bypasses authentication and associated audit logging controls.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-14
UPDATED
Date2026-07-14
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-5269
SUMMARY

In Ciena's Navigator Network Control Suite (NCS) and Manage Control Plan (MCP), there are hidden system accounts used for internal software operations. Some of these accounts have default passwords that may be predictable. While these accounts have very limited permissions on their own, an attacker could combine an attack using one of these accounts with other potential weaknesses to launch a more significant attack, possibly leading to escalation of privilege on the system.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-14
UPDATED
Date2026-07-14
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-51808
SUMMARY

Buffer Overflow vulnerability in OpenHTJ2K v.0.18.4 and before allows an attacker to execute arbitrary code via the openhtj2k_decoder_impl::invoke, invoke_line_based, invoke_line_based_stream, and invoke_line_based_predecoded function in source/core/interface/decoder.cpp

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-14
UPDATED
Date2026-07-14
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-51807
SUMMARY

Buffer Overflow vulnerability in OpenHTJ2K v.0.18.4 and before allows an attacker to execute arbitrary code via the j2k_precinct_subband::parse_packet_header() in source/core/coding/coding_units.cpp

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-14
UPDATED
Date2026-07-14
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-36035
SUMMARY

Incorrect access control in the /api/License/deactivateOffline endpoint of CAXPerts UniversalPlantViewer WebServices Server v2.7.6 allows authenticated attackers with low-level privileges to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via removing the license from the webserver.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-14
UPDATED
Date2026-07-14
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA